Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1328737 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/8] staging: fsl-mc: static inline function to differentiate root dprc

Started byGreg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
First post2016-02-08 04:40 +0100
Last post2016-02-09 04:40 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/8] staging: fsl-mc: static inline function to  differentiate root dprc Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-02-08 04:40 +0100
    RE: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/8] staging: fsl-mc: static inline function to  differentiate root dprc Lijun Pan <lijun.pan@nxp.com> - 2016-02-09 04:40 +0100

#1328737 — Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/8] staging: fsl-mc: static inline function to differentiate root dprc

FromGreg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2016-02-08 04:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/8] staging: fsl-mc: static inline function to differentiate root dprc
Message-ID<qZKQa-7IQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 01:25:47PM -0600, Lijun Pan wrote:
> Define a static inline function is_root_dprc(dev) to tell whether
> a device is root dprc or not via platform_bus_type.
> Remove fsl_mc_is_root_dprc() because is_root_dprc() is simpler
> and easier to understand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <Lijun.Pan@freescale.com>
> ---
> v2: use static inline function instead of macro
>     replace the fsl_mc_is_root_dprc with is_root_dprc


This series doesn't apply to my tree anymore, due to another big
patcheset for this subsystem being applied.  Can you please rebase it
against my staging-testing branch of staging.git and resend?

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1329862

FromLijun Pan <lijun.pan@nxp.com>
Date2016-02-09 04:40 +0100
Message-ID<r07jI-6AS-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1328737

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2016 9:34 PM
> To: Lijun Pan <Lijun.Pan@freescale.com>
> Cc: arnd@arndb.de; devel@driverdev.osuosl.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; bhamciu1@freescale.com; Lijun.Pan2000@gmail.com;
> bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com; german.rivera@freescale.com;
> agraf@suse.de; stuart.yoder@freescale.com; nir.erez@freescale.com;
> itai.katz@freescale.com; scottwood@freescale.com; leoli@freescale.com;
> R89243@freescale.com; dan.carpenter@oracle.com;
> richard.schmitt@freescale.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/8] staging: fsl-mc: static inline function to
> differentiate root dprc
> 
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 01:25:47PM -0600, Lijun Pan wrote:
> > Define a static inline function is_root_dprc(dev) to tell whether a
> > device is root dprc or not via platform_bus_type.
> > Remove fsl_mc_is_root_dprc() because is_root_dprc() is simpler and
> > easier to understand.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <Lijun.Pan@freescale.com>
> > ---
> > v2: use static inline function instead of macro
> >     replace the fsl_mc_is_root_dprc with is_root_dprc
> 
> 
> This series doesn't apply to my tree anymore, due to another big patcheset for
> this subsystem being applied.  Can you please rebase it against my staging-
> testing branch of staging.git and resend?
> 

Greg,

I have just rebased the patches and re-sended the v3.
Please check your emails.

Thanks
Lijun

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web