Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1339368 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-22 20:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 on this page of 26 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[patch V2 00/28] x86/perf/intel/uncore|rapl: Fix error handling and sanitize pmu management Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
[patch V2 18/28] x86/perf/intel_rapl: Make Knights Landings support functional Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
Re: [patch V2 18/28] x86/perf/intel_rapl: Make Knights Landings support functional Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-02-22 21:40 +0100
[patch V2 13/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Clear all hardware state on exit Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
Re: [patch V2 13/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Clear all hardware state on exit Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-02-22 13:00 +0100
Re: [patch V2 13/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Clear all hardware state on exit Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 13:10 +0100
[patch V2 17/28] x86/perf/cqm: Get rid of the silly for_each_cpu lookups Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
[patch V2 16/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Make it modular Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
[patch V2 12/28] x86/perf/uncore: Track packages not per cpu data Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
[patch V2 24/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Make pmu lock raw Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
[patch V2 02/28] x86/perf/intel/uncore: Simplify error rollback Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
[patch V2 03/28] x86/perf/intel/uncore: Fix error handling Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
[patch V2 22/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Cleanup the printk output Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
Re: [patch V2 22/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Cleanup the printk output Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2016-02-22 19:50 +0100
Re: [patch V2 22/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Cleanup the printk output Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 20:00 +0100
[patch V2 08/28] x86/perf/uncore: Make uncore_pcibus_to_physid static Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
[patch V2 11/28] x86/topology: Create logical package id Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
Re: [patch V2 11/28] x86/topology: Create logical package id Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2016-02-22 20:00 +0100
Re: [patch V2 11/28] x86/topology: Create logical package id Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 20:10 +0100
[patch V2 14/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Make PCI and MSR uncore independent Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
[patch V2 23/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Refactor code some more Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
[patch V2 07/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Make code readable Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
[patch V2 20/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Sanitize the quirk handling Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
[patch V2 25/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Utilize event->pmu_private Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
[patch V2 05/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Cleanup hardware on exit Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100
Re: [patch V2 00/28] x86/perf/intel/uncore|rapl: Fix error handling and sanitize pmu management Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> - 2016-02-22 20:00 +0100
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [patch V2 23/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Refactor code some more |
| Message-ID | <r4WH1-4WG-55@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1339368 |
Split out code from init into seperate functions. Tidy up the code and get rid
of pointless comments. I wish there would be comments for code which is not
obvious....
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c | 61 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
Index: b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static ssize_t __rapl_##_var##_show(stru
static struct kobj_attribute format_attr_##_var = \
__ATTR(_name, 0444, __rapl_##_var##_show, NULL)
-#define RAPL_CNTR_WIDTH 32 /* 32-bit rapl counters */
+#define RAPL_CNTR_WIDTH 32
#define RAPL_EVENT_ATTR_STR(_name, v, str) \
static struct perf_pmu_events_attr event_attr_##v = { \
@@ -120,15 +120,16 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_attr event
};
struct rapl_pmu {
- spinlock_t lock;
- int n_active; /* number of active events */
- struct list_head active_list;
- struct pmu *pmu; /* pointer to rapl_pmu_class */
- ktime_t timer_interval; /* in ktime_t unit */
- struct hrtimer hrtimer;
+ spinlock_t lock;
+ int n_active;
+ struct list_head active_list;
+ struct pmu *pmu;
+ ktime_t timer_interval;
+ struct hrtimer hrtimer;
};
-static int rapl_hw_unit[NR_RAPL_DOMAINS] __read_mostly; /* 1/2^hw_unit Joule */
+ /* 1/2^hw_unit Joule */
+static int rapl_hw_unit[NR_RAPL_DOMAINS] __read_mostly;
static struct pmu rapl_pmu_class;
static cpumask_t rapl_cpu_mask;
static int rapl_cntr_mask;
@@ -200,11 +201,6 @@ static void rapl_start_hrtimer(struct ra
HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED);
}
-static void rapl_stop_hrtimer(struct rapl_pmu *pmu)
-{
- hrtimer_cancel(&pmu->hrtimer);
-}
-
static enum hrtimer_restart rapl_hrtimer_handle(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
{
struct rapl_pmu *pmu = __this_cpu_read(rapl_pmu);
@@ -216,9 +212,8 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart rapl_hrtimer
spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry(event, &pmu->active_list, active_entry) {
+ list_for_each_entry(event, &pmu->active_list, active_entry)
rapl_event_update(event);
- }
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
@@ -275,7 +270,7 @@ static void rapl_pmu_event_stop(struct p
WARN_ON_ONCE(pmu->n_active <= 0);
pmu->n_active--;
if (pmu->n_active == 0)
- rapl_stop_hrtimer(pmu);
+ hrtimer_cancel(&pmu->hrtimer);
list_del(&event->active_entry);
@@ -542,7 +537,7 @@ static void rapl_cpu_exit(int cpu)
perf_pmu_migrate_context(pmu->pmu, cpu, target);
/* cancel overflow polling timer for CPU */
- rapl_stop_hrtimer(pmu);
+ hrtimer_cancel(&pmu->hrtimer);
}
static void rapl_cpu_init(int cpu)
@@ -698,6 +693,20 @@ static void __init rapl_advertise(void)
}
}
+static int __init rapl_prepare_cpus(void)
+{
+ unsigned int cpu;
+ int ret;
+
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ ret = rapl_cpu_prepare(cpu);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ rapl_cpu_init(cpu);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void __init cleanup_rapl_pmus(void)
{
int cpu;
@@ -706,7 +715,7 @@ static void __init cleanup_rapl_pmus(voi
kfree(per_cpu(rapl_pmu, cpu));
}
-static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_cpu_match[] = {
+static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_cpu_match[] __initconst = {
[0] = { .vendor = X86_VENDOR_INTEL, .family = 6 },
[1] = {},
};
@@ -714,15 +723,11 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_cpu_
static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
{
void (*quirk)(void) = NULL;
- int cpu, ret;
+ int ret;
- /*
- * check for Intel processor family 6
- */
if (!x86_match_cpu(rapl_cpu_match))
return -ENODEV;
- /* check supported CPU */
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
case 42: /* Sandy Bridge */
case 58: /* Ivy Bridge */
@@ -751,7 +756,6 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
rapl_pmu_events_group.attrs = rapl_events_knl_attr;
break;
default:
- /* unsupported */
return -ENODEV;
}
@@ -761,12 +765,9 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
- for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
- ret = rapl_cpu_prepare(cpu);
- if (ret)
- goto out;
- rapl_cpu_init(cpu);
- }
+ ret = rapl_prepare_cpus();
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
ret = perf_pmu_register(&rapl_pmu_class, "power", -1);
if (ret)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [patch V2 07/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Make code readable |
| Message-ID | <r4WH1-4WG-57@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1339368 |
Cleanup the code a bit before reworking it completely.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 95 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
Index: b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
@@ -217,7 +217,8 @@ u64 uncore_shared_reg_config(struct inte
return config;
}
-static void uncore_assign_hw_event(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_event *event, int idx)
+static void uncore_assign_hw_event(struct intel_uncore_box *box,
+ struct perf_event *event, int idx)
{
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
@@ -312,18 +313,19 @@ static void uncore_pmu_init_hrtimer(stru
box->hrtimer.function = uncore_pmu_hrtimer;
}
-static struct intel_uncore_box *uncore_alloc_box(struct intel_uncore_type *type, int node)
+static struct intel_uncore_box *uncore_alloc_box(struct intel_uncore_type *type,
+ int node)
{
+ int i, size, numshared = type->num_shared_regs ;
struct intel_uncore_box *box;
- int i, size;
- size = sizeof(*box) + type->num_shared_regs * sizeof(struct intel_uncore_extra_reg);
+ size = sizeof(*box) + numshared * sizeof(struct intel_uncore_extra_reg);
box = kzalloc_node(size, GFP_KERNEL, node);
if (!box)
return NULL;
- for (i = 0; i < type->num_shared_regs; i++)
+ for (i = 0; i < numshared; i++)
raw_spin_lock_init(&box->shared_regs[i].lock);
uncore_pmu_init_hrtimer(box);
@@ -351,7 +353,8 @@ static bool is_uncore_event(struct perf_
}
static int
-uncore_collect_events(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_event *leader, bool dogrp)
+uncore_collect_events(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_event *leader,
+ bool dogrp)
{
struct perf_event *event;
int n, max_count;
@@ -412,7 +415,8 @@ uncore_get_event_constraint(struct intel
return &type->unconstrainted;
}
-static void uncore_put_event_constraint(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_event *event)
+static void uncore_put_event_constraint(struct intel_uncore_box *box,
+ struct perf_event *event)
{
if (box->pmu->type->ops->put_constraint)
box->pmu->type->ops->put_constraint(box, event);
@@ -592,7 +596,7 @@ static void uncore_pmu_event_del(struct
if (event == box->event_list[i]) {
uncore_put_event_constraint(box, event);
- while (++i < box->n_events)
+ for (++i; i < box->n_events; i++)
box->event_list[i - 1] = box->event_list[i];
--box->n_events;
@@ -801,10 +805,8 @@ static void __init uncore_type_exit(stru
static void __init uncore_types_exit(struct intel_uncore_type **types)
{
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; types[i]; i++)
- uncore_type_exit(types[i]);
+ for (; *types; types++)
+ uncore_type_exit(*types);
}
static int __init uncore_type_init(struct intel_uncore_type *type)
@@ -908,9 +910,11 @@ static int uncore_pci_probe(struct pci_d
* some device types. Hence PCI device idx would be 0 for all devices.
* So increment pmu pointer to point to an unused array element.
*/
- if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 87)
+ if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model == 87) {
while (pmu->func_id >= 0)
pmu++;
+ }
+
if (pmu->func_id < 0)
pmu->func_id = pdev->devfn;
else
@@ -1170,44 +1174,45 @@ static int uncore_cpu_prepare(int cpu, i
return 0;
}
-static void
-uncore_change_context(struct intel_uncore_type **uncores, int old_cpu, int new_cpu)
+static void uncore_change_type_ctx(struct intel_uncore_type *type, int old_cpu,
+ int new_cpu)
{
- struct intel_uncore_type *type;
- struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu;
+ struct intel_uncore_pmu *pmu = type->pmus;
struct intel_uncore_box *box;
- int i, j;
-
- for (i = 0; uncores[i]; i++) {
- type = uncores[i];
- for (j = 0; j < type->num_boxes; j++) {
- pmu = &type->pmus[j];
- if (old_cpu < 0)
- box = uncore_pmu_to_box(pmu, new_cpu);
- else
- box = uncore_pmu_to_box(pmu, old_cpu);
- if (!box)
- continue;
+ int i;
- if (old_cpu < 0) {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(box->cpu != -1);
- box->cpu = new_cpu;
- continue;
- }
+ for (i = 0; i < type->num_boxes; i++, pmu++) {
+ if (old_cpu < 0)
+ box = uncore_pmu_to_box(pmu, new_cpu);
+ else
+ box = uncore_pmu_to_box(pmu, old_cpu);
+ if (!box)
+ continue;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(box->cpu != old_cpu);
- if (new_cpu >= 0) {
- uncore_pmu_cancel_hrtimer(box);
- perf_pmu_migrate_context(&pmu->pmu,
- old_cpu, new_cpu);
- box->cpu = new_cpu;
- } else {
- box->cpu = -1;
- }
+ if (old_cpu < 0) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(box->cpu != -1);
+ box->cpu = new_cpu;
+ continue;
}
+
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(box->cpu != old_cpu);
+ box->cpu = -1;
+ if (new_cpu < 0)
+ continue;
+
+ uncore_pmu_cancel_hrtimer(box);
+ perf_pmu_migrate_context(&pmu->pmu, old_cpu, new_cpu);
+ box->cpu = new_cpu;
}
}
+static void uncore_change_context(struct intel_uncore_type **uncores,
+ int old_cpu, int new_cpu)
+{
+ for (; *uncores; uncores++)
+ uncore_change_type_ctx(*uncores, old_cpu, new_cpu);
+}
+
static void uncore_event_exit_cpu(int cpu)
{
int i, phys_id, target;
@@ -1313,8 +1318,8 @@ static int __init uncore_msr_pmus_regist
struct intel_uncore_type **types = uncore_msr_uncores;
int ret;
- while (*types) {
- ret = type_pmu_register(*types++);
+ for (; *types; types++) {
+ ret = type_pmu_register(*types);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [patch V2 20/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Sanitize the quirk handling |
| Message-ID | <r4WH2-4WG-63@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1339368 |
There is no point in having a quirk machinery for a single possible
function. Get rid of it and move the quirk to a place where it makes actually
sense.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c | 49 ++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
Index: b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
@@ -133,7 +133,6 @@ static int rapl_cntr_mask;
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rapl_pmu *, rapl_pmu);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rapl_pmu *, rapl_pmu_to_free);
-static struct x86_pmu_quirk *rapl_quirks;
static inline u64 rapl_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
{
u64 raw;
@@ -141,15 +140,6 @@ static inline u64 rapl_read_counter(stru
return raw;
}
-#define rapl_add_quirk(func_) \
-do { \
- static struct x86_pmu_quirk __quirk __initdata = { \
- .func = func_, \
- }; \
- __quirk.next = rapl_quirks; \
- rapl_quirks = &__quirk; \
-} while (0)
-
static inline u64 rapl_scale(u64 v, int cfg)
{
if (cfg > NR_RAPL_DOMAINS) {
@@ -564,17 +554,6 @@ static void rapl_cpu_init(int cpu)
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &rapl_cpu_mask);
}
-static __init void rapl_hsw_server_quirk(void)
-{
- /*
- * DRAM domain on HSW server has fixed energy unit which can be
- * different than the unit from power unit MSR.
- * "Intel Xeon Processor E5-1600 and E5-2600 v3 Product Families, V2
- * of 2. Datasheet, September 2014, Reference Number: 330784-001 "
- */
- rapl_hw_unit[RAPL_IDX_RAM_NRG_STAT] = 16;
-}
-
static int rapl_cpu_prepare(int cpu)
{
struct rapl_pmu *pmu = per_cpu(rapl_pmu, cpu);
@@ -672,7 +651,18 @@ static int rapl_cpu_notifier(struct noti
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
-static int rapl_check_hw_unit(void)
+static __init void rapl_hsw_server_quirk(void)
+{
+ /*
+ * DRAM domain on HSW server has fixed energy unit which can be
+ * different than the unit from power unit MSR.
+ * "Intel Xeon Processor E5-1600 and E5-2600 v3 Product Families, V2
+ * of 2. Datasheet, September 2014, Reference Number: 330784-001 "
+ */
+ rapl_hw_unit[RAPL_IDX_RAM_NRG_STAT] = 16;
+}
+
+static int rapl_check_hw_unit(void (*quirk)(void))
{
u64 msr_rapl_power_unit_bits;
int i;
@@ -683,6 +673,9 @@ static int rapl_check_hw_unit(void)
for (i = 0; i < NR_RAPL_DOMAINS; i++)
rapl_hw_unit[i] = (msr_rapl_power_unit_bits >> 8) & 0x1FULL;
+ /* Apply cpu model quirk */
+ if (quirk)
+ quirk();
return 0;
}
@@ -701,9 +694,9 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_cpu_
static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
{
+ void (*quirk)(void) = NULL;
struct rapl_pmu *pmu;
int cpu, ret;
- struct x86_pmu_quirk *quirk;
int i;
/*
@@ -720,7 +713,7 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
rapl_pmu_events_group.attrs = rapl_events_cln_attr;
break;
case 63: /* Haswell-Server */
- rapl_add_quirk(rapl_hsw_server_quirk);
+ quirk = rapl_hsw_server_quirk;
rapl_cntr_mask = RAPL_IDX_SRV;
rapl_pmu_events_group.attrs = rapl_events_srv_attr;
break;
@@ -736,7 +729,7 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
rapl_pmu_events_group.attrs = rapl_events_srv_attr;
break;
case 87: /* Knights Landing */
- rapl_add_quirk(rapl_hsw_server_quirk);
+ quirk = rapl_hsw_server_quirk;
rapl_cntr_mask = RAPL_IDX_KNL;
rapl_pmu_events_group.attrs = rapl_events_knl_attr;
break;
@@ -745,14 +738,10 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
return -ENODEV;
}
- ret = rapl_check_hw_unit();
+ ret = rapl_check_hw_unit(quirk);
if (ret)
return ret;
- /* run cpu model quirks */
- for (quirk = rapl_quirks; quirk; quirk = quirk->next)
- quirk->func();
-
cpu_notifier_register_begin();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [patch V2 25/28] x86/perf/intel/rapl: Utilize event->pmu_private |
| Message-ID | <r4WH2-4WG-65@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1339368 |
Store the pmu in event->pmu_private and use it instead of the per cpu
data. Preparatory step to get rid of the per cpu allocations.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_attr event
struct rapl_pmu {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
int n_active;
+ int cpu;
struct list_head active_list;
struct pmu *pmu;
ktime_t timer_interval;
@@ -203,7 +204,7 @@ static void rapl_start_hrtimer(struct ra
static enum hrtimer_restart rapl_hrtimer_handle(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
{
- struct rapl_pmu *pmu = __this_cpu_read(rapl_pmu);
+ struct rapl_pmu *pmu = container_of(hrtimer, struct rapl_pmu, hrtimer);
struct perf_event *event;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -249,7 +250,7 @@ static void __rapl_pmu_event_start(struc
static void rapl_pmu_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
{
- struct rapl_pmu *pmu = __this_cpu_read(rapl_pmu);
+ struct rapl_pmu *pmu = event->pmu_private;
unsigned long flags;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
@@ -259,7 +260,7 @@ static void rapl_pmu_event_start(struct
static void rapl_pmu_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
{
- struct rapl_pmu *pmu = __this_cpu_read(rapl_pmu);
+ struct rapl_pmu *pmu = event->pmu_private;
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -293,7 +294,7 @@ static void rapl_pmu_event_stop(struct p
static int rapl_pmu_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
{
- struct rapl_pmu *pmu = __this_cpu_read(rapl_pmu);
+ struct rapl_pmu *pmu = event->pmu_private;
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -316,6 +317,7 @@ static void rapl_pmu_event_del(struct pe
static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
{
+ struct rapl_pmu *pmu = __this_cpu_read(rapl_pmu);
u64 cfg = event->attr.config & RAPL_EVENT_MASK;
int bit, msr, ret = 0;
@@ -327,6 +329,9 @@ static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct pe
if (event->attr.config & ~RAPL_EVENT_MASK)
return -EINVAL;
+ if (event->cpu < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
/*
* check event is known (determines counter)
*/
@@ -365,6 +370,8 @@ static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct pe
return -EINVAL;
/* must be done before validate_group */
+ event->cpu = pmu->cpu;
+ event->pmu_private = pmu;
event->hw.event_base = msr;
event->hw.config = cfg;
event->hw.idx = bit;
@@ -572,6 +579,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_prepare(int cpu)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pmu->active_list);
pmu->pmu = &rapl_pmu_class;
+ pmu->cpu = cpu;
pmu->timer_interval = ms_to_ktime(rapl_timer_ms);
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 12:20 +0100 |
| Subject | [patch V2 05/28] x86/perf/intel_uncore: Cleanup hardware on exit |
| Message-ID | <r4WH2-4WG-67@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1339368 |
When tearing down the boxes nothing undoes the hardware state which was setup
by box->init_box(). Add a box->exit_box() callback and implement it for the
uncores which have an init_box() callback.
This misses the cleanup in the error exit pathes, but I cannot be bothered to
implement it before cleaning up the rest of the driver, which makes that task
way simpler.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
V2: Removed the code which affects IVB and newer as Liang pointed out that
it's incorrect
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 6 +++++-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h | 9 +++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_nhmex.c | 6 ++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c | 13 +++++++++++++
4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
@@ -937,6 +937,7 @@ static int uncore_pci_probe(struct pci_d
raw_spin_lock(&uncore_box_lock);
list_del(&box->list);
raw_spin_unlock(&uncore_box_lock);
+ uncore_box_exit(box);
kfree(box);
}
return ret;
@@ -982,6 +983,7 @@ static void uncore_pci_remove(struct pci
}
WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_read(&box->refcnt) != 1);
+ uncore_box_exit(box);
kfree(box);
if (last_box)
@@ -1091,8 +1093,10 @@ static void uncore_cpu_dying(int cpu)
pmu = &type->pmus[j];
box = *per_cpu_ptr(pmu->box, cpu);
*per_cpu_ptr(pmu->box, cpu) = NULL;
- if (box && atomic_dec_and_test(&box->refcnt))
+ if (box && atomic_dec_and_test(&box->refcnt)) {
list_add(&box->list, &boxes_to_free);
+ uncore_box_exit(box);
+ }
}
}
}
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.h
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ struct intel_uncore_type {
struct intel_uncore_ops {
void (*init_box)(struct intel_uncore_box *);
+ void (*exit_box)(struct intel_uncore_box *);
void (*disable_box)(struct intel_uncore_box *);
void (*enable_box)(struct intel_uncore_box *);
void (*disable_event)(struct intel_uncore_box *, struct perf_event *);
@@ -306,6 +307,14 @@ static inline void uncore_box_init(struc
}
}
+static inline void uncore_box_exit(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
+{
+ if (test_and_clear_bit(UNCORE_BOX_FLAG_INITIATED, &box->flags)) {
+ if (box->pmu->type->ops->exit_box)
+ box->pmu->type->ops->exit_box(box);
+ }
+}
+
static inline bool uncore_box_is_fake(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
{
return (box->phys_id < 0);
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_nhmex.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_nhmex.c
@@ -201,6 +201,11 @@ static void nhmex_uncore_msr_init_box(st
wrmsrl(NHMEX_U_MSR_PMON_GLOBAL_CTL, NHMEX_U_PMON_GLOBAL_EN_ALL);
}
+static void nhmex_uncore_msr_exit_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
+{
+ wrmsrl(NHMEX_U_MSR_PMON_GLOBAL_CTL, 0);
+}
+
static void nhmex_uncore_msr_disable_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
{
unsigned msr = uncore_msr_box_ctl(box);
@@ -250,6 +255,7 @@ static void nhmex_uncore_msr_enable_even
#define NHMEX_UNCORE_OPS_COMMON_INIT() \
.init_box = nhmex_uncore_msr_init_box, \
+ .exit_box = nhmex_uncore_msr_exit_box, \
.disable_box = nhmex_uncore_msr_disable_box, \
.enable_box = nhmex_uncore_msr_enable_box, \
.disable_event = nhmex_uncore_msr_disable_event, \
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore_snb.c
@@ -95,6 +95,12 @@ static void snb_uncore_msr_init_box(stru
}
}
+static void snb_uncore_msr_exit_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
+{
+ if (box->pmu->pmu_idx == 0)
+ wrmsrl(SNB_UNC_PERF_GLOBAL_CTL, 0);
+}
+
static struct uncore_event_desc snb_uncore_events[] = {
INTEL_UNCORE_EVENT_DESC(clockticks, "event=0xff,umask=0x00"),
{ /* end: all zeroes */ },
@@ -116,6 +122,7 @@ static struct attribute_group snb_uncore
static struct intel_uncore_ops snb_uncore_msr_ops = {
.init_box = snb_uncore_msr_init_box,
+ .exit_box = snb_uncore_msr_exit_box,
.disable_event = snb_uncore_msr_disable_event,
.enable_event = snb_uncore_msr_enable_event,
.read_counter = uncore_msr_read_counter,
@@ -231,6 +238,11 @@ static void snb_uncore_imc_init_box(stru
box->hrtimer_duration = UNCORE_SNB_IMC_HRTIMER_INTERVAL;
}
+static void snb_uncore_imc_exit_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
+{
+ iounmap(box->io_addr);
+}
+
static void snb_uncore_imc_enable_box(struct intel_uncore_box *box)
{}
@@ -458,6 +470,7 @@ static struct pmu snb_uncore_imc_pmu = {
static struct intel_uncore_ops snb_uncore_imc_ops = {
.init_box = snb_uncore_imc_init_box,
+ .exit_box = snb_uncore_imc_exit_box,
.enable_box = snb_uncore_imc_enable_box,
.disable_box = snb_uncore_imc_disable_box,
.disable_event = snb_uncore_imc_disable_event,
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-22 20:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [patch V2 00/28] x86/perf/intel/uncore|rapl: Fix error handling and sanitize pmu management |
| Message-ID | <r53Sa-1FT-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1339368 |
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> writes: > This series addresses the following issues: FWIW I did a quick read through the series, and except where commented it looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web