Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1331135 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-02-10 14:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-02-10 15:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 16/23] perf hists browser: Count number of hierarchy entries Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> - 2016-02-10 14:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 16/23] perf hists browser: Count number of hierarchy entries Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> - 2016-02-10 15:50 +0100
| From | Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 14:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 16/23] perf hists browser: Count number of hierarchy entries |
| Message-ID | <r0Cxd-2iO-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:01:48PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
SNIP
> +static int hierarchy_count_rows(struct hist_browser *hb, struct hist_entry *he,
> + bool include_children)
> +{
> + int count = 0;
> + struct rb_node *node;
> + struct hist_entry *child;
> +
> + if (he->leaf)
> + return callchain__count_rows(&he->sorted_chain);
> +
> + node = rb_first(&he->hroot_out);
> + while (node) {
> + float percent;
> +
> + child = rb_entry(node, struct hist_entry, rb_node);
> + percent = hist_entry__get_percent_limit(child);
> +
> + if (!child->filtered && percent >= hb->min_pcnt) {
> + count++;
> +
> + if (include_children && child->unfolded)
> + count += hierarchy_count_rows(hb, child, true);
> + }
> +
> + node = rb_next(node);
> + }
> + return count;
> +}
SNIP
> + if (he->leaf)
> + browser->nr_callchain_rows -= he->nr_rows;
> else
> + browser->nr_hierarchy_entries -= he->nr_rows;
> +
> + if (symbol_conf.report_hierarchy)
> + child_rows = hierarchy_count_rows(browser, he, true);
> +
> + if (he->unfolded) {
> + if (he->leaf)
> + he->nr_rows = callchain__count_rows(&he->sorted_chain);
> + else
> + he->nr_rows = hierarchy_count_rows(browser, he, false);
looks like above condition could go to just following call:
he->nr_rows = hierarchy_count_rows(browser, he, false);
because there's same condtiion in the hierarchy_count_rows function
thanks,
jirka
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-10 15:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <r0EfE-3qm-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1331135 |
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 01:52:08PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:01:48PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > +static int hierarchy_count_rows(struct hist_browser *hb, struct hist_entry *he,
> > + bool include_children)
> > +{
> > + int count = 0;
> > + struct rb_node *node;
> > + struct hist_entry *child;
> > +
> > + if (he->leaf)
> > + return callchain__count_rows(&he->sorted_chain);
> > +
> > + node = rb_first(&he->hroot_out);
> > + while (node) {
> > + float percent;
> > +
> > + child = rb_entry(node, struct hist_entry, rb_node);
> > + percent = hist_entry__get_percent_limit(child);
> > +
> > + if (!child->filtered && percent >= hb->min_pcnt) {
> > + count++;
> > +
> > + if (include_children && child->unfolded)
> > + count += hierarchy_count_rows(hb, child, true);
> > + }
> > +
> > + node = rb_next(node);
> > + }
> > + return count;
> > +}
>
> SNIP
>
> > + if (he->leaf)
> > + browser->nr_callchain_rows -= he->nr_rows;
> > else
> > + browser->nr_hierarchy_entries -= he->nr_rows;
> > +
> > + if (symbol_conf.report_hierarchy)
> > + child_rows = hierarchy_count_rows(browser, he, true);
> > +
> > + if (he->unfolded) {
> > + if (he->leaf)
> > + he->nr_rows = callchain__count_rows(&he->sorted_chain);
> > + else
> > + he->nr_rows = hierarchy_count_rows(browser, he, false);
>
> looks like above condition could go to just following call:
>
> he->nr_rows = hierarchy_count_rows(browser, he, false);
>
> because there's same condtiion in the hierarchy_count_rows function
That's true. But I wrote it that way since it's aligned with other
part of the code.
Thanks,
Namhyung
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web