Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1274858 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-22 13:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-22 13:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH V4 07/26] coresight: moving PM runtime operations to core framework Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2015-11-22 13:20 +0100
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-22 13:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 07/26] coresight: moving PM runtime operations to core framework |
| Message-ID | <qxBMB-3Cq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:44 PM, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> wrote: > Moving PM runtime operations in Coresight devices enable() and > disable() API to the framework core when a path is setup. That > way the runtime core doesn't have to be involved everytime a > path is enabled. It also avoids calling runtime PM operations > in IRQ context. > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Looks reasonable. The PM runtime part of coresight is not very aggressive anyways, and I think the most important thing it does is assure it does not consume any power (clocks etc) when it's not in use. Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web