Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1334273 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH v1 0/6] rockchip: power-domain: fix pm domain for support RK3399 SoC Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com> - 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100
[PATCH v1 4/6] dt/bindings: power: add RK3399 SoCs header for power-domain Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com> - 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100
[PATCH v1 3/6] rockchip: power-domain: add support for sub-power domains Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com> - 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] rockchip: power-domain: add support for sub-power domains Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@kernel-upstream.org> - 2016-02-15 11:10 +0100
[PATCH v1 2/6] rockchip: power-domain: allow domains only handling idle requests Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com> - 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100
[PATCH v1 1/6] rockchip: power-domain: make idle handling optional Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com> - 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100
| From | Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v1 0/6] rockchip: power-domain: fix pm domain for support RK3399 SoC |
| Message-ID | <r2n10-6UV-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
fix some idle handling support sub-power domain add rk3399-power.h modify power domain for RK3399 SoC modify document for RK3399 Soc Elaine Zhang (6): rockchip: power-domain: make idle handling optional rockchip: power-domain: allow domains only handling idle requests rockchip: power-domain: add support for sub-power domains dt/bindings: power: add RK3399 SoCs header for power-domain rockchip: power-domain: Modify power domain driver for rk3399 dt/bindings: rockchip: modify document of Rockchip power domains .../bindings/soc/rockchip/power_domain.txt | 21 ++++ drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++- include/dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h | 53 +++++++++ 3 files changed, 197 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h -- 1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v1 4/6] dt/bindings: power: add RK3399 SoCs header for power-domain |
| Message-ID | <r2n10-6UV-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1334273 |
According to a description from TRM, add all the power domains Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com> --- include/dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..69fbd67 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/dt-bindings/power/rk3399-power.h @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +#ifndef __DT_BINDINGS_POWER_RK3399_POWER_H__ +#define __DT_BINDINGS_POWER_RK3399_POWER_H__ + +/* VD_CORE_L */ +#define RK3399_PD_A53_L0 0 +#define RK3399_PD_A53_L1 1 +#define RK3399_PD_A53_L2 2 +#define RK3399_PD_A53_L3 3 +#define RK3399_PD_SCU_L 4 + +/* VD_CORE_B */ +#define RK3399_PD_A72_B0 5 +#define RK3399_PD_A72_B1 6 +#define RK3399_PD_SCU_B 7 + +/* VD_CENTER */ +#define RK3399_PD_CENTER 8 +#define RK3399_PD_VCODEC 9 +#define RK3399_PD_RGA 10 +#define RK3399_PD_IEP 11 +#define RK3399_PD_VDU 12 + +/* VD_LOGIC */ +#define RK3399_PD_PERILP 13 +#define RK3399_PD_PERIHP 14 +#define RK3399_PD_VIO 15 +#define RK3399_PD_VO 16 +#define RK3399_PD_VOPB 17 +#define RK3399_PD_VOPL 18 +#define RK3399_PD_ISP0 19 +#define RK3399_PD_ISP1 20 +#define RK3399_PD_HDCP 21 +#define RK3399_PD_TCPD0 22 +#define RK3399_PD_TCPD1 23 +#define RK3399_PD_GIC 24 +#define RK3399_PD_ALIVE 25 +#define RK3399_PD_USB3 26 +#define RK3399_PD_SD 27 +#define RK3399_PD_CCI 28 +#define RK3399_PD_CCI0 29 +#define RK3399_PD_CCI1 30 +#define RK3399_PD_GMAC 31 +#define RK3399_PD_EMMC 32 +#define RK3399_PD_EDP 33 +#define RK3399_PD_SDIOAUDIO 34 + +/* VD_GPU */ +#define RK3399_PD_GPU 35 + +/* VD_PMU */ +#define RK3399_PD_PMU 36 + +#endif -- 1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v1 3/6] rockchip: power-domain: add support for sub-power domains |
| Message-ID | <r2n11-6UV-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1334273 |
This patch adds support for making one power domain a sub-domain of
other domain. This is useful for modeling power dependences,
which needs to have more than one power domain enabled to be operational.
Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
---
drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
index 350527b..c4c2aea 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
@@ -372,6 +372,51 @@ static void rockchip_configure_pd_cnt(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu,
regmap_write(pmu->regmap, domain_reg_offset + 4, count);
}
+static int rockchip_pm_add_subdomain(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu,
+ struct device_node *parent)
+{
+ struct device_node *np;
+ int error;
+
+ for_each_child_of_node(parent, np) {
+ struct generic_pm_domain *child_domain, *parent_domain;
+ u32 idx = ~0;
+
+ if (of_property_read_u32(parent, "reg", &idx)) {
+ dev_err(pmu->dev,
+ "%s: failed to retrieve domain id (reg)\n",
+ parent->name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ parent_domain = pmu->genpd_data.domains[idx];
+
+ error = rockchip_pm_add_one_domain(pmu, np);
+ if (error) {
+ dev_err(pmu->dev, "failed to handle node %s: %d\n",
+ np->name, error);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ if (of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", &idx)) {
+ dev_err(pmu->dev,
+ "%s: failed to retrieve domain id (reg)\n",
+ np->name);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ child_domain = pmu->genpd_data.domains[idx];
+
+ if (pm_genpd_add_subdomain(parent_domain, child_domain))
+ pr_warn("%s failed to add subdomain: %s\n",
+ parent_domain->name, child_domain->name);
+ else
+ pr_warn("%s add subdomain: %s\n",
+ parent_domain->name, child_domain->name);
+
+ rockchip_pm_add_subdomain(pmu, np);
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int rockchip_pm_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
@@ -437,6 +482,12 @@ static int rockchip_pm_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
node->name, error);
goto err_out;
}
+ error = rockchip_pm_add_subdomain(pmu, node);
+ if (error < 0) {
+ dev_err(dev, "failed to handle subdomain node %s: %d\n",
+ node->name, error);
+ goto err_out;
+ }
}
if (error) {
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@kernel-upstream.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 11:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 3/6] rockchip: power-domain: add support for sub-power domains |
| Message-ID | <r2ogr-7VA-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1334277 |
在 2016/2/15 16:38, Elaine Zhang 写道:
> This patch adds support for making one power domain a sub-domain of
> other domain. This is useful for modeling power dependences,
> which needs to have more than one power domain enabled to be operational.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
> index 350527b..c4c2aea 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
> @@ -372,6 +372,51 @@ static void rockchip_configure_pd_cnt(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu,
> regmap_write(pmu->regmap, domain_reg_offset + 4, count);
> }
>
> +static int rockchip_pm_add_subdomain(struct rockchip_pmu *pmu,
> + struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + int error;
> +
> + for_each_child_of_node(parent, np) {
> + struct generic_pm_domain *child_domain, *parent_domain;
> + u32 idx = ~0;
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(parent, "reg", &idx)) {
> + dev_err(pmu->dev,
> + "%s: failed to retrieve domain id (reg)\n",
> + parent->name);
> + return -EINVAL;
miss of_node_put.
> + }
> + parent_domain = pmu->genpd_data.domains[idx];
> +
> + error = rockchip_pm_add_one_domain(pmu, np);
> + if (error) {
> + dev_err(pmu->dev, "failed to handle node %s: %d\n",
> + np->name, error);
> + return -ENODEV;
Ditto
> + }
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", &idx)) {
> + dev_err(pmu->dev,
> + "%s: failed to retrieve domain id (reg)\n",
> + np->name);
> + return -EINVAL;
Ditto
> + }
> + child_domain = pmu->genpd_data.domains[idx];
> +
> + if (pm_genpd_add_subdomain(parent_domain, child_domain))
> + pr_warn("%s failed to add subdomain: %s\n",
> + parent_domain->name, child_domain->name);
> + else
> + pr_warn("%s add subdomain: %s\n",
> + parent_domain->name, child_domain->name);
> +
> + rockchip_pm_add_subdomain(pmu, np);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int rockchip_pm_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -437,6 +482,12 @@ static int rockchip_pm_domain_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> node->name, error);
> goto err_out;
> }
> + error = rockchip_pm_add_subdomain(pmu, node);
> + if (error < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to handle subdomain node %s: %d\n",
> + node->name, error);
> + goto err_out;
> + }
> }
>
> if (error) {
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v1 2/6] rockchip: power-domain: allow domains only handling idle requests |
| Message-ID | <r2n11-6UV-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1334273 |
On some Rockchip SoC there exist child-domains only handling their
idle state with the actual power-state handled by a parent-domain.
So allow such types of domains. For them, we can determine their
state (on/of) by checking the inverse idle-state instead.
There exist one special case if both idle as well power handling
were set as not present, but as the domain-data is defined in the
code itself, we can expect the reasonable developer to define them
So allow such types of domains. For them, we can determine their
state (on/of) by checking the inverse idle-state instead.
There exist one special case if both idle as well power handling
were set as not present, but as the domain-data is defined in the
code itself, we can expect the reasonable developer to define them
in a correct, without adding more checks.
Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
---
drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
index 3dcc611..350527b 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
@@ -68,8 +68,8 @@ struct rockchip_pmu {
#define DOMAIN(pwr, status, req, idle, ack) \
{ \
- .pwr_mask = BIT(pwr), \
- .status_mask = BIT(status), \
+ .pwr_mask = (pwr >= 0) ? BIT(pwr) : OVERFLOW_MASK, \
+ .status_mask = (status >= 0) ? BIT(status) : OVERFLOW_MASK,\
.req_mask = (req >= 0) ? BIT(req) : OVERFLOW_MASK, \
.idle_mask = (idle >= 0) ? BIT(idle) : OVERFLOW_MASK, \
.ack_mask = (ack >= 0) ? BIT(ack) : OVERFLOW_MASK, \
@@ -121,6 +121,10 @@ static bool rockchip_pmu_domain_is_on(struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd)
struct rockchip_pmu *pmu = pd->pmu;
unsigned int val;
+ /* check idle status for idle-only domains */
+ if (pd->info->status_mask >= OVERFLOW_MASK)
+ return !rockchip_pmu_domain_is_idle(pd);
+
regmap_read(pmu->regmap, pmu->info->status_offset, &val);
/* 1'b0: power on, 1'b1: power off */
@@ -132,6 +136,9 @@ static void rockchip_do_pmu_set_power_domain(struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd,
{
struct rockchip_pmu *pmu = pd->pmu;
+ if (pd->info->pwr_mask >= OVERFLOW_MASK)
+ return;
+
regmap_update_bits(pmu->regmap, pmu->info->pwr_offset,
pd->info->pwr_mask, on ? 0 : -1U);
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-15 09:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v1 1/6] rockchip: power-domain: make idle handling optional |
| Message-ID | <r2n11-6UV-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1334273 |
Not all new socs need to handle idle states on domain state changes,
so add the possibility to make them optional.
Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
---
drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
index 6cdffb1..3dcc611 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/rockchip/pm_domains.c
@@ -63,14 +63,16 @@ struct rockchip_pmu {
};
#define to_rockchip_pd(gpd) container_of(gpd, struct rockchip_pm_domain, genpd)
+#define NULL_BIT -32
+#define OVERFLOW_MASK 32
#define DOMAIN(pwr, status, req, idle, ack) \
{ \
.pwr_mask = BIT(pwr), \
.status_mask = BIT(status), \
- .req_mask = BIT(req), \
- .idle_mask = BIT(idle), \
- .ack_mask = BIT(ack), \
+ .req_mask = (req >= 0) ? BIT(req) : OVERFLOW_MASK, \
+ .idle_mask = (idle >= 0) ? BIT(idle) : OVERFLOW_MASK, \
+ .ack_mask = (ack >= 0) ? BIT(ack) : OVERFLOW_MASK, \
}
#define DOMAIN_RK3288(pwr, status, req) \
@@ -96,6 +98,9 @@ static int rockchip_pmu_set_idle_request(struct rockchip_pm_domain *pd,
struct rockchip_pmu *pmu = pd->pmu;
unsigned int val;
+ if (pd_info->req_mask >= OVERFLOW_MASK)
+ return 0;
+
regmap_update_bits(pmu->regmap, pmu->info->req_offset,
pd_info->req_mask, idle ? -1U : 0);
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web