Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1333104 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 25/33] x86, pkeys: add Kconfig prompt to existing config option

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  [PATCH 25/33] x86, pkeys: add Kconfig prompt to existing config option Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> - 2016-02-12 22:10 +0100
    [tip:mm/pkeys] x86/mm/pkeys:   Add Kconfig prompt to existing config option tip-bot for Dave Hansen <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2016-02-18 21:30 +0100

#1333104 — [PATCH 25/33] x86, pkeys: add Kconfig prompt to existing config option

From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>

I don't have a strong opinion on whether we need this or not.
Protection Keys has relatively little code associated with it,
and it is not a heavyweight feature to keep enabled.  However,
I can imagine that folks would still appreciate being able to
disable it.

Here's the option if folks want it.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---

 b/arch/x86/Kconfig |   10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff -puN arch/x86/Kconfig~pkeys-40-kconfig-prompt arch/x86/Kconfig
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig~pkeys-40-kconfig-prompt	2016-02-12 10:44:25.134653590 -0800
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig	2016-02-12 10:44:25.138653773 -0800
@@ -1715,8 +1715,18 @@ config X86_INTEL_MPX
 	  If unsure, say N.
 
 config X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
+	prompt "Intel Memory Protection Keys"
 	def_bool y
+	# Note: only available in 64-bit mode
 	depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL && X86_64
+	---help---
+	  Memory Protection Keys provides a mechanism for enforcing
+	  page-based protections, but without requiring modification of the
+	  page tables when an application changes protection domains.
+
+	  For details, see Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt
+
+	  If unsure, say y.
 
 config EFI
 	bool "EFI runtime service support"
_

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1337715 — [tip:mm/pkeys] x86/mm/pkeys: Add Kconfig prompt to existing config option

Commit-ID:  284244a9876225eb73102aff41d4492f65cb2868
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/284244a9876225eb73102aff41d4492f65cb2868
Author:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:02:28 -0800
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 19:46:30 +0100

x86/mm/pkeys: Add Kconfig prompt to existing config option

I don't have a strong opinion on whether we need this or not.
Protection Keys has relatively little code associated with it,
and it is not a heavyweight feature to keep enabled.  However,
I can imagine that folks would still appreciate being able to
disable it.

Here's the option if folks want it.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160212210228.7E79386C@viggo.jf.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/Kconfig | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index fb2ebeb..b875434 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1716,8 +1716,18 @@ config X86_INTEL_MPX
 	  If unsure, say N.
 
 config X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
+	prompt "Intel Memory Protection Keys"
 	def_bool y
+	# Note: only available in 64-bit mode
 	depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL && X86_64
+	---help---
+	  Memory Protection Keys provides a mechanism for enforcing
+	  page-based protections, but without requiring modification of the
+	  page tables when an application changes protection domains.
+
+	  For details, see Documentation/x86/protection-keys.txt
+
+	  If unsure, say y.
 
 config EFI
 	bool "EFI runtime service support"

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web