Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1269266 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-13 23:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-16 15:30 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 on this page of 24 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2015-11-13 23:00 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-14 00:00 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2015-11-14 08:50 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-14 13:40 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2015-11-14 19:00 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-14 20:00 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2015-11-14 22:20 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-15 01:20 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2015-11-16 08:50 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-16 12:00 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2015-11-16 13:40 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> - 2015-11-16 15:20 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> - 2015-11-16 15:50 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-16 18:40 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> - 2015-11-16 15:30 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2015-11-22 08:00 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-11-23 09:20 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2015-11-23 11:20 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> - 2015-11-23 11:30 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2015-11-23 12:40 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> - 2015-11-23 13:10 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-11-23 15:40 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> - 2015-11-23 16:10 +0100
Re: multi-codec support for arizona-ldo1 was Re: System with multiple arizona (wm5102) codecs Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> - 2015-11-16 15:30 +0100
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-23 13:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qxY6u-1yt-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1275252 |
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:30:41AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:25:22AM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 11:11 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > That's what I'm saying. It is good to know who is the person of > > > authority, as you can't tell from the From: address. > > > It's unreasonable to expect that one member of the Cirrus software team > > has the time to answer every inquiry about our drivers and never goes on > > vacation, or that there's only one person who is an authority about the > > drivers. There's a mailing list for a reason. > > It's perfectly OK to list multiple people - look at how other companies > handle this, there's usually two or three people listed. I don't really object to sticking a few people in here if the general feeling is that would be better, but personally I didn't see any problem with the current setup. Shall I do a patch to add a few of us in here? Thanks, Charles -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-23 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qy0rD-30z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1275269 |
On Mon, 23 Nov 2015, Charles Keepax wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:30:41AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:25:22AM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > > > On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 11:11 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > > That's what I'm saying. It is good to know who is the person of > > > > authority, as you can't tell from the From: address. > > > > > It's unreasonable to expect that one member of the Cirrus software team > > > has the time to answer every inquiry about our drivers and never goes on > > > vacation, or that there's only one person who is an authority about the > > > drivers. There's a mailing list for a reason. > > > > It's perfectly OK to list multiple people - look at how other companies > > handle this, there's usually two or three people listed. > > I don't really object to sticking a few people in here if the > general feeling is that would be better, but personally I didn't > see any problem with the current setup. Me either. > Shall I do a patch to add a few of us in here? Up to you. Happy either way. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-23 16:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qy0UH-3v4-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1275269 |
On Mon 2015-11-23 11:46:37, Charles Keepax wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:30:41AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 10:25:22AM +0000, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: > > > On Mon, 2015-11-23 at 11:11 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > > That's what I'm saying. It is good to know who is the person of > > > > authority, as you can't tell from the From: address. > > > > > It's unreasonable to expect that one member of the Cirrus software team > > > has the time to answer every inquiry about our drivers and never goes on > > > vacation, or that there's only one person who is an authority about the > > > drivers. There's a mailing list for a reason. > > > > It's perfectly OK to list multiple people - look at how other companies > > handle this, there's usually two or three people listed. > > I don't really object to sticking a few people in here if the > general feeling is that would be better, but personally I didn't > see any problem with the current setup. > > Shall I do a patch to add a few of us in here? Yes, please. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-16 15:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qvsX7-8rn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1269513 |
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 06:59:16PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > If you're asking about the regulator API or embedded ALSA both of those
> > are me but there are other things in here - the driver you're working
> > with and the MFD core at least. At the minute I'm not convinced that
> > the problem here isn't just that the MFD and/or MFD core hasn't set up
> > the mappings to the child devices properly.
>
> Ok, good. I don't understand how the things are expected to fit
> together. See above. I believe SND_SOC_ macros should have another
> argument "device", or maybe regulator names should have "device" name
> embedded in them.
Effectively the device is passed it is just implicit. If you look
where the regulator is actually registered in soc-dapm.c
case snd_soc_dapm_regulator_supply:
w->regulator = devm_regulator_get(dapm->dev, w->name);
if (IS_ERR(w->regulator)) {
You see we are requesting the regulator with the dapm device,
which will correspond to the CODEC.
Thanks,
Charles
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web