Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1337654 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCHv2 3/4] ARM: tegra: use build-in device properties with rfkill_gpio

Started byJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
First post2016-02-18 21:10 +0100
Last post2016-02-19 19:10 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCHv2 3/4] ARM: tegra: use build-in device properties with  rfkill_gpio Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> - 2016-02-18 21:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCHv2 3/4] ARM: tegra: use build-in device properties with  rfkill_gpio Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2016-02-19 19:10 +0100

#1337654 — Re: [PATCHv2 3/4] ARM: tegra: use build-in device properties with rfkill_gpio

FromJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Date2016-02-18 21:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCHv2 3/4] ARM: tegra: use build-in device properties with rfkill_gpio
Message-ID<r3D3I-2sr-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 09:42 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 13:18 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >  
> > Johannes, I assume that you'll want to take this through your tree
> > because of the dependency? In that case:
> > 
> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> 
> I can, but I don't really care - perhaps you'd rather take the entire
> series through your tree to get it into one place for Marc?
> 
> In which case, you have my
> 
> Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> 
> for the other 3 patches.
> 
> Let me know which you prefer.
> 
Did these patches get applied anywhere? Otherwise I'm willing to pick
them up.

johannes

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1338398

FromThierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-19 19:10 +0100
Message-ID<r3XF7-Nm-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1337654

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 09:04:49PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 09:42 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 13:18 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >  
> > > Johannes, I assume that you'll want to take this through your tree
> > > because of the dependency? In that case:
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> > 
> > I can, but I don't really care - perhaps you'd rather take the entire
> > series through your tree to get it into one place for Marc?
> > 
> > In which case, you have my
> > 
> > Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> > 
> > for the other 3 patches.
> > 
> > Let me know which you prefer.
> > 
> Did these patches get applied anywhere? Otherwise I'm willing to pick
> them up.

Might be easier for everyone if you took this one patch. My earlier
Acked-by still stands:

Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web