Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1342505 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-25 00:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-25 06:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [GIT PULL 3/7] drivers: soc: EXYNOS drivers for v4.6 Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-02-25 00:00 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL 3/7] drivers: soc: EXYNOS drivers for v4.6 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-02-25 01:50 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL 3/7] drivers: soc: EXYNOS drivers for v4.6 Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> - 2016-02-25 02:40 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL 3/7] drivers: soc: EXYNOS drivers for v4.6 "pankaj.dubey" <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> - 2016-02-25 05:20 +0100
Re: [GIT PULL 3/7] drivers: soc: EXYNOS drivers for v4.6 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2016-02-25 06:00 +0100
| From | Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 00:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [GIT PULL 3/7] drivers: soc: EXYNOS drivers for v4.6 |
| Message-ID | <r5Qzw-2Tx-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 09:34:02AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Hi Arnd, Kevin and Olof, > > This finally moves SROM controller and PMU code to separate > driver under drivers/soc/samsung. > > Kind regards, > Krzysztof > > > The following changes since commit 92e963f50fc74041b5e9e744c330dca48e04f08d: > > Linux 4.5-rc1 (2016-01-24 13:06:47 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-drivers-soc-srom-pmu-4.6 > > for you to fetch changes up to 74a6659e8bf193066ba6bf365de66baa897aebb1: > > drivers: soc: Add support for Exynos PMU driver (2016-01-25 10:46:59 +0900) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > A set of changes adding new drivers under drivers/soc/samsung: > > 1. Split code for handling SROM registers out of arm/mach-exynos > in to separate SROM controller driver under drivers/soc/samsung. > The driver will save and restore SROM registers during Suspend > to RAM. > > 2. Add to this SROM controller driver support for bank configuration > used by child devices. This allows usage of SMSC9115 Ethernet chip > on SMDK5410 (Exynos5410) directly connected to SROM controller. Hi, OMAP has GPMC drivers under drivers/memory. I wonder if SROM should go there too, since it's a quite similar bus. Feel free to respin this without SROM now, so we can get the other pieces in sooner and then revisit the SROM asyncronously. That'll remove the dependencies on DT as well. -Olof
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 01:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r5ShX-4du-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1342505 |
On 25.02.2016 07:22, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 09:34:02AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> Hi Arnd, Kevin and Olof, >> >> This finally moves SROM controller and PMU code to separate >> driver under drivers/soc/samsung. >> >> Kind regards, >> Krzysztof >> >> >> The following changes since commit 92e963f50fc74041b5e9e744c330dca48e04f08d: >> >> Linux 4.5-rc1 (2016-01-24 13:06:47 -0800) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-drivers-soc-srom-pmu-4.6 >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 74a6659e8bf193066ba6bf365de66baa897aebb1: >> >> drivers: soc: Add support for Exynos PMU driver (2016-01-25 10:46:59 +0900) >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> A set of changes adding new drivers under drivers/soc/samsung: >> >> 1. Split code for handling SROM registers out of arm/mach-exynos >> in to separate SROM controller driver under drivers/soc/samsung. >> The driver will save and restore SROM registers during Suspend >> to RAM. >> >> 2. Add to this SROM controller driver support for bank configuration >> used by child devices. This allows usage of SMSC9115 Ethernet chip >> on SMDK5410 (Exynos5410) directly connected to SROM controller. > > Hi, > > OMAP has GPMC drivers under drivers/memory. I wonder if SROM should go there > too, since it's a quite similar bus. I wish I get this feedback before, when we were discussing the SROM patches. :/ Indeed this sounds reasonable. On some boards the omap-gpmc is used for the same purpose: interfacing to smsc,lan9115 (like on SMDK5410). > Feel free to respin this without SROM now, so we can get the other pieces in > sooner and then revisit the SROM asyncronously. That'll remove the dependencies > on DT as well. Okay, I'll rebase all drivers/soc branches and respin the pull request so PMU driver and other stuff could go in. BTW, just in case, although PMU stands for "Power Management Unit" I don't think it should be placed under drivers/power because it is not a avs/charger/battery/reset driver. Existing power-related drivers are under driver/soc (bcm, dove, tegra). Re-work of SROM drivers could be started on top of it. Best regards, Krzysztof
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 02:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r5T4m-4NQ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1342554 |
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> wrote: > On 25.02.2016 07:22, Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 09:34:02AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> Hi Arnd, Kevin and Olof, >>> >>> This finally moves SROM controller and PMU code to separate >>> driver under drivers/soc/samsung. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Krzysztof >>> >>> >>> The following changes since commit 92e963f50fc74041b5e9e744c330dca48e04f08d: >>> >>> Linux 4.5-rc1 (2016-01-24 13:06:47 -0800) >>> >>> are available in the git repository at: >>> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-drivers-soc-srom-pmu-4.6 >>> >>> for you to fetch changes up to 74a6659e8bf193066ba6bf365de66baa897aebb1: >>> >>> drivers: soc: Add support for Exynos PMU driver (2016-01-25 10:46:59 +0900) >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> A set of changes adding new drivers under drivers/soc/samsung: >>> >>> 1. Split code for handling SROM registers out of arm/mach-exynos >>> in to separate SROM controller driver under drivers/soc/samsung. >>> The driver will save and restore SROM registers during Suspend >>> to RAM. >>> >>> 2. Add to this SROM controller driver support for bank configuration >>> used by child devices. This allows usage of SMSC9115 Ethernet chip >>> on SMDK5410 (Exynos5410) directly connected to SROM controller. >> >> Hi, >> >> OMAP has GPMC drivers under drivers/memory. I wonder if SROM should go there >> too, since it's a quite similar bus. > > I wish I get this feedback before, when we were discussing the SROM > patches. :/ Yeah, I apologize -- I usually don't have the bandwidth to follow all discussions, so I have to catch them when the pull requests come in. I usually look up the discussions, this time I didn't. > > Indeed this sounds reasonable. On some boards the omap-gpmc is used for > the same purpose: interfacing to smsc,lan9115 (like on SMDK5410). > > >> Feel free to respin this without SROM now, so we can get the other pieces in >> sooner and then revisit the SROM asyncronously. That'll remove the dependencies >> on DT as well. > > Okay, I'll rebase all drivers/soc branches and respin the pull request > so PMU driver and other stuff could go in. > > BTW, just in case, although PMU stands for "Power Management Unit" I > don't think it should be placed under drivers/power because it is not a > avs/charger/battery/reset driver. Existing power-related drivers are > under driver/soc (bcm, dove, tegra). > > Re-work of SROM drivers could be started on top of it. Sounds good, and yes -- those sound appropriate to have under drivers/soc at least at this time. (At some point in time we'll have to go through and cleanup drivers/soc, but we're letting it grow at the moment). -Olof
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "pankaj.dubey" <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 05:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r5Vzb-6MZ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1342554 |
Hi Krzysztof, On Thursday 25 February 2016 06:13 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 25.02.2016 07:22, Olof Johansson wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 09:34:02AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> Hi Arnd, Kevin and Olof, >>> >>> This finally moves SROM controller and PMU code to separate >>> driver under drivers/soc/samsung. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Krzysztof >>> >>> >>> The following changes since commit 92e963f50fc74041b5e9e744c330dca48e04f08d: >>> >>> Linux 4.5-rc1 (2016-01-24 13:06:47 -0800) >>> >>> are available in the git repository at: >>> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git tags/samsung-drivers-soc-srom-pmu-4.6 >>> >>> for you to fetch changes up to 74a6659e8bf193066ba6bf365de66baa897aebb1: >>> >>> drivers: soc: Add support for Exynos PMU driver (2016-01-25 10:46:59 +0900) >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> A set of changes adding new drivers under drivers/soc/samsung: >>> >>> 1. Split code for handling SROM registers out of arm/mach-exynos >>> in to separate SROM controller driver under drivers/soc/samsung. >>> The driver will save and restore SROM registers during Suspend >>> to RAM. >>> >>> 2. Add to this SROM controller driver support for bank configuration >>> used by child devices. This allows usage of SMSC9115 Ethernet chip >>> on SMDK5410 (Exynos5410) directly connected to SROM controller. >> >> Hi, >> >> OMAP has GPMC drivers under drivers/memory. I wonder if SROM should go there >> too, since it's a quite similar bus. > > I wish I get this feedback before, when we were discussing the SROM > patches. :/ > > Indeed this sounds reasonable. On some boards the omap-gpmc is used for > the same purpose: interfacing to smsc,lan9115 (like on SMDK5410). > > >> Feel free to respin this without SROM now, so we can get the other pieces in >> sooner and then revisit the SROM asyncronously. That'll remove the dependencies >> on DT as well. > > Okay, I'll rebase all drivers/soc branches and respin the pull request > so PMU driver and other stuff could go in. > > BTW, just in case, although PMU stands for "Power Management Unit" I > don't think it should be placed under drivers/power because it is not a > avs/charger/battery/reset driver. Existing power-related drivers are > under driver/soc (bcm, dove, tegra). > > Re-work of SROM drivers could be started on top of it. > Please let me know if I need to take care of any of this work. Thanks, Pankaj Dubey > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 06:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r5WbU-71R-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1342789 |
On 25.02.2016 13:19, pankaj.dubey wrote: > Hi Krzysztof, > >>> >>> OMAP has GPMC drivers under drivers/memory. I wonder if SROM should go there >>> too, since it's a quite similar bus. >> >> I wish I get this feedback before, when we were discussing the SROM >> patches. :/ >> >> Indeed this sounds reasonable. On some boards the omap-gpmc is used for >> the same purpose: interfacing to smsc,lan9115 (like on SMDK5410). >> >> >>> Feel free to respin this without SROM now, so we can get the other pieces in >>> sooner and then revisit the SROM asyncronously. That'll remove the dependencies >>> on DT as well. >> >> Okay, I'll rebase all drivers/soc branches and respin the pull request >> so PMU driver and other stuff could go in. >> >> BTW, just in case, although PMU stands for "Power Management Unit" I >> don't think it should be placed under drivers/power because it is not a >> avs/charger/battery/reset driver. Existing power-related drivers are >> under driver/soc (bcm, dove, tegra). >> >> Re-work of SROM drivers could be started on top of it. >> > > Please let me know if I need to take care of any of this work. Yes, unfortunately I need your help with that. I rebased mach-exynos/drivers-soc related patches and pushed it to my next/soc branch: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=next/soc There are some changes in commits, mostly for movement of PMU driver (now it is applied first, before SROMc driver). I also applied some of the cleanup and maintainer patches from SROMc patchset. DT changes are already merged. Overall, could you rebase remaining patches on top of my next/soc and move SROM driver to drivers/memory? You can also rebase Pavel Fedin's patches (if you don't I will rebase them). Last version of applied SROMc patches is here: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=for-v4.6/drivers-soc-exynos-srom-pmu Best regards, Krzysztof
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web