Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1331170 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-10 14:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-11 16:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH v2 0/7] irqchip: introduce the Alpine MSIX driver Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> - 2016-02-10 14:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] irqchip: introduce the Alpine MSIX driver Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-02-11 14:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] irqchip: introduce the Alpine MSIX driver Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> - 2016-02-11 16:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] irqchip: introduce the Alpine MSIX driver Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> - 2016-02-11 16:20 +0100
| From | Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 14:30 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2 0/7] irqchip: introduce the Alpine MSIX driver |
| Message-ID | <r0D0f-2IY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi all, This series introduce the Alpine MSIX driver, and enables it in both the Alpine v1 and Alpine v2 device trees. This series depends on "[PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: introduce the Alpine support": https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/10/83 You can find the series at: https://github.com/atenart/linux.git 4.5-rc1/alpinev2-msix Antoine Since v1: - Added an interrupt-parent property in the documentation example. - Updated to use bitmap_*() instead of *_bit(). - Removed the static irq_set_affinity to use irq_chip_set_affinity_parent(). - Updated the address field to use phys_addr_t. - Added a comment on why we're setting bit 16 in the address. - Patched the gic_set_affinity() function in irqchip/gic-v3. Antoine Tenart (7): irqchip/gic-v3: always return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE in gic_set_affinity irqchip: add the Alpine MSIX interrupt controller Documentation: bindings: document the Alpine MSIX driver arm64: dts: alpine: add the MSIX node in the Alpine v2 dtsi ARM: dts: alpine: add the MSIX node arm64: alpine: select the Alpine MSI controller driver arm: alpine: select the Alpine MSI controller driver .../interrupt-controller/al,alpine-msix.txt | 24 ++ arch/arm/boot/dts/alpine.dtsi | 10 + arch/arm/mach-alpine/Kconfig | 1 + arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 1 + arch/arm64/boot/dts/al/alpine-v2.dtsi | 10 + drivers/irqchip/Kconfig | 6 + drivers/irqchip/Makefile | 1 + drivers/irqchip/irq-alpine-msi.c | 293 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 2 +- 9 files changed, 347 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/al,alpine-msix.txt create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-alpine-msi.c -- 2.7.0
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-11 14:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r0ZN8-13S-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1331170 |
Antoine, On 10/02/16 13:22, Antoine Tenart wrote: > Hi all, > > This series introduce the Alpine MSIX driver, and enables it in both > the Alpine v1 and Alpine v2 device trees. > > This series depends on "[PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: introduce the Alpine support": > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/10/83 > > You can find the series at: > https://github.com/atenart/linux.git 4.5-rc1/alpinev2-msix So I'm quite happy with this as it is (modulo the documentation fix on patch 3). I can take the first 3 patches through my GIC tree, but the last 4 patches depend on your other series. Would it be a problem to get these 4 patches merged after 4.6-rc1, so that all the code can be merged before? Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-11 16:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r10ST-1KU-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1331954 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hello Marc, On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:41:48PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 10/02/16 13:22, Antoine Tenart wrote: > > > > This series introduce the Alpine MSIX driver, and enables it in both > > the Alpine v1 and Alpine v2 device trees. > > > > This series depends on "[PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: introduce the Alpine support": > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/10/83 > > > > You can find the series at: > > https://github.com/atenart/linux.git 4.5-rc1/alpinev2-msix > > So I'm quite happy with this as it is (modulo the documentation fix on > patch 3). I can take the first 3 patches through my GIC tree, but the > last 4 patches depend on your other series. I'll fix the documentation. > Would it be a problem to get these 4 patches merged after 4.6-rc1, so > that all the code can be merged before? I think we can live with that :) Thanks, Antoine -- Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-11 16:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r11ce-26P-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1332125 |
Hello, On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 15:45:44 +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 01:41:48PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On 10/02/16 13:22, Antoine Tenart wrote: > > > > > > This series introduce the Alpine MSIX driver, and enables it in both > > > the Alpine v1 and Alpine v2 device trees. > > > > > > This series depends on "[PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: introduce the Alpine support": > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/2/10/83 > > > > > > You can find the series at: > > > https://github.com/atenart/linux.git 4.5-rc1/alpinev2-msix > > > > So I'm quite happy with this as it is (modulo the documentation fix on > > patch 3). I can take the first 3 patches through my GIC tree, but the > > last 4 patches depend on your other series. > > I'll fix the documentation. > > > Would it be a problem to get these 4 patches merged after 4.6-rc1, so > > that all the code can be merged before? > > I think we can live with that :) Practically speaking, patches 4-7 have no build dependency on patches 1-3, so they can be merged independently. As long as the DT binding introduced in patches 1-3 is validated, then patches 4-7 can be merged in parallel. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web