Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1277104 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH RESEND 00/16] Support TI LMU devices

Started by"Kim, Milo" <milo.kim@ti.com>
First post2015-11-25 10:00 +0100
Last post2015-11-25 10:10 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH RESEND 00/16] Support TI LMU devices "Kim, Milo" <milo.kim@ti.com> - 2015-11-25 10:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH RESEND 00/16] Support TI LMU devices Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-11-25 10:10 +0100

#1277104 — Re: [PATCH RESEND 00/16] Support TI LMU devices

From"Kim, Milo" <milo.kim@ti.com>
Date2015-11-25 10:00 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND 00/16] Support TI LMU devices
Message-ID<qyE5I-3P7-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 11/3/2015 5:33 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Nov 2015, Kim, Milo wrote:
>
>> Hi Lee,
>>
>> On 11/2/2015 5:59 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>>>   drivers/video/backlight/Kconfig                    |  62 ++
>>>>>   drivers/video/backlight/Makefile                   |   7 +
>>>>>   drivers/video/backlight/lm3532_bl.c                | 183 +++++
>>>>>   drivers/video/backlight/lm3631_bl.c                | 129 ++++
>>>>>   drivers/video/backlight/lm3632_bl.c                | 125 ++++
>>>>>   drivers/video/backlight/lm3633_bl.c                | 210 ++++++
>>>>>   drivers/video/backlight/lm3695_bl.c                |  91 +++
>>>>>   drivers/video/backlight/lm3697_bl.c                | 187 +++++
>>>>>   drivers/video/backlight/ti-lmu-backlight.c         | 429 ++++++++++++
>>>>>   drivers/video/backlight/ti-lmu-backlight.h         | 152 +++++
>>> How different are all of these drivers?
>>>
>>> Can you create one driver that supports them all instead?
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for your suggestion.
>>
>> 'ti-lmu-backlight' is the common part of lmxxxx_bl drivers. And each
>> lmxxx_bl has its own operation functions by using ti_lmu_bl_ops.
>> I've tried to make consolidated driver but it contained too much
>> device specific code in one file. So I prefer simple drivers
>> structure - 'common part' and 'device specific operations'.
>> It would be appreciated if you could introduce better idea.
>
> I wish to avoid having to apply the patches to conduct my own analysis
> of the files, as I am severely restricted on time.  Can you tell me how
> much duplicated code there is between the files?  How many lines would
> be saved by supporting all of the lm* drivers in a single file?
>

Now, consolidated driver is ready. It improves not only lines of code 
but also code size. Patch v2 will be sent soon.

Lines of code
-------------
194 lines are saved in consolidated driver.

Patch v1: 1420 (8 files*)
Patch v2: 1226 (3 files**)

*	ti-lmu-backlight.c (429)
	ti-lmu-backlight.h (152)
	lm3532_bl.c (183)
	lm3631_bl.c (129)
	lm3632_bl.c (125)
	lm3633_bl.c (210)
	lm3695_bl.c (95)
	lm3697_bl.c (97)

**	ti-lmu-backlight-core.c (649)
	ti-lmu-backlight-data.c (287)
	ti-lmu-backlight.h (290)

Size
----
The text segment is decreased by removing duplicate instructions.

Patch v1
    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
   12202	    720	     40	  12962	   32a2	drivers/video/backlight/built-in.o

Patch v2
    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
    6883	    712	     41	   7636	   1dd4	drivers/video/backlight/built-in.o

Test environment
----------------
- Kernel version: 4.4.0-rc2 (linux-next)
- backlight/built-in.o includes backlight core and ti-lmu-backlight 
drivers. No other backlight drivers included.

Change details will be described in the patch-set.

Best regards,
Milo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1277114

FromLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Date2015-11-25 10:10 +0100
Message-ID<qyEfo-48i-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1277104
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, Kim, Milo wrote:

> On 11/3/2015 5:33 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >On Tue, 03 Nov 2015, Kim, Milo wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Lee,
> >>
> >>On 11/2/2015 5:59 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>>>  drivers/video/backlight/Kconfig                    |  62 ++
> >>>>>  drivers/video/backlight/Makefile                   |   7 +
> >>>>>  drivers/video/backlight/lm3532_bl.c                | 183 +++++
> >>>>>  drivers/video/backlight/lm3631_bl.c                | 129 ++++
> >>>>>  drivers/video/backlight/lm3632_bl.c                | 125 ++++
> >>>>>  drivers/video/backlight/lm3633_bl.c                | 210 ++++++
> >>>>>  drivers/video/backlight/lm3695_bl.c                |  91 +++
> >>>>>  drivers/video/backlight/lm3697_bl.c                | 187 +++++
> >>>>>  drivers/video/backlight/ti-lmu-backlight.c         | 429 ++++++++++++
> >>>>>  drivers/video/backlight/ti-lmu-backlight.h         | 152 +++++
> >>>How different are all of these drivers?
> >>>
> >>>Can you create one driver that supports them all instead?
> >>>
> >>
> >>Thanks for your suggestion.
> >>
> >>'ti-lmu-backlight' is the common part of lmxxxx_bl drivers. And each
> >>lmxxx_bl has its own operation functions by using ti_lmu_bl_ops.
> >>I've tried to make consolidated driver but it contained too much
> >>device specific code in one file. So I prefer simple drivers
> >>structure - 'common part' and 'device specific operations'.
> >>It would be appreciated if you could introduce better idea.
> >
> >I wish to avoid having to apply the patches to conduct my own analysis
> >of the files, as I am severely restricted on time.  Can you tell me how
> >much duplicated code there is between the files?  How many lines would
> >be saved by supporting all of the lm* drivers in a single file?
> >
> 
> Now, consolidated driver is ready. It improves not only lines of
> code but also code size. Patch v2 will be sent soon.
> 
> Lines of code
> -------------
> 194 lines are saved in consolidated driver.
> 
> Patch v1: 1420 (8 files*)
> Patch v2: 1226 (3 files**)
> 
> *	ti-lmu-backlight.c (429)
> 	ti-lmu-backlight.h (152)
> 	lm3532_bl.c (183)
> 	lm3631_bl.c (129)
> 	lm3632_bl.c (125)
> 	lm3633_bl.c (210)
> 	lm3695_bl.c (95)
> 	lm3697_bl.c (97)
> 
> **	ti-lmu-backlight-core.c (649)
> 	ti-lmu-backlight-data.c (287)
> 	ti-lmu-backlight.h (290)
> 
> Size
> ----
> The text segment is decreased by removing duplicate instructions.
> 
> Patch v1
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
>   12202	    720	     40	  12962	   32a2	drivers/video/backlight/built-in.o
> 
> Patch v2
>    text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
>    6883	    712	     41	   7636	   1dd4	drivers/video/backlight/built-in.o
> 
> Test environment
> ----------------
> - Kernel version: 4.4.0-rc2 (linux-next)
> - backlight/built-in.o includes backlight core and ti-lmu-backlight
> drivers. No other backlight drivers included.
> 
> Change details will be described in the patch-set.

Excellent news.  Thanks for carrying out this work.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web