Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1333012 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities

Started byWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
First post2016-02-12 19:40 +0100
Last post2016-02-22 14:50 +0100
Articles 6 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-02-12 19:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-02-12 19:50 +0100
    RE: [PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities "Sricharan" <sricharan@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-13 08:00 +0100
    RE: [PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities "Sricharan" <sricharan@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-22 13:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-02-22 13:40 +0100
        RE: [PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities "Sricharan" <sricharan@codeaurora.org> - 2016-02-22 14:50 +0100

#1333012 — Re: [PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities

FromWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date2016-02-12 19:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities
Message-ID<r1qNk-2ew-23@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:32:44PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> QUP cores can be attached to a BAM module, which acts as
> a dma engine for the QUP core. When DMA with BAM is enabled,
> the BAM consumer pipe transmitted data is written to the
> output FIFO and the BAM producer pipe received data is read
> from the input FIFO.
> 
> With BAM capabilities, qup-i2c core can transfer more than
> 256 bytes, without a 'stop' which is not possible otherwise.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
> Tested-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
> Tested-by: Telkar Nagender <ntelkar@codeaurora.org>

My code checkers found some issues:

    SPARSE
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:555:6: warning: symbol 'qup_sg_set_buf' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1243:50: warning: dubious: !x & !y
    SMATCH
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:165 qup_sg_set_buf warn: unused return: s = sg_next()
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:165 qup_sg_set_buf warn: unused return: s = sg_next()
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1243 qup_i2c_xfer_v2() warn: add some parenthesis here?
    CPPCHECK
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1243: style: Boolean result is used in bitwise operation. Clarify expression with parentheses.
    SPATCH
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1380:2-13: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1481:1-13: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1
  CC      drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.o
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:555:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'qup_sg_set_buf' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
 void qup_sg_set_buf(struct scatterlist *sg, void *buf, struct qup_i2c_tag *tg,

Can you fix them and resend??

Thanks,

   Wolfram

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1333031

FromWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date2016-02-12 19:50 +0100
Message-ID<r1qX1-2kB-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1333012

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

> Can you fix them and resend??

That should have been only one '?', sorry.


[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1333281

From"Sricharan" <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
Date2016-02-13 08:00 +0100
Message-ID<r1Clt-1eu-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1333012
Hi Wolfram,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:wsa@the-dreams.de]
> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 12:08 AM
> To: Sricharan R
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org;
> agross@codeaurora.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> i2c@vger.kernel.org; iivanov@mm-sol.com; galak@codeaurora.org;
> dmaengine@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> andy.gross@linaro.org; ntelkar@codeaurora.org; architt@codeaurora.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities
> 
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:32:44PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> > QUP cores can be attached to a BAM module, which acts as a dma engine
> > for the QUP core. When DMA with BAM is enabled, the BAM consumer
> pipe
> > transmitted data is written to the output FIFO and the BAM producer
> > pipe received data is read from the input FIFO.
> >
> > With BAM capabilities, qup-i2c core can transfer more than
> > 256 bytes, without a 'stop' which is not possible otherwise.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
> > Tested-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
> > Tested-by: Telkar Nagender <ntelkar@codeaurora.org>
> 
> My code checkers found some issues:
> 
>     SPARSE
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:555:6: warning: symbol 'qup_sg_set_buf' was
> not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1243:50: warning: dubious: !x & !y
>     SMATCH
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:165 qup_sg_set_buf warn: unused return: s =
> sg_next()
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:165 qup_sg_set_buf warn: unused return: s =
> sg_next()
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1243 qup_i2c_xfer_v2() warn: add some
> parenthesis here?
>     CPPCHECK
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1243: style: Boolean result is used in
bitwise
> operation. Clarify expression with parentheses.
>     SPATCH
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1380:2-13: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1481:1-13: WARNING: Assignment of bool to 0/1
>   CC      drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.o
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:555:6: warning: no previous prototype for
> 'qup_sg_set_buf' [-Wmissing-prototypes]  void qup_sg_set_buf(struct
> scatterlist *sg, void *buf, struct qup_i2c_tag *tg,
> 
> Can you fix them and resend??

    Sorry on this , will resend this patch.

Regards,
 Sricharan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1339439

From"Sricharan" <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
Date2016-02-22 13:30 +0100
Message-ID<r4XMJ-5Nd-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1333012
Hi Wolfram,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sricharan [mailto:sricharan@codeaurora.org]
> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 12:29 PM
> To: 'Wolfram Sang'
> Cc: 'devicetree@vger.kernel.org'; 'linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org';
> 'agross@codeaurora.org'; 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'; 'linux-
> i2c@vger.kernel.org'; 'iivanov@mm-sol.com'; 'galak@codeaurora.org';
> 'dmaengine@vger.kernel.org'; 'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org';
> 'andy.gross@linaro.org'; 'ntelkar@codeaurora.org';
'architt@codeaurora.org'
> Subject: RE: [PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities
> 
> Hi Wolfram,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:wsa@the-dreams.de]
> > Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 12:08 AM
> > To: Sricharan R
> > Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org;
> > agross@codeaurora.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > i2c@vger.kernel.org; iivanov@mm-sol.com; galak@codeaurora.org;
> > dmaengine@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org;
> > andy.gross@linaro.org; ntelkar@codeaurora.org; architt@codeaurora.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 4/6] i2c: qup: Add bam dma capabilities
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 03:32:44PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> > > QUP cores can be attached to a BAM module, which acts as a dma
> > > engine for the QUP core. When DMA with BAM is enabled, the BAM
> > > consumer
> > pipe
> > > transmitted data is written to the output FIFO and the BAM producer
> > > pipe received data is read from the input FIFO.
> > >
> > > With BAM capabilities, qup-i2c core can transfer more than
> > > 256 bytes, without a 'stop' which is not possible otherwise.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>
> > > Tested-by: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>
> > > Tested-by: Telkar Nagender <ntelkar@codeaurora.org>
> >
> > My code checkers found some issues:
> >
> >     SPARSE
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:555:6: warning: symbol 'qup_sg_set_buf'
> > was not declared. Should it be static?
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1243:50: warning: dubious: !x & !y
> >     SMATCH
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:165 qup_sg_set_buf warn: unused return: s
> > =
> > sg_next()
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:165 qup_sg_set_buf warn: unused return: s
> > =
> > sg_next()
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1243 qup_i2c_xfer_v2() warn: add some
> > parenthesis here?
> >     CPPCHECK
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1243: style: Boolean result is used in
> > bitwise operation. Clarify expression with parentheses.
> >     SPATCH
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1380:2-13: WARNING: Assignment of bool to
> > 0/1
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:1481:1-13: WARNING: Assignment of bool to
> 0/1
> >   CC      drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.o
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c:555:6: warning: no previous prototype for
> > 'qup_sg_set_buf' [-Wmissing-prototypes]  void qup_sg_set_buf(struct
> > scatterlist *sg, void *buf, struct qup_i2c_tag *tg,
> >
> > Can you fix them and resend??
> 
  Really sorry for the delay ,  sent it here [1]

  Also, while testing this series in one of a new platform, found that an
additional 
  Regression and a fix is required on top of this series. So can I send a
separate fix on top of this series ?


[1]   https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/586125/

Regards,
 Sricharan

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1339445

FromWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date2016-02-22 13:40 +0100
Message-ID<r4XWq-5Qy-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1339439

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

>   Regression and a fix is required on top of this series. So can I send a
> separate fix on top of this series ?

Yes, do it like this. And please quote only relevant parts of a mail.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1339476

From"Sricharan" <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
Date2016-02-22 14:50 +0100
Message-ID<r4Z2a-6yP-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1339445
Hi Wolfram,

> >   Regression and a fix is required on top of this series. So can I
> > send a separate fix on top of this series ?
> 
> Yes, do it like this. And please quote only relevant parts of a mail.
   Ok, will send a fix separately.   Sorry for the noisy reply previously ..


Regards,
 Sricharan

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web