Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1343048 > unrolled thread

Re: JFFS2 deadlock

Started byThomas.Betker@rohde-schwarz.com
First post2016-02-25 11:00 +0100
Last post2016-02-25 19:00 +0100
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: JFFS2 deadlock Thomas.Betker@rohde-schwarz.com - 2016-02-25 11:00 +0100
    Re: JFFS2 deadlock David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> - 2016-02-25 12:30 +0100
      Re: JFFS2 deadlock Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 19:00 +0100

#1343048 — Re: JFFS2 deadlock

FromThomas.Betker@rohde-schwarz.com
Date2016-02-25 11:00 +0100
SubjectRe: JFFS2 deadlock
Message-ID<r60Se-1Sg-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hello Joakim:

> Can we get this upstream before next release? I don't think there 
> will much more
> testing at this point.

I would second this. Actually, I did some additional stress testing, but 
didn't see any problems.

Best regards,
Thomas

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1343121

FromDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date2016-02-25 12:30 +0100
Message-ID<r62hk-32V-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1343048

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, 2016-02-25 at 10:57 +0100, Thomas.Betker@rohde-schwarz.com wrote:
> Hello Joakim:
> 
> > Can we get this upstream before next release? I don't think there 
> > will much more
> > testing at this point.
> 
> I would second this. Actually, I did some additional stress testing, but 
> didn't see any problems.

OK, of the four fixes I had in my branch, three are Cc:stable and I
have pushed them to linux-mtd.git. I'll give them a day or two in
linux-next and then send a pull request.

The fourth, which is just a mount speedup, I've put in l2-mtd.git.

Brian, was that the right way to do it? I feel like an impostor pushing
to my own repositories now :)

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@intel.com                              Intel Corporation

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1343369

FromBrian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-25 19:00 +0100
Message-ID<r68mK-7ld-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1343121
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 11:22:12AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> OK, of the four fixes I had in my branch, three are Cc:stable and I
> have pushed them to linux-mtd.git. I'll give them a day or two in
> linux-next and then send a pull request.
> 
> The fourth, which is just a mount speedup, I've put in l2-mtd.git.
> 
> Brian, was that the right way to do it? I feel like an impostor pushing
> to my own repositories now :)

Nope, that's perfect. Happy to have a JFFS2 maintainer again :)

(Feel free to send the MAINTAINERS update that's also in
linux-mtd.git/master. It was meant to ride along with whatever else
needed pushed to Linus.)

Brian

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web