Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1273711 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/4] loop: Enable correct physical blocksize

Started byMing Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
First post2015-11-20 04:20 +0100
Last post2015-11-20 04:20 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/4] loop: Enable correct physical blocksize Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 04:20 +0100

#1273711 — Re: [PATCH 1/4] loop: Enable correct physical blocksize

FromMing Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-20 04:20 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] loop: Enable correct physical blocksize
Message-ID<qwKoV-1E5-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> wrote:
> When running on files the physical blocksize is actually 4k,
> so we should be announcing it as such. This is enabled with
> a new LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE flag value to the existing
> loop_set_status ioctl.

LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE is defined in patch 3/4, and you use
it too early in patch 1/4.

>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/block/loop.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
> index 423f4ca..e790487 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/loop.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
> @@ -233,6 +233,8 @@ figure_loop_size(struct loop_device *lo, loff_t offset, loff_t sizelimit)
>                 lo->lo_offset = offset;
>         if (lo->lo_sizelimit != sizelimit)
>                 lo->lo_sizelimit = sizelimit;
> +       if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE)
> +               blk_queue_physical_block_size(lo->lo_queue, lo->lo_blocksize);
>         set_capacity(lo->lo_disk, x);
>         bd_set_size(bdev, (loff_t)get_capacity(bdev->bd_disk) << 9);
>         /* let user-space know about the new size */
> @@ -1092,6 +1094,7 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
>         int err;
>         struct loop_func_table *xfer;
>         kuid_t uid = current_uid();
> +       int lo_flags = lo->lo_flags;
>
>         if (lo->lo_encrypt_key_size &&
>             !uid_eq(lo->lo_key_owner, uid) &&
> @@ -1121,8 +1124,12 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
>         if (err)
>                 return err;
>
> +       if (info->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE)
> +               lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE;
> +
>         if (lo->lo_offset != info->lo_offset ||
> -           lo->lo_sizelimit != info->lo_sizelimit)
> +           lo->lo_sizelimit != info->lo_sizelimit ||
> +           lo->lo_flags != lo_flags)
>                 if (figure_loop_size(lo, info->lo_offset, info->lo_sizelimit))
>                         return -EFBIG;
>
> --
> 1.8.5.6
>



-- 
Ming Lei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web