Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1273381 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 1/2] ptrace: make wait_on_bit(JOBCTL_TRAPPING_BIT) in ptrace_attach() killable

Started byOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
First post2015-11-19 19:50 +0100
Last post2015-11-24 00:10 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 1/2] ptrace: make wait_on_bit(JOBCTL_TRAPPING_BIT) in  ptrace_attach() killable Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> - 2015-11-19 19:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] ptrace: make wait_on_bit(JOBCTL_TRAPPING_BIT) in  ptrace_attach() killable Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2015-11-24 00:10 +0100

#1273381 — [PATCH 1/2] ptrace: make wait_on_bit(JOBCTL_TRAPPING_BIT) in ptrace_attach() killable

FromOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date2015-11-19 19:50 +0100
Subject[PATCH 1/2] ptrace: make wait_on_bit(JOBCTL_TRAPPING_BIT) in ptrace_attach() killable
Message-ID<qwCrp-4G9-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
ptrace_attach() can hang waiting for STOPPED -> TRACED transition if the
tracee gets frozen in between, change wait_on_bit() to use TASK_KILLABLE.

This doesn't really solve the problem(s) and we probably need to fix the
freezer. In particular, note that this means that pm freezer will fail if
it races attach-to-stopped-task.

And otoh perhaps we can just remove JOBCTL_TRAPPING_BIT altogether, it is
not clear if we really need to hide this transition from debugger, WNOHANG
after PTRACE_ATTACH can fail anyway if it races with SIGCONT.

Reported-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/ptrace.c |   10 ++++++++--
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
index c8e0e05..80b3604 100644
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -364,8 +364,14 @@ unlock_creds:
 	mutex_unlock(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex);
 out:
 	if (!retval) {
-		wait_on_bit(&task->jobctl, JOBCTL_TRAPPING_BIT,
-			    TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+		/*
+		 * We do not bother to change retval or clear JOBCTL_TRAPPING
+		 * if wait_on_bit() was interrupted by SIGKILL. The tracer will
+		 * not return to user-mode, it will exit and clear this bit in
+		 * __ptrace_unlink() if it wasn't already cleared by the tracee;
+		 * and until then nobody can ptrace this task.
+		 */
+		wait_on_bit(&task->jobctl, JOBCTL_TRAPPING_BIT, TASK_KILLABLE);
 		proc_ptrace_connector(task, PTRACE_ATTACH);
 	}
 
-- 
1.5.5.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1275950

FromTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date2015-11-24 00:10 +0100
Message-ID<qy8pc-8rU-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1273381
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 07:47:32PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> ptrace_attach() can hang waiting for STOPPED -> TRACED transition if the
> tracee gets frozen in between, change wait_on_bit() to use TASK_KILLABLE.
> 
> This doesn't really solve the problem(s) and we probably need to fix the
> freezer. In particular, note that this means that pm freezer will fail if
> it races attach-to-stopped-task.
> 
> And otoh perhaps we can just remove JOBCTL_TRAPPING_BIT altogether, it is
> not clear if we really need to hide this transition from debugger, WNOHANG
> after PTRACE_ATTACH can fail anyway if it races with SIGCONT.
> 
> Reported-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web