Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1279110 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-28 09:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-30 03:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to enable/disable tracing Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> - 2015-11-28 09:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to enable/disable tracing Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-11-28 17:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to enable/disable tracing libin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> - 2015-11-30 03:10 +0100
| From | Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 09:00 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to enable/disable tracing |
| Message-ID | <qzIAi-5ZF-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On arm64, kstop_machine which is hugely disruptive to a running
system is not needed to convert nops to ftrace calls or back,
because that modifed code is a single 32bit instructions which
is impossible to cross cache (or page) boundaries, and the used str
instruction is single-copy atomic.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18+
Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
index c851be7..9669b33 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c
@@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ int ftrace_make_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec,
return ftrace_modify_code(pc, old, new, true);
}
+void arch_ftrace_update_code(int command)
+{
+ ftrace_modify_all_code(command);
+}
+
int __init ftrace_dyn_arch_init(void)
{
return 0;
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-28 17:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to enable/disable tracing |
| Message-ID | <qzQ4O-2hi-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1279110 |
On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:50:09 +0800 Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> wrote: > On arm64, kstop_machine which is hugely disruptive to a running > system is not needed to convert nops to ftrace calls or back, > because that modifed code is a single 32bit instructions which > is impossible to cross cache (or page) boundaries, and the used str > instruction is single-copy atomic. Is this really true? I thought that arm (and then perhaps arm64) has some 2 byte instructions. If that's the case it is very well possible that a 4 byte instruction can cross cache lines. -- Steve > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18+ > Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> > --- > arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c | 5 +++++ > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | libin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-30 03:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to enable/disable tracing |
| Message-ID | <qAm4F-5Jv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1279160 |
on 2015/11/28 23:58, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 15:50:09 +0800 > Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> wrote: > >> On arm64, kstop_machine which is hugely disruptive to a running >> system is not needed to convert nops to ftrace calls or back, >> because that modifed code is a single 32bit instructions which >> is impossible to cross cache (or page) boundaries, and the used str >> instruction is single-copy atomic. > Is this really true? I thought that arm (and then perhaps arm64) has > some 2 byte instructions. If that's the case it is very well possible > that a 4 byte instruction can cross cache lines. When system in aarch32 state, it will use A32 or T32 instrucion set, and T32 (thumb) have 16-bit instructions. But arm64 that in aarch64 state only using A64 instruction set, which is a clean and fixed length instruction set that instuctions are always 32 bits wide. Right? Thanks, Li Bin > -- Steve > >> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.18+ >> Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/kernel/ftrace.c | 5 +++++ >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web