Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1272996 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] test_hexdump: test all possible group sizes for overflow

Started byRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
First post2015-11-19 11:20 +0100
Last post2015-11-23 10:40 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] test_hexdump: test all possible group sizes for overflow Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> - 2015-11-19 11:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] test_hexdump: test all possible group sizes for  overflow Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-20 17:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] test_hexdump: test all possible group sizes for overflow Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> - 2015-11-23 10:40 +0100

#1272996 — Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] test_hexdump: test all possible group sizes for overflow

FromRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date2015-11-19 11:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 6/7] test_hexdump: test all possible group sizes for overflow
Message-ID<qwutQ-7Ys-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, Nov 11 2015, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Currently only one combination is tested for overflow, i.e. rowsize = 16,
> groupsize = 1, len = 1.  Do various test to go all possible branches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/test_hexdump.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/test_hexdump.c b/lib/test_hexdump.c
> index 9b95b67..fa2f4af 100644
> --- a/lib/test_hexdump.c
> +++ b/lib/test_hexdump.c
> @@ -126,12 +126,13 @@ static void __init test_hexdump_set(int rowsize, bool ascii)
>  	test_hexdump(len, rowsize, 1, ascii);
>  }
>  
> -static void __init test_hexdump_overflow(size_t buflen, bool ascii)
> +static void __init test_hexdump_overflow(size_t buflen, size_t len,
> +					 int rowsize, int groupsize,
> +					 bool ascii)
>  {
>  	char test[TEST_HEXDUMP_BUF_SIZE];
>  	char buf[TEST_HEXDUMP_BUF_SIZE];
> -	size_t len = 1;
> -	int rs = 16, gs = 1;
> +	int rs = rowsize, gs = groupsize;
>  	int ae, he, e, r;
>  	bool a;
>  
> @@ -170,6 +171,18 @@ static void __init test_hexdump_overflow(size_t buflen, bool ascii)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void __init test_hexdump_overflow_set(size_t buflen, bool ascii)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i = 0;
> +
> +	do {
> +		int gs = 1 << i;
> +		size_t len = get_random_int() % 16 + gs;
> +
> +		test_hexdump_overflow(buflen, rounddown(len, gs), 16, gs, ascii);
> +	} while (i++ < 3);
> +}


aren't you missing a

  test_hexdump_overflow(buflen, rounddown(len, gs), 32, gs, ascii);

here to also exercise the rowsize==32 code?


> +
>  static int __init test_hexdump_init(void)
>  {
>  	unsigned int i;
> @@ -186,10 +199,10 @@ static int __init test_hexdump_init(void)
>  		test_hexdump_set(rowsize, true);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i <= TEST_HEXDUMP_BUF_SIZE; i++)
> -		test_hexdump_overflow(i, false);
> +		test_hexdump_overflow_set(i, false);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i <= TEST_HEXDUMP_BUF_SIZE; i++)
> -		test_hexdump_overflow(i, true);
> +		test_hexdump_overflow_set(i, true);

It seems neater to do one loop:

for (i = 0; i <= TEST_HEXDUMP_BUF_SIZE; i++) {
  test_hexdump_overflow_set(i, false);
  test_hexdump_overflow_set(i, true);
}

Rasmus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1274259 — Re: [PATCH v1 6/7] test_hexdump: test all possible group sizes for overflow

FromAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date2015-11-20 17:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v1 6/7] test_hexdump: test all possible group sizes for overflow
Message-ID<qwX2P-1hA-51@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1272996
On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:14 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11 2015, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.c
> om> wrote:
> 
> > Currently only one combination is tested for overflow, i.e. rowsize
> > = 16,
> > groupsize = 1, len = 1.  Do various test to go all possible
> > branches.

[]

> > +	do {
> > +		int gs = 1 << i;
> > +		size_t len = get_random_int() % 16 + gs;
> > +
> > +		test_hexdump_overflow(buflen, rounddown(len, gs),
> > 16, gs, ascii);
> > +	} while (i++ < 3);
> > +}
> 
> 
> aren't you missing a
> 
>   test_hexdump_overflow(buflen, rounddown(len, gs), 32, gs, ascii);
> 
> here to also exercise the rowsize==32 code?

I could add that as well, though it seems minor since the idea is to go
for all branches, which 16 covers anyway.

>  static int __init test_hexdump_init(void)
> >  {
> >  	unsigned int i;
> > @@ -186,10 +199,10 @@ static int __init test_hexdump_init(void)
> >  		test_hexdump_set(rowsize, true);
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i <= TEST_HEXDUMP_BUF_SIZE; i++)
> > -		test_hexdump_overflow(i, false);
> > +		test_hexdump_overflow_set(i, false);
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i <= TEST_HEXDUMP_BUF_SIZE; i++)
> > -		test_hexdump_overflow(i, true);
> > +		test_hexdump_overflow_set(i, true);
> 
> It seems neater to do one loop:
> 
> for (i = 0; i <= TEST_HEXDUMP_BUF_SIZE; i++) {
>   test_hexdump_overflow_set(i, false);
>   test_hexdump_overflow_set(i, true);
> }

I would like to keep them separately, though I'm also okay to do it in
one loop.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1275166

FromRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date2015-11-23 10:40 +0100
Message-ID<qxVLk-8n9-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1274259
On Fri, Nov 20 2015, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2015-11-19 at 11:14 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> 
>> aren't you missing a
>> 
>>   test_hexdump_overflow(buflen, rounddown(len, gs), 32, gs, ascii);
>> 
>> here to also exercise the rowsize==32 code?
>
> I could add that as well, though it seems minor since the idea is to go
> for all branches, which 16 covers anyway.

Well, I didn't look into the implementation when I wrote that; it just
seemed like an obvious thing to check all allowed combinations of
rowsize, groupsize and ascii.

>>  static int __init test_hexdump_init(void)
>> >  {
>> >  	unsigned int i;
>> > @@ -186,10 +199,10 @@ static int __init test_hexdump_init(void)
>> >  		test_hexdump_set(rowsize, true);
>> >  
>> >  	for (i = 0; i <= TEST_HEXDUMP_BUF_SIZE; i++)
>> > -		test_hexdump_overflow(i, false);
>> > +		test_hexdump_overflow_set(i, false);
>> >  
>> >  	for (i = 0; i <= TEST_HEXDUMP_BUF_SIZE; i++)
>> > -		test_hexdump_overflow(i, true);
>> > +		test_hexdump_overflow_set(i, true);
>> 
>> It seems neater to do one loop:
>> 
>> for (i = 0; i <= TEST_HEXDUMP_BUF_SIZE; i++) {
>>   test_hexdump_overflow_set(i, false);
>>   test_hexdump_overflow_set(i, true);
>> }
>
> I would like to keep them separately, though I'm also okay to do it in
> one loop.

Your code, your call.

Rasmus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web