Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1330729 > unrolled thread

[PATCH V3 4/5] perf/amd/iommu: Introduce get_iommu_bnk_cnt_evt_idx

Started bySuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
First post2016-02-10 00:00 +0100
Last post2016-02-10 17:50 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH V3 4/5] perf/amd/iommu: Introduce get_iommu_bnk_cnt_evt_idx Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> - 2016-02-10 00:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH V3 4/5] perf/amd/iommu: Introduce  get_iommu_bnk_cnt_evt_idx Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-02-10 17:50 +0100

#1330729 — [PATCH V3 4/5] perf/amd/iommu: Introduce get_iommu_bnk_cnt_evt_idx

FromSuravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
Date2016-02-10 00:00 +0100
Subject[PATCH V3 4/5] perf/amd/iommu: Introduce get_iommu_bnk_cnt_evt_idx
Message-ID<r0pqj-251-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
Introduce a helper function to calculate bit-index for assigning
performance counter assignment.

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_iommu.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_iommu.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_iommu.c
index 2d59e20..791bbcf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_iommu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_iommu.c
@@ -145,18 +145,28 @@ static struct attribute_group amd_iommu_cpumask_group = {
 
 /*---------------------------------------------*/
 
+static inline
+int get_iommu_bnk_cnt_evt_idx(struct perf_amd_iommu *perf_iommu,
+				  int iommu_index, int bank_index,
+				  int cntr_index)
+{
+	int cntrs_per_iommu = perf_iommu->max_banks * perf_iommu->max_counters;
+	int index = (perf_iommu->max_counters * bank_index) + cntr_index;
+
+	return (cntrs_per_iommu * iommu_index) + index;
+}
+
 static int get_next_avail_iommu_bnk_cntr(struct perf_amd_iommu *perf_iommu)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int shift, bank, cntr, retval;
-	int max_banks = perf_iommu->max_banks;
-	int max_cntrs = perf_iommu->max_counters;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&perf_iommu->lock, flags);
 
-	for (bank = 0, shift = 0; bank < max_banks; bank++) {
-		for (cntr = 0; cntr < max_cntrs; cntr++) {
-			shift = bank + (bank*3) + cntr;
+	for (bank = 0, shift = 0; bank < perf_iommu->max_banks; bank++) {
+		for (cntr = 0; cntr < perf_iommu->max_counters; cntr++) {
+			shift = get_iommu_bnk_cnt_evt_idx(perf_iommu,
+							      0, bank, cntr);
 			if (perf_iommu->cntr_assign_mask & (1ULL<<shift)) {
 				continue;
 			} else {
-- 
2.5.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1331321 — Re: [PATCH V3 4/5] perf/amd/iommu: Introduce get_iommu_bnk_cnt_evt_idx

FromBorislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date2016-02-10 17:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH V3 4/5] perf/amd/iommu: Introduce get_iommu_bnk_cnt_evt_idx
Message-ID<r0G7M-4Gb-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1330729
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 04:53:54PM -0600, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> Introduce a helper function to calculate bit-index for assigning
> performance counter assignment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_iommu.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_iommu.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_iommu.c
> index 2d59e20..791bbcf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_iommu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_iommu.c
> @@ -145,18 +145,28 @@ static struct attribute_group amd_iommu_cpumask_group = {
>  
>  /*---------------------------------------------*/
>  
> +static inline
> +int get_iommu_bnk_cnt_evt_idx(struct perf_amd_iommu *perf_iommu,
> +				  int iommu_index, int bank_index,
> +				  int cntr_index)
> +{
> +	int cntrs_per_iommu = perf_iommu->max_banks * perf_iommu->max_counters;
> +	int index = (perf_iommu->max_counters * bank_index) + cntr_index;
> +
> +	return (cntrs_per_iommu * iommu_index) + index;
> +}
> +
>  static int get_next_avail_iommu_bnk_cntr(struct perf_amd_iommu *perf_iommu)
>  {
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	int shift, bank, cntr, retval;
> -	int max_banks = perf_iommu->max_banks;
> -	int max_cntrs = perf_iommu->max_counters;
>  
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&perf_iommu->lock, flags);
>  
> -	for (bank = 0, shift = 0; bank < max_banks; bank++) {
> -		for (cntr = 0; cntr < max_cntrs; cntr++) {
> -			shift = bank + (bank*3) + cntr;
> +	for (bank = 0, shift = 0; bank < perf_iommu->max_banks; bank++) {
> +		for (cntr = 0; cntr < perf_iommu->max_counters; cntr++) {
> +			shift = get_iommu_bnk_cnt_evt_idx(perf_iommu,
> +							      0, bank, cntr);

You don't need to break this line - let it stick out.


-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web