Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1275096 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: rockchip: dmc: support rk3399 dmc clock driver

Started byMyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
First post2015-11-23 09:10 +0100
Last post2015-11-23 10:30 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: rockchip: dmc: support rk3399 dmc clock driver MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> - 2015-11-23 09:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: rockchip: dmc: support rk3399 dmc clock driver hl <hl@rock-chips.com> - 2015-11-23 10:30 +0100

#1275096 — Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: rockchip: dmc: support rk3399 dmc clock driver

FromMyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
Date2015-11-23 09:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] clk: rockchip: dmc: support rk3399 dmc clock driver
Message-ID<qxUme-7zM-25@gated-at.bofh.it>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--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1275158

Fromhl <hl@rock-chips.com>
Date2015-11-23 10:30 +0100
Message-ID<qxVBF-8jJ-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1275096
Hi MyungJoo,

On 23/11/15 16:09, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
>> +static unsigned long rk3399_dmcclk_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>> +					       unsigned long parent_rate)
>> +{
>> +	struct rk3399_dmcclk *dmc = to_rk3399_dmcclk(&hw);
>> +	u32 val;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Get parent rate since it changed in this clks set_rate op. The parent
>> +	 * rate passed into this function is cached before set_rate is called in
>> +	 * the common clk code, so we have to get it here.
>> +	 */
>> +	parent_rate = clk_get_rate(clk_get_parent(hw->clk));
>> +
>> +	val = readl(dmc->cru + CRU_CLKSEL6_CON);
>> +	val = (val >> CLK_DDRC_DIV_CON_SHIFT) & CLK_DDRC_DIV_CON_MASK;
>> +
>> +	return parent_rate / (val + 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * TODO: set ddr frequcney in dcf which run in ATF
>> + */
>> +static int rk3399_dmcclk_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>> +				  unsigned long parent_rate)
>> +{
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> Is it correct that you didn't fill this up because your
> Trustzone driver (SMC) is not ready yet?
     Yep, the SMC is not ready yet.
>
> Then, why don't you fill that function assuming that TrustZone is not activated
> and add SMC call functions with if or #if after its TrustZone driver is ready?
>
> Or does your SoC mandate the usage ot TrustZone, restricting the usage
> of CRU_CLKSEL6_CON write? (I don't see why SoC vendors will do this..)
>
>
> I'll be ready to merge the RK3399 devfreq driver if you
> fill this up (assuming that TZ is not enabled) or
> add TZ driver and SMC calls.
     Thank you for your reply,  it is good idea use if or #if to 
distinguish the TrustZone whether ready,
     i will handle it in next version. I may follow Heiko advice to do 
some modify in dmc clock and rk3399 devfreq driver,
     I will upload new version when it's ready.
>
> Cheers,
> MyungJoo
> ps. according to rk339_dmcclk_recalc_rate(), filling rk339_dmcclk_set_rate
> assuming that TZ is not enabled seems trivial.

-- 
Lin Huang


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web