Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1332292 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-11 19:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-15 17:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH v4 05/23] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN feature Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-02-11 19:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 05/23] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN feature Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2016-02-15 17:20 +0100
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-11 19:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v4 05/23] arm64: Add ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN feature |
| Message-ID | <r14ts-4eC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Add a new ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN features to indicate that the
CPU has the ARMv8.1 VHE capability.
This will be used to trigger kernel patching in KVM.
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 3 ++-
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 11 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 8f271b8..c705d6a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -30,8 +30,9 @@
#define ARM64_HAS_LSE_ATOMICS 5
#define ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_23154 6
#define ARM64_WORKAROUND_834220 7
+#define ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN 8
-#define ARM64_NCAPS 8
+#define ARM64_NCAPS 9
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 5c90aa4..ba74519 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <asm/sysreg.h>
+#include <asm/virt.h>
unsigned long elf_hwcap __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(elf_hwcap);
@@ -621,6 +622,11 @@ static bool has_useable_gicv3_cpuif(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry)
return has_sre;
}
+static bool runs_at_el2(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *entry)
+{
+ return is_kernel_in_hyp_mode();
+}
+
static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
{
.desc = "GIC system register CPU interface",
@@ -651,6 +657,11 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
.min_field_value = 2,
},
#endif /* CONFIG_AS_LSE && CONFIG_ARM64_LSE_ATOMICS */
+ {
+ .desc = "Virtualization Host Extensions",
+ .capability = ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN,
+ .matches = runs_at_el2,
+ },
{},
};
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 17:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r2u2t-3n5-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1332292 |
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 06:39:46PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Add a new ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN features to indicate that the > CPU has the ARMv8.1 VHE capability. > > This will be used to trigger kernel patching in KVM. > > Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org> > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 3 ++- > arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 11 +++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h > index 8f271b8..c705d6a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h > @@ -30,8 +30,9 @@ > #define ARM64_HAS_LSE_ATOMICS 5 > #define ARM64_WORKAROUND_CAVIUM_23154 6 > #define ARM64_WORKAROUND_834220 7 > +#define ARM64_HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN 8 > > -#define ARM64_NCAPS 8 > +#define ARM64_NCAPS 9 Just a heads up, but this conflicts with the for-next/core branch, where I used cap 8 to identify the absence of a h/w prefetcher. Will
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web