Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1334417 > unrolled thread

Re: Re: [PATCH RESEND] arm64: add alignment fault hanling

Started byEunTaik Lee <eun.taik.lee@samsung.com>
First post2016-02-15 12:50 +0100
Last post2016-02-15 12:50 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  Re: Re: [PATCH RESEND] arm64: add alignment fault hanling EunTaik Lee <eun.taik.lee@samsung.com> - 2016-02-15 12:50 +0100

#1334417 — Re: Re: [PATCH RESEND] arm64: add alignment fault hanling

FromEunTaik Lee <eun.taik.lee@samsung.com>
Date2016-02-15 12:50 +0100
SubjectRe: Re: [PATCH RESEND] arm64: add alignment fault hanling
Message-ID<r2pPc-ky-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
> How do you end up with Device nGnRnE in user space? I thought we should
> have got some guard page.
I guess it is a device file that is mmaped in the user space and later remapped in the kernel
 using pgprot_noncached(). 
I can't find the code that inserts a guard page in between vma's can you please help me find that code?

> do_strncpy_from_user() relies on unsafe_get_user() not being able to
> read 8 bytes. The problem now is that it doesn't get a page fault but an
> alignment one is isn't handled.
Yes.

> Why addr >= TASK_SIZE? addr here should be the fault address, not pc.
You're right. I should have used user_mode(regs).

> The simplest would be to use do_bad_area() here without any additional
> function.
Yes, I should've probably used do_bad_area(). I just wanted to do the minimal stuff.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web