Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1333043 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v3] dmi: Make dmi_walk and dmi_walk_early return real error codes

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v3] dmi: Make dmi_walk and dmi_walk_early return real  error codes Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-02-12 20:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3] dmi: Make dmi_walk and dmi_walk_early return real  error codes Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> - 2016-02-13 01:20 +0100

#1333043 — Re: [PATCH v3] dmi: Make dmi_walk and dmi_walk_early return real error codes

On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 08:18:50PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 10:13:09 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> wrote:
>> > > If I understand this correctly, this is the first of 5 patches, and this one has
>> > > some unanswered questions from Jean here. If this patch gets respun, the
>> > > following are also impacted:
>> > >
>> > > dell-wmi: Stop storing pointers to DMI tables
>> > > dell-wmi, dell-laptop: select DMI
>> > > dell-wmi: Clean up hotkey table size check
>> > > dell-wmi: Support new hotkeys on the XPS 13 9350 (Skylake)
>> > >
>> > > Is that correct?
>> >
>> > Not really.  It's just the three patches here:
>> >
>> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.platform.x86.devel/8503
>> >
>> > This patch (the dmi_walk error code one) is no longer really related.
>> > Due to Jean's earlier comment about what happens if DMI isn't enabled
>> > at all, I no longer propagate the error code from dmi_walk in
>> > dell-wmi, so the error code won't have any effect.  (Instead I just
>> > warn and let the driver load in legacy mode, which matches the current
>> > behavior.)
>> >
>> > I think the way to go is for the v3 "dell-wmi: DMI misuse fixes"
>> > series to go in through your tree, and I'll hash out the error code
>> > thing separately with Jean.
>> >
>> > Does that seem sensible?
>>
>> Yes, I agree that this patch is independent from the dell-wmi patch
>> series now.
>
> Excellent, works for me.
>

Is any further action from me needed here?

--Andy

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1333234

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:59:10AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 08:18:50PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> >> On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 10:13:09 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> wrote:
> >> > > If I understand this correctly, this is the first of 5 patches, and this one has
> >> > > some unanswered questions from Jean here. If this patch gets respun, the
> >> > > following are also impacted:
> >> > >
> >> > > dell-wmi: Stop storing pointers to DMI tables
> >> > > dell-wmi, dell-laptop: select DMI
> >> > > dell-wmi: Clean up hotkey table size check
> >> > > dell-wmi: Support new hotkeys on the XPS 13 9350 (Skylake)
> >> > >
> >> > > Is that correct?
> >> >
> >> > Not really.  It's just the three patches here:
> >> >
> >> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.platform.x86.devel/8503
> >> >
> >> > This patch (the dmi_walk error code one) is no longer really related.
> >> > Due to Jean's earlier comment about what happens if DMI isn't enabled
> >> > at all, I no longer propagate the error code from dmi_walk in
> >> > dell-wmi, so the error code won't have any effect.  (Instead I just
> >> > warn and let the driver load in legacy mode, which matches the current
> >> > behavior.)
> >> >
> >> > I think the way to go is for the v3 "dell-wmi: DMI misuse fixes"
> >> > series to go in through your tree, and I'll hash out the error code
> >> > thing separately with Jean.
> >> >
> >> > Does that seem sensible?
> >>
> >> Yes, I agree that this patch is independent from the dell-wmi patch
> >> series now.
> >
> > Excellent, works for me.
> >
> 
> Is any further action from me needed here?

Now that the Dell SMBIOS update is in (yesterday), I am looking for a
consolidated patch series from you, ending with the skylake support.

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web