Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1332676 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-12 12:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-12 12:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] power: cros_usbpd-charger: Add EC-based USB PD charger driver Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> - 2016-02-12 12:10 +0100
| From | Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-12 12:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] power: cros_usbpd-charger: Add EC-based USB PD charger driver |
| Message-ID | <r1jLP-6aQ-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 10 February 2016 at 17:49, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote: > On Fri, 05 Feb 2016, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> From: Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org> >> >> This driver exposes the charger functionality in the PD EC to userspace. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> >> Cc: Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org> >> Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org> >> Cc: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@chromium.org> >> --- >> >> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c | 37 ++ >> drivers/power/Kconfig | 10 + >> drivers/power/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/power/cros_usbpd-charger.c | 907 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h | 28 + >> include/linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h | 324 +++++++++++- >> 6 files changed, 1302 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 drivers/power/cros_usbpd-charger.c > > A 1300 line patch crossing 3 subsystems is not the way you should be > submitting code. Please split these up into separate commits. The > only time you should squash all this functionality into a single patch > is to mitigate otherwise unavoidable build issues. I do not believe > that's the case here. Agreed, sorry about that. Thanks, Tomeu
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web