Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1342258 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: ensure ngroups is initialized at correct place

Started byColin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
First post2016-02-24 18:40 +0100
Last post2016-02-25 19:40 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: ensure ngroups is initialized at correct place Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> - 2016-02-24 18:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: ensure ngroups is initialized at  correct place Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com> - 2016-02-25 19:40 +0100

#1342258 — [PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: ensure ngroups is initialized at correct place

FromColin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Date2016-02-24 18:40 +0100
Subject[PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: ensure ngroups is initialized at correct place
Message-ID<r5LzR-7Sl-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

The initialization of ngroups is occurring at the end of the
first iteration of the outer loop, which means that the
assignment  pins[ngroups++] = i is potentially indexing into
a region outside of array pins because ngroups is not initialized.
Instead, initialize ngroups in the inner loop before the first
inner loop iteration.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c
index f0bebbe..ed1cfa7 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c
@@ -1170,9 +1170,8 @@ static int lpc18xx_create_group_func_map(struct device *dev,
 	u16 pins[ARRAY_SIZE(lpc18xx_pins)];
 	int func, ngroups, i;
 
-	for (func = 0; func < FUNC_MAX; ngroups = 0, func++) {
-
-		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lpc18xx_pins); i++) {
+	for (func = 0; func < FUNC_MAX; func++) {
+		for (ngroups = 0, i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lpc18xx_pins); i++) {
 			if (lpc18xx_valid_pin_function(i, func))
 				pins[ngroups++] = i;
 		}
-- 
2.7.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1343382 — Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: ensure ngroups is initialized at correct place

FromJoachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-25 19:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] pinctrl: lpc18xx: ensure ngroups is initialized at correct place
Message-ID<r68Zr-7W1-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1342258
Hi Colin,

On 24 February 2016 at 18:32, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> The initialization of ngroups is occurring at the end of the
> first iteration of the outer loop, which means that the
> assignment  pins[ngroups++] = i is potentially indexing into
> a region outside of array pins because ngroups is not initialized.
> Instead, initialize ngroups in the inner loop before the first
> inner loop iteration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c
> index f0bebbe..ed1cfa7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-lpc18xx.c
> @@ -1170,9 +1170,8 @@ static int lpc18xx_create_group_func_map(struct device *dev,
>         u16 pins[ARRAY_SIZE(lpc18xx_pins)];
>         int func, ngroups, i;
>
> -       for (func = 0; func < FUNC_MAX; ngroups = 0, func++) {
> -
> -               for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lpc18xx_pins); i++) {
> +       for (func = 0; func < FUNC_MAX; func++) {
> +               for (ngroups = 0, i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lpc18xx_pins); i++) {

Good catch!

Reviewed-by: Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>


regards,
Joachim Eastwood

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web