Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1342495 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-24 23:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-25 18:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rtc: rtc-pic32: Add PIC32 real time clock driver Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2016-02-24 23:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rtc: rtc-pic32: Add PIC32 real time clock driver Joshua Henderson <joshua.henderson@microchip.com> - 2016-02-25 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rtc: rtc-pic32: Add PIC32 real time clock driver Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2016-02-25 18:00 +0100
| From | Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-24 23:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] rtc: rtc-pic32: Add PIC32 real time clock driver |
| Message-ID | <r5Q6t-2Im-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi,
On 19/02/2016 at 11:09:45 -0700, Joshua Henderson wrote :
> +static int pic32_rtc_gettime(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *rtc_tm)
> +{
> + struct pic32_rtc_dev *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + void __iomem *base = pdata->reg_base;
> + unsigned int tries = 0;
> +
> + clk_enable(pdata->clk);
> +
> + do {
> + rtc_tm->tm_hour = readb(base + PIC32_RTCHOUR);
> + rtc_tm->tm_min = readb(base + PIC32_RTCMIN);
> + rtc_tm->tm_mon = readb(base + PIC32_RTCMON);
> + rtc_tm->tm_mday = readb(base + PIC32_RTCDAY);
> + rtc_tm->tm_year = readb(base + PIC32_RTCYEAR);
> + rtc_tm->tm_sec = readb(base + PIC32_RTCSEC);
> +
> + /*
> + * The only way to work out whether the system was mid-update
> + * when we read it is to check the second counter, and if it
> + * is zero, then we re-try the entire read.
> + */
> + tries = 1;
> + } while (rtc_tm->tm_sec == 0 && tries < 2);
> +
This doesn't seem right. It will wait up to a second as tries will
always be less than 2, this is probably not what you want.
> + rtc_tm->tm_sec = bcd2bin(rtc_tm->tm_sec);
> + rtc_tm->tm_min = bcd2bin(rtc_tm->tm_min);
> + rtc_tm->tm_hour = bcd2bin(rtc_tm->tm_hour);
> + rtc_tm->tm_mday = bcd2bin(rtc_tm->tm_mday);
> + rtc_tm->tm_mon = bcd2bin(rtc_tm->tm_mon) - 1;
> + rtc_tm->tm_year = bcd2bin(rtc_tm->tm_year);
> +
> + rtc_tm->tm_year += 100;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "read time %04d.%02d.%02d %02d:%02d:%02d\n",
> + 1900 + rtc_tm->tm_year, rtc_tm->tm_mon, rtc_tm->tm_mday,
> + rtc_tm->tm_hour, rtc_tm->tm_min, rtc_tm->tm_sec);
> +
> + clk_disable(pdata->clk);
> + return rtc_valid_tm(rtc_tm);
> +}
> +
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joshua Henderson <joshua.henderson@microchip.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 17:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r66XF-6rB-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1342495 |
On 02/24/2016 03:25 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19/02/2016 at 11:09:45 -0700, Joshua Henderson wrote :
>> +static int pic32_rtc_gettime(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *rtc_tm)
>> +{
>> + struct pic32_rtc_dev *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> + void __iomem *base = pdata->reg_base;
>> + unsigned int tries = 0;
>> +
>> + clk_enable(pdata->clk);
>> +
>> + do {
>> + rtc_tm->tm_hour = readb(base + PIC32_RTCHOUR);
>> + rtc_tm->tm_min = readb(base + PIC32_RTCMIN);
>> + rtc_tm->tm_mon = readb(base + PIC32_RTCMON);
>> + rtc_tm->tm_mday = readb(base + PIC32_RTCDAY);
>> + rtc_tm->tm_year = readb(base + PIC32_RTCYEAR);
>> + rtc_tm->tm_sec = readb(base + PIC32_RTCSEC);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The only way to work out whether the system was mid-update
>> + * when we read it is to check the second counter, and if it
>> + * is zero, then we re-try the entire read.
>> + */
>> + tries = 1;
>> + } while (rtc_tm->tm_sec == 0 && tries < 2);
>> +
>
> This doesn't seem right. It will wait up to a second as tries will
> always be less than 2, this is probably not what you want.
Dang good catch. When fixed, it will work as expected:
# hwclock
tries 1
Sun Oct 17 19:23:59 2010 0.000000 seconds
# hwclock
tries 1
tries 2
Sun Oct 17 19:24:00 2010 0.000000 seconds
# hwclock
tries 1
Sun Oct 17 19:24:01 2010 0.000000 seconds
Josh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-25 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r67qG-6DX-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1343297 |
On 25/02/2016 at 09:23:55 -0700, Joshua Henderson wrote :
> On 02/24/2016 03:25 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 19/02/2016 at 11:09:45 -0700, Joshua Henderson wrote :
> >> +static int pic32_rtc_gettime(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *rtc_tm)
> >> +{
> >> + struct pic32_rtc_dev *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >> + void __iomem *base = pdata->reg_base;
> >> + unsigned int tries = 0;
> >> +
> >> + clk_enable(pdata->clk);
> >> +
> >> + do {
> >> + rtc_tm->tm_hour = readb(base + PIC32_RTCHOUR);
> >> + rtc_tm->tm_min = readb(base + PIC32_RTCMIN);
> >> + rtc_tm->tm_mon = readb(base + PIC32_RTCMON);
> >> + rtc_tm->tm_mday = readb(base + PIC32_RTCDAY);
> >> + rtc_tm->tm_year = readb(base + PIC32_RTCYEAR);
> >> + rtc_tm->tm_sec = readb(base + PIC32_RTCSEC);
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * The only way to work out whether the system was mid-update
> >> + * when we read it is to check the second counter, and if it
> >> + * is zero, then we re-try the entire read.
> >> + */
> >> + tries = 1;
> >> + } while (rtc_tm->tm_sec == 0 && tries < 2);
> >> +
> >
> > This doesn't seem right. It will wait up to a second as tries will
> > always be less than 2, this is probably not what you want.
>
> Dang good catch. When fixed, it will work as expected:
>
> # hwclock
> tries 1
> Sun Oct 17 19:23:59 2010 0.000000 seconds
> # hwclock
> tries 1
> tries 2
> Sun Oct 17 19:24:00 2010 0.000000 seconds
> # hwclock
> tries 1
> Sun Oct 17 19:24:01 2010 0.000000 seconds
>
Sure, just send v3, I'll apply it right away ;)
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web