Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1331211 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] gpio: tps65086: Add GPO driver for the TPS65086 PMIC

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH] gpio: tps65086: Add GPO driver for the TPS65086 PMIC Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-02-10 15:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] gpio: tps65086: Add GPO driver for the TPS65086 PMIC Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-02-11 10:30 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] gpio: tps65086: Add GPO driver for the TPS65086 PMIC Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-02-16 00:10 +0100

#1331211 — Re: [PATCH] gpio: tps65086: Add GPO driver for the TPS65086 PMIC

On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com> wrote:

> Add support for the TPS65086 PMIC GPOs.
>
> TPS65086 has four configurable GPOs that can be used for several
> purposes. These are output only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
> ---
> This is the last component of the tps65086 series, other parts have
> been taken already, this will probably need to be taken through the
> MFD tree due to header dependencies.

Lee: go ahead.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1331779

On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com> wrote:
> 
> > Add support for the TPS65086 PMIC GPOs.
> >
> > TPS65086 has four configurable GPOs that can be used for several
> > purposes. These are output only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
> > ---
> > This is the last component of the tps65086 series, other parts have
> > been taken already, this will probably need to be taken through the
> > MFD tree due to header dependencies.
> 
> Lee: go ahead.
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Very well, applied.

I also know Linus W likes dicing with death, so this is going into my
main branch.  As this is a new driver, it shouldn't be an issue;
however, it does mean that any changes you make (hopefully none)
during this cycle will also have to come through the MFD tree.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1334865

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:

> Very well, applied.
>
> I also know Linus W likes dicing with death, so this is going into my
> main branch.  As this is a new driver, it shouldn't be an issue;

Haha as long as there are no collisions in Makefile or Kconfig it
should work out just fine I think.

If something blows up in -next we can set up an immutable branch.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web