Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1272841 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: EXYNOS: Consolidate ARCH_EXYNOS7 symbol into ARCH_EXYNOS

Started byTomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
First post2015-11-19 05:30 +0100
Last post2015-11-19 05:40 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: EXYNOS: Consolidate ARCH_EXYNOS7 symbol into ARCH_EXYNOS Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 05:30 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: EXYNOS: Consolidate ARCH_EXYNOS7 symbol into  ARCH_EXYNOS Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> - 2015-11-19 05:40 +0100

#1272841 — Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: EXYNOS: Consolidate ARCH_EXYNOS7 symbol into ARCH_EXYNOS

FromTomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-19 05:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: EXYNOS: Consolidate ARCH_EXYNOS7 symbol into ARCH_EXYNOS
Message-ID<qwp18-4sf-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Krzysztof,

2015-11-16 10:36 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>:
> The ARMv8 Exynos family SoCs in Linux kernel are currently:
>  - Exynos5433 (controlled by ARCH_EXYNOS),
>  - Exynos7 (controlled by ARCH_EXYNOS7).
>
> It duplicates Kconfig symbols unnecessarily, so consolidate them into
> one ARCH_EXYNOS. Future SoCs could fall also under the ARCH_EXYNOS
> symbol.
>
> The commit should not bring any visible functional change.

I think this basically matches the general recommendation for ARM64,
so excluding the single nitpick inline and assuming that, after this
patch, grep ARCH_EXYNOS7 gives no results:

Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>

>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms        | 11 ++---------
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/Makefile |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig        |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> index 4043c35962cc..afa19baca94e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> @@ -13,21 +13,14 @@ config ARCH_BERLIN
>           This enables support for Marvell Berlin SoC Family
>
>  config ARCH_EXYNOS
> -       bool
> -       help
> -         This enables support for Samsung Exynos SoC family
> -
> -config ARCH_EXYNOS7
> -       bool "ARMv8 based Samsung Exynos7"
> -       select ARCH_EXYNOS
> +       bool "ARMv8 based Samsung Exynos SoC family"
>         select COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG
>         select HAVE_S3C2410_WATCHDOG if WATCHDOG
>         select HAVE_S3C_RTC if RTC_CLASS
>         select PINCTRL
>         select PINCTRL_EXYNOS
> -
>         help
> -         This enables support for Samsung Exynos7 SoC family
> +         This enables support for Samsung Exynos ARMv8 SoC family

nit: Sounds a little bit strange. Maybe "This enables support for
ARMv8 based Samsung Exynos SoC family"?

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1272845 — Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: EXYNOS: Consolidate ARCH_EXYNOS7 symbol into ARCH_EXYNOS

FromKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Date2015-11-19 05:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: EXYNOS: Consolidate ARCH_EXYNOS7 symbol into ARCH_EXYNOS
Message-ID<qwpaO-4vn-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1272841
On 19.11.2015 13:23, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> 2015-11-16 10:36 GMT+09:00 Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>:
>> The ARMv8 Exynos family SoCs in Linux kernel are currently:
>>  - Exynos5433 (controlled by ARCH_EXYNOS),
>>  - Exynos7 (controlled by ARCH_EXYNOS7).
>>
>> It duplicates Kconfig symbols unnecessarily, so consolidate them into
>> one ARCH_EXYNOS. Future SoCs could fall also under the ARCH_EXYNOS
>> symbol.
>>
>> The commit should not bring any visible functional change.
> 
> I think this basically matches the general recommendation for ARM64,
> so excluding the single nitpick inline and assuming that, after this
> patch, grep ARCH_EXYNOS7 gives no results:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms        | 11 ++---------
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/Makefile |  2 +-
>>  arch/arm64/configs/defconfig        |  2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>> index 4043c35962cc..afa19baca94e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>> @@ -13,21 +13,14 @@ config ARCH_BERLIN
>>           This enables support for Marvell Berlin SoC Family
>>
>>  config ARCH_EXYNOS
>> -       bool
>> -       help
>> -         This enables support for Samsung Exynos SoC family
>> -
>> -config ARCH_EXYNOS7
>> -       bool "ARMv8 based Samsung Exynos7"
>> -       select ARCH_EXYNOS
>> +       bool "ARMv8 based Samsung Exynos SoC family"
>>         select COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG
>>         select HAVE_S3C2410_WATCHDOG if WATCHDOG
>>         select HAVE_S3C_RTC if RTC_CLASS
>>         select PINCTRL
>>         select PINCTRL_EXYNOS
>> -
>>         help
>> -         This enables support for Samsung Exynos7 SoC family
>> +         This enables support for Samsung Exynos ARMv8 SoC family
> 
> nit: Sounds a little bit strange. Maybe "This enables support for
> ARMv8 based Samsung Exynos SoC family"?

Sure, sounds better.

Thanks for feedback!

BR,
Krzysztof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web