Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1332367 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-11 22:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-11 22:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCHv3 1/3] rdmacg: Added rdma cgroup controller. Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@gmail.com> - 2016-02-11 22:20 +0100
| From | Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-11 22:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCHv3 1/3] rdmacg: Added rdma cgroup controller. |
| Message-ID | <r16OB-5Vk-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Haggai Eran <haggaie@mellanox.com> wrote: > > There is indeed an effort to backport the latest RDMA subsystem modules to > older kernels, and it would be preferable to be able to introduce new > resources through these modules. Right. There is hardly 10 to 20 lines of code that allows to support this functionality. So I think its good thing to have. > > If resources are defined by RDMA cgroup kernel than adding/removing > > resource means, someone have to do lot of engineering with different > > versions of kernel support and loadable module support using compat.h > > etc at driver level, which in my mind is some amount of engineering > > compare to what v5 has to offer and its already available. With one > > round of cleanup in resource definition, it should be usable. > If I understand correctly, if the resources are defined in the cgroup, > you simply won't be able to add new resources with a module update, > no matter how hard you work. > Yes.
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web