Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1321897 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] irqchip: add support for Sigma Designs SMP86xx/SMP87xx interrupt controller

Started byMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
First post2016-01-29 18:20 +0100
Last post2016-02-09 11:00 +0100
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] irqchip: add support for Sigma Designs  SMP86xx/SMP87xx interrupt controller Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-01-29 18:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] irqchip: add support for Sigma Designs  SMP86xx/SMP87xx interrupt controller Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> - 2016-02-09 10:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] irqchip: add support for Sigma Designs  SMP86xx/SMP87xx interrupt controller Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-02-09 10:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] irqchip: add support for Sigma Designs  SMP86xx/SMP87xx interrupt controller Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> - 2016-02-09 11:00 +0100

#1321897 — Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] irqchip: add support for Sigma Designs SMP86xx/SMP87xx interrupt controller

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2016-01-29 18:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 2/2] irqchip: add support for Sigma Designs SMP86xx/SMP87xx interrupt controller
Message-ID<qWkSf-6po-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 20/01/16 18:07, Mans Rullgard wrote:
> This adds support for the secondary interrupt controller used in Sigma
> Designs SMP86xx and SMP87xx chips.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
> ---
> Changes from v3:
> - use of_address_to_resource() rather accessing "reg" property directly
> 
> Boot tested on SMP8643 (tango3) and SMP8759 (tango4)
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig     |   5 +
>  drivers/irqchip/Makefile    |   1 +
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-tango.c | 232 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 238 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-tango.c

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1329987

FromMarc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com>
Date2016-02-09 10:20 +0100
Message-ID<r0cCK-21t-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1321897
On 29/01/2016 18:10, Marc Zyngier wrote:

> On 20/01/16 18:07, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>
>> This adds support for the secondary interrupt controller used in Sigma
>> Designs SMP86xx and SMP87xx chips.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
>> ---
>> Changes from v3:
>> - use of_address_to_resource() rather accessing "reg" property directly

So, with this version, no changes are required to the DT node
written for earlier versions, right?

>>  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig     |   5 +
>>  drivers/irqchip/Makefile    |   1 +
>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-tango.c | 232 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  3 files changed, 238 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-tango.c
> 
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>

So, at some point, this driver should appear in one of the upstream
repositories, right?

linux-next? irq/core branch on tip?

https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/?h=irq/core
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/

Will it be included in Linux 4.6?

Regards.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1329997

FromMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date2016-02-09 10:40 +0100
Message-ID<r0cW6-28I-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1329987
On 09/02/16 09:12, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> On 29/01/2016 18:10, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> 
>> On 20/01/16 18:07, Mans Rullgard wrote:
>>
>>> This adds support for the secondary interrupt controller used in Sigma
>>> Designs SMP86xx and SMP87xx chips.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes from v3:
>>> - use of_address_to_resource() rather accessing "reg" property directly
> 
> So, with this version, no changes are required to the DT node
> written for earlier versions, right?
> 
>>>  drivers/irqchip/Kconfig     |   5 +
>>>  drivers/irqchip/Makefile    |   1 +
>>>  drivers/irqchip/irq-tango.c | 232 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  3 files changed, 238 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-tango.c
>>
>> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> 
> So, at some point, this driver should appear in one of the upstream
> repositories, right?
> 
> linux-next? irq/core branch on tip?
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/?h=irq/core
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/
> 

As I already said on IRC, one of us (Thomas, Jason or me) will queue it,
and it will eventually appear in the branches documented in the
MAINTAINERS file.

> Will it be included in Linux 4.6?

My crystal ball says "Probably".

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1330011

FromMarc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com>
Date2016-02-09 11:00 +0100
Message-ID<r0dfs-2gR-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1329997
On 09/02/2016 10:33, Marc Zyngier wrote:

> As I already said on IRC, one of us (Thomas, Jason or me) will queue it,
> and it will eventually appear in the branches documented in the
> MAINTAINERS file.

Thanks for bringing the T field in the MAINTAINERS file to my attention,
I had managed to never notice it until now. Doh!

When there are several T entries, it means they are frequently synced?

Regards.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web