Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1275245 > unrolled thread

Re: [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail

Started byJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
First post2015-11-23 12:30 +0100
Last post2015-11-24 11:10 +0100
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2015-11-23 12:30 +0100
    Re: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2015-11-24 03:00 +0100
    Re: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2015-11-24 05:50 +0100
      Re: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2015-11-24 11:10 +0100

#1275245 — Re: [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail

FromJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date2015-11-23 12:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail
Message-ID<qxXtL-15o-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
  Hello,

On Mon 23-11-15 16:29:25, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> 
> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree revert-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e
> commit e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e ("direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof")

Do you have the file:

/lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/299.full

produced by the failed test? Thanks!

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1276011 — Re: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail

From"Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Date2015-11-24 03:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail
Message-ID<qyb3H-1sG-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1275245
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:

>   Hello,
>
> On Mon 23-11-15 16:29:25, kernel test robot wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>> 
>> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree
>> revert-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e
>> commit e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e ("direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof")
>
> Do you have the file:
>
> /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/299.full
>
> produced by the failed test? Thanks!

Sorry, we don't collect that data during regular regression test.  Is
that needed all the time?  We will change our test scripts to collect
that data.  But that need some time.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1276058 — Re: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail

From"Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Date2015-11-24 05:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail
Message-ID<qydIe-3iZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1275245

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:

>   Hello,
>
> On Mon 23-11-15 16:29:25, kernel test robot wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>> 
>> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree
>> revert-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e
>> commit e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e ("direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof")
>
> Do you have the file:
>
> /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/299.full
>
> produced by the failed test? Thanks!

I found we have this feature in our test scripts already, just need to
fix a bug in script, but that is just done yesterday!  Please check the
299.full attached.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1276260 — Re: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail

FromJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date2015-11-24 11:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail
Message-ID<qyiHV-6J0-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1276058
On Tue 24-11-15 12:45:54, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:
> 
> >   Hello,
> >
> > On Mon 23-11-15 16:29:25, kernel test robot wrote:
> >> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >> 
> >> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree
> >> revert-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e
> >> commit e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e ("direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof")
> >
> > Do you have the file:
> >
> > /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/299.full
> >
> > produced by the failed test? Thanks!
> 
> I found we have this feature in our test scripts already, just need to
> fix a bug in script, but that is just done yesterday!  Please check the
> 299.full attached.

Thanks for the file. The cause of failure is ENOMEM error aio-dio-verifier
got - so it is very likely unrelated to my patch:

fio: io_u.c:1315: __get_io_u: Assertion `io_u->flags & IO_U_F_FREE' failed.
fio: pid=607, got signal=6
fio: io_u error on file /fs/scratch/aio-dio-verifier: Cannot allocate memory
     read offset=8446353408, buflen=4096
fio: io_u error on file /fs/scratch/aio-dio-verifier: Cannot allocate memory
     read offset=71839776768, buflen=4096
aio-dio-verifier: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err=12 (file:io_u.c:1548, func=io_u
  error, error=Cannot allocate memory): pid=605: Tue Nov 24 11:18:39 2015
  cpu          : usr=0.00%, sys=0.10%, ctx=42, majf=0, minf=14
  IO depths    : 1=0.8%, 2=1.6%, 4=3.1%, 8=6.2%, 16=12.5%, 32=25.0%, >=64=50.8%
     submit    : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     complete  : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
     issued    : total=r=64/w=64/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
     errors    : total=0, first_error=0/<Success>
     latency   : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=128

If you have time, you can check why ENOMEM actually happens in your test
setup...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web