Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1339485 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 1/8] arm64: move acpi/dt decision earlier in boot process

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  [PATCH 1/8] arm64: move acpi/dt decision earlier in boot process Aleksey Makarov <aleksey.makarov@linaro.org> - 2016-02-22 14:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/8] arm64: move acpi/dt decision earlier in boot process Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> - 2016-02-22 16:50 +0100

#1339485 — [PATCH 1/8] arm64: move acpi/dt decision earlier in boot process

From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>

In order to support selecting earlycon via either ACPI or DT, move
the decision on whether to attempt ACPI configuration into the
early_param handling. Then make acpi_boot_table_init() bail out if
acpi_disabled.

Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
index d1ce8e2..7a944f7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
@@ -44,6 +44,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_disabled);
 static bool param_acpi_off __initdata;
 static bool param_acpi_force __initdata;
 
+static int __init dt_scan_depth1_nodes(unsigned long node,
+				       const char *uname, int depth,
+				       void *data)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Return 1 as soon as we encounter a node at depth 1 that is
+	 * not the /chosen node.
+	 */
+	if (depth == 1 && (strcmp(uname, "chosen") != 0))
+		return 1;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg)
 {
 	if (!arg)
@@ -57,23 +70,27 @@ static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg)
 	else
 		return -EINVAL;	/* Core will print when we return error */
 
-	return 0;
-}
-early_param("acpi", parse_acpi);
+	/*
+	 * Enable ACPI instead of device tree unless
+	 * - ACPI has been disabled explicitly (acpi=off), or
+	 * - the device tree is not empty (it has more than just a /chosen node)
+	 *   and ACPI has not been force enabled (acpi=force)
+	 */
+	if (param_acpi_off ||
+	    (!param_acpi_force && of_scan_flat_dt(dt_scan_depth1_nodes, NULL)))
+		return 0;
 
-static int __init dt_scan_depth1_nodes(unsigned long node,
-				       const char *uname, int depth,
-				       void *data)
-{
 	/*
-	 * Return 1 as soon as we encounter a node at depth 1 that is
-	 * not the /chosen node.
+	 * ACPI is disabled at this point. Enable it in order to parse
+	 * the ACPI tables and carry out sanity checks
 	 */
-	if (depth == 1 && (strcmp(uname, "chosen") != 0))
-		return 1;
+	enable_acpi();
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
+early_param("acpi", parse_acpi);
+
 /*
  * __acpi_map_table() will be called before page_init(), so early_ioremap()
  * or early_memremap() should be called here to for ACPI table mapping.
@@ -181,23 +198,10 @@ out:
  */
 void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void)
 {
-	/*
-	 * Enable ACPI instead of device tree unless
-	 * - ACPI has been disabled explicitly (acpi=off), or
-	 * - the device tree is not empty (it has more than just a /chosen node)
-	 *   and ACPI has not been force enabled (acpi=force)
-	 */
-	if (param_acpi_off ||
-	    (!param_acpi_force && of_scan_flat_dt(dt_scan_depth1_nodes, NULL)))
+	if (acpi_disabled)
 		return;
 
 	/*
-	 * ACPI is disabled at this point. Enable it in order to parse
-	 * the ACPI tables and carry out sanity checks
-	 */
-	enable_acpi();
-
-	/*
 	 * If ACPI tables are initialized and FADT sanity checks passed,
 	 * leave ACPI enabled and carry on booting; otherwise disable ACPI
 	 * on initialization error.
-- 
2.7.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1339665

On 22/02/16 14:46, Aleksey Makarov wrote:
> From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
>
> In order to support selecting earlycon via either ACPI or DT, move
> the decision on whether to attempt ACPI configuration into the
> early_param handling. Then make acpi_boot_table_init() bail out if
> acpi_disabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>   1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> index d1ce8e2..7a944f7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_pci_disabled);
>   static bool param_acpi_off __initdata;
>   static bool param_acpi_force __initdata;
>
> +static int __init dt_scan_depth1_nodes(unsigned long node,
> +				       const char *uname, int depth,
> +				       void *data)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Return 1 as soon as we encounter a node at depth 1 that is
> +	 * not the /chosen node.
> +	 */
> +	if (depth == 1 && (strcmp(uname, "chosen") != 0))
> +		return 1;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg)
>   {
>   	if (!arg)
> @@ -57,23 +70,27 @@ static int __init parse_acpi(char *arg)
>   	else
>   		return -EINVAL;	/* Core will print when we return error */
>
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -early_param("acpi", parse_acpi);
> +	/*
> +	 * Enable ACPI instead of device tree unless
> +	 * - ACPI has been disabled explicitly (acpi=off), or
> +	 * - the device tree is not empty (it has more than just a /chosen node)
> +	 *   and ACPI has not been force enabled (acpi=force)
> +	 */
> +	if (param_acpi_off ||
> +	    (!param_acpi_force && of_scan_flat_dt(dt_scan_depth1_nodes, NULL)))
> +		return 0;
>
> -static int __init dt_scan_depth1_nodes(unsigned long node,
> -				       const char *uname, int depth,
> -				       void *data)
> -{
>   	/*
> -	 * Return 1 as soon as we encounter a node at depth 1 that is
> -	 * not the /chosen node.
> +	 * ACPI is disabled at this point. Enable it in order to parse
> +	 * the ACPI tables and carry out sanity checks
>   	 */
> -	if (depth == 1 && (strcmp(uname, "chosen") != 0))
> -		return 1;
> +	enable_acpi();
> +

So we only enable ACPI if we pass acpi=force as kernel parameter?
I'm not sure if this is what you wanted to do.

Regards,
Matthias

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web