Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1273542 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Prakash, Prashanth" <pprakash@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-19 23:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-26 12:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states "Prakash, Prashanth" <pprakash@codeaurora.org> - 2015-11-19 23:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> - 2015-11-26 12:10 +0100
| From | "Prakash, Prashanth" <pprakash@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-19 23:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states |
| Message-ID | <qwFyW-6U7-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Sudeep, On 10/27/2015 8:09 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Hi Prashanth, > > On 27/10/15 00:21, Prakash, Prashanth wrote: >> Hi Sudeep, >> >> While testing with these patches everything looked fine except that we >> are flattening all the LPI >> states even if it is disabled. I added a simple check to fix it. Please >> let me know if you have any >> feedback on the same. >> > > Looks good to me and thanks for the nice catch. I completely missed to > handle that case. Is it OK if I fold this patch into the next version ? > > I have worked on Ashwin's comments, but was waiting to get some feedback > from Rafael before I post newer version. > Did you had an opportunity to update the LPI patch set? Please let me know if you need any help in test/verification of the new patch set. -- Thanks, Prashanth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-26 12:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qz2B4-4lj-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1273542 |
Hi Prashanth, On 19/11/15 22:03, Prakash, Prashanth wrote: > Hi Sudeep, > > On 10/27/2015 8:09 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> Hi Prashanth, >> >> On 27/10/15 00:21, Prakash, Prashanth wrote: >>> Hi Sudeep, >>> >>> While testing with these patches everything looked fine except that we >>> are flattening all the LPI >>> states even if it is disabled. I added a simple check to fix it. Please >>> let me know if you have any >>> feedback on the same. >>> >> >> Looks good to me and thanks for the nice catch. I completely missed to >> handle that case. Is it OK if I fold this patch into the next version ? >> >> I have worked on Ashwin's comments, but was waiting to get some feedback >> from Rafael before I post newer version. >> > Did you had an opportunity to update the LPI patch set? Please let me know > if you need any help in test/verification of the new patch set. > Sorry for the late response, was off for 3 weeks. I will post the new version early next week after some testing. -- Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web