Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1333047 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-12 20:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-12 20:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 03/11] x86/mm/hotplug: Don't remove PGD entries in remove_pagetable() Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-02-12 20:10 +0100
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-12 20:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 03/11] x86/mm/hotplug: Don't remove PGD entries in remove_pagetable() |
| Message-ID | <r1rgl-2Ho-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > So when memory hotplug removes a piece of physical memory from pagetable > mappings, it also frees the underlying PGD entry. > > This complicates PGD management, so don't do this. We can keep the > PGD mapped and the PUD table all clear - it's only a single 4K page > per 512 GB of memory hotplugged. Ressurecting an ancient thread: I want this particular change to make it (much) easier to make vmapped stacks work correctly. Could it be applied by itself? --Andy
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web