Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1268668 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] IB/sa: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC

Started bySaurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@gmail.com>
First post2015-11-13 08:50 +0100
Last post2015-11-13 13:40 +0100
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] IB/sa: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 08:50 +0100
    RE: [PATCH] IB/sa: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC "Wan, Kaike" <kaike.wan@intel.com> - 2015-11-13 11:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] IB/sa: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@gmail.com> - 2015-11-13 13:40 +0100

#1268668 — Re: [PATCH] IB/sa: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC

FromSaurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-13 08:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] IB/sa: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC
Message-ID<quhho-3uW-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Wed, 28 Oct 2015  at 04:30:10 +0000, Weiny, Ira wrote:
> Until we can remove the spinlock the current proposed patch should be applied 
> in the interim.  Sorry for the noise before.

> Reviewed-By: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>

Hi,

is this patch expected to be applied ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1268848

From"Wan, Kaike" <kaike.wan@intel.com>
Date2015-11-13 11:50 +0100
Message-ID<quk5A-5gS-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1268668
I don't think so. 

The following patch has rendered this patch unnecessary:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7526811/

Kaike

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-rdma-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-rdma-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Saurabh Sengar
> Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 2:42 AM
> To: Weiny, Ira; Wan, Kaike
> Cc: Hefty, Sean; hal.rosenstock@gmail.com; dledford@redhat.com; linux-
> rdma@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/sa: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC
> 
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015  at 04:30:10 +0000, Weiny, Ira wrote:
> > Until we can remove the spinlock the current proposed patch should be
> > applied in the interim.  Sorry for the noise before.
> 
> > Reviewed-By: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> is this patch expected to be applied ?
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the
> body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1268916

FromSaurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-13 13:40 +0100
Message-ID<qulO3-6pf-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1268848
On Fri, 13 Nov 2015  at 10:47:52 +0000, Wan, Kaike wrote:
> I don't think so.
> The following patch has rendered this patch unnecessary:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7526811/
> Kaike

OK, could you please use "Reported-by" tag of my name in your patch

Regards,
Saurabh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web