Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1334996 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-16 06:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-16 20:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [ANNOUNCE] 4.4.1-rt6 Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> - 2016-02-16 06:00 +0100
Re: [ANNOUNCE] 4.4.1-rt6 Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> - 2016-02-16 20:20 +0100
| From | Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 06:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [ANNOUNCE] 4.4.1-rt6 |
| Message-ID | <r2FTY-2Qt-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 00:47:08 +0100
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
> - There is a useless rcu_bh thread which has been deactivated.
>
For some strange reason I had RCU_TORTURE_TEST defined in my config. This caused my compile to blow up because kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c wanted to test the (now ifdef'ed out) rcu_bh routines. This fixes the compile issue but is untested for actually *running* rcutorture. I'll try that on a test box tomorrow.
Clark
From a835ff3aad772520d34548dc336925788a649b17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:48:04 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] rcutorture: comment out rcu_bh ops on PREEMPT_RT_FULL
RT has dropped support of rcu_bh, comment out in rcutorture.
Signed-off-by: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
---
kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index d89328e260df..5bb3364a6284 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -390,6 +390,7 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops rcu_ops = {
.name = "rcu"
};
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
/*
* Definitions for rcu_bh torture testing.
*/
@@ -429,6 +430,12 @@ static struct rcu_torture_ops rcu_bh_ops = {
.name = "rcu_bh"
};
+#else
+static struct rcu_torture_ops rcu_bh_ops = {
+ .ttype = INVALID_RCU_FLAVOR,
+};
+#endif
+
/*
* Don't even think about trying any of these in real life!!!
* The names includes "busted", and they really means it!
--
2.5.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-16 20:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r2Tke-3E0-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1334996 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 22:53:58 -0600 Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> wrote: > On Sat, 13 Feb 2016 00:47:08 +0100 > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote: > > > - There is a useless rcu_bh thread which has been deactivated. > > > > For some strange reason I had RCU_TORTURE_TEST defined in my config. This caused my compile to blow up because kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c wanted to test the (now ifdef'ed out) rcu_bh routines. This fixes the compile issue but is untested for actually *running* rcutorture. I'll try that on a test box tomorrow. > > Successfully ran rcutorture for 5m on my test system with no errors reported and no _bh_ threads started. Clark
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web