Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1275245 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-23 12:30 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-24 11:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2015-11-23 12:30 +0100
Re: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2015-11-24 03:00 +0100
Re: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> - 2015-11-24 05:50 +0100
Re: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2015-11-24 11:10 +0100
| From | Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-23 12:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail |
| Message-ID | <qxXtL-15o-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello,
On Mon 23-11-15 16:29:25, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>
> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree revert-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e
> commit e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e ("direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof")
Do you have the file:
/lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/299.full
produced by the failed test? Thanks!
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-24 03:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail |
| Message-ID | <qyb3H-1sG-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1275245 |
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon 23-11-15 16:29:25, kernel test robot wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree
>> revert-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e
>> commit e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e ("direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof")
>
> Do you have the file:
>
> /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/299.full
>
> produced by the failed test? Thanks!
Sorry, we don't collect that data during regular regression test. Is
that needed all the time? We will change our test scripts to collect
that data. But that need some time.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-24 05:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail |
| Message-ID | <qydIe-3iZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1275245 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon 23-11-15 16:29:25, kernel test robot wrote:
>> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>>
>> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree
>> revert-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e
>> commit e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e ("direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof")
>
> Do you have the file:
>
> /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/299.full
>
> produced by the failed test? Thanks!
I found we have this feature in our test scripts already, just need to
fix a bug in script, but that is just done yesterday! Please check the
299.full attached.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-24 11:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [LKP] [lkp] [direct] e594571852: xfstests.generic.299.fail |
| Message-ID | <qyiHV-6J0-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1276058 |
On Tue 24-11-15 12:45:54, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Mon 23-11-15 16:29:25, kernel test robot wrote:
> >> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >>
> >> git://internal_merge_and_test_tree
> >> revert-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e-e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e
> >> commit e594571852b03a5503ba48edd718462e99bf238e ("direct-io: Fix negative return from dio read beyond eof")
> >
> > Do you have the file:
> >
> > /lkp/benchmarks/xfstests/results//generic/299.full
> >
> > produced by the failed test? Thanks!
>
> I found we have this feature in our test scripts already, just need to
> fix a bug in script, but that is just done yesterday! Please check the
> 299.full attached.
Thanks for the file. The cause of failure is ENOMEM error aio-dio-verifier
got - so it is very likely unrelated to my patch:
fio: io_u.c:1315: __get_io_u: Assertion `io_u->flags & IO_U_F_FREE' failed.
fio: pid=607, got signal=6
fio: io_u error on file /fs/scratch/aio-dio-verifier: Cannot allocate memory
read offset=8446353408, buflen=4096
fio: io_u error on file /fs/scratch/aio-dio-verifier: Cannot allocate memory
read offset=71839776768, buflen=4096
aio-dio-verifier: (groupid=0, jobs=1): err=12 (file:io_u.c:1548, func=io_u
error, error=Cannot allocate memory): pid=605: Tue Nov 24 11:18:39 2015
cpu : usr=0.00%, sys=0.10%, ctx=42, majf=0, minf=14
IO depths : 1=0.8%, 2=1.6%, 4=3.1%, 8=6.2%, 16=12.5%, 32=25.0%, >=64=50.8%
submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0%
issued : total=r=64/w=64/d=0, short=r=0/w=0/d=0
errors : total=0, first_error=0/<Success>
latency : target=0, window=0, percentile=100.00%, depth=128
If you have time, you can check why ENOMEM actually happens in your test
setup...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web