Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1343048 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas.Betker@rohde-schwarz.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-25 11:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-25 19:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: JFFS2 deadlock Thomas.Betker@rohde-schwarz.com - 2016-02-25 11:00 +0100
Re: JFFS2 deadlock David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> - 2016-02-25 12:30 +0100
Re: JFFS2 deadlock Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 19:00 +0100
| From | Thomas.Betker@rohde-schwarz.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 11:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: JFFS2 deadlock |
| Message-ID | <r60Se-1Sg-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello Joakim: > Can we get this upstream before next release? I don't think there > will much more > testing at this point. I would second this. Actually, I did some additional stress testing, but didn't see any problems. Best regards, Thomas
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 12:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r62hk-32V-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1343048 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 10:57 +0100, Thomas.Betker@rohde-schwarz.com wrote: > Hello Joakim: > > > Can we get this upstream before next release? I don't think there > > will much more > > testing at this point. > > I would second this. Actually, I did some additional stress testing, but > didn't see any problems. OK, of the four fixes I had in my branch, three are Cc:stable and I have pushed them to linux-mtd.git. I'll give them a day or two in linux-next and then send a pull request. The fourth, which is just a mount speedup, I've put in l2-mtd.git. Brian, was that the right way to do it? I feel like an impostor pushing to my own repositories now :) -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 19:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r68mK-7ld-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1343121 |
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:22:12AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > OK, of the four fixes I had in my branch, three are Cc:stable and I > have pushed them to linux-mtd.git. I'll give them a day or two in > linux-next and then send a pull request. > > The fourth, which is just a mount speedup, I've put in l2-mtd.git. > > Brian, was that the right way to do it? I feel like an impostor pushing > to my own repositories now :) Nope, that's perfect. Happy to have a JFFS2 maintainer again :) (Feel free to send the MAINTAINERS update that's also in linux-mtd.git/master. It was meant to ride along with whatever else needed pushed to Linus.) Brian
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web