Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1269558 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-15 02:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-15 15:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/164] 3.2.70-rc1 review Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> - 2015-11-15 02:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/164] 3.2.70-rc1 review Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-11-15 15:10 +0100
| From | Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-15 02:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/164] 3.2.70-rc1 review |
| Message-ID | <quU93-39Z-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 21:24 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 08/02/2015 02:49 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-08-01 at 19:23 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 08/01/2015 05:02 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.70 release.
> > > > There are 164 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Wed Aug 05 23:00:00 UTC 2015.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Build results:
> > > > > > > total: 96 pass: 96 fail: 0
> > > Qemu test results:
> > > > > > > total: 22 pass: 22 fail: 0
> > >
> > > Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
> >
> > Thanks. I was checking there as I went along, which is why I added
> > patches 158-160. (It looks like you turned on some new config options
> > for those architectures recently, as the bugs those fix don't seem to
> > be triggered by earlier patches.)
> >
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> I added several 'allnoconfig' and 'allmodconfig' builds. At the same time,
> I changed the approach on how known failures are handled; those are now added
> to an exception list which won't be built in the first place.
>
> The current exception list for builds in 3.2 is:
>
> > alpha:allnoconfig
> > arm:allnoconfig
> > arm:allmodconfig
> > avr32:allnoconfig
> m68k:allnoconfig
> > microblaze:allnoconfig
> > mips:allmodconfig
> openrisc:allnoconfig
> > parisc:allnoconfig
> > sparc32:allmodconfig
> xtensa:defconfig
> > xtensa:allmodconfig
> > xtensa:allnoconfig
I would be interested to get the arm and mips allmodconfig builds
working if it's not too hard.
> and for qemu tests:
>
> powerpc:qemu_virtex440_defconfig
I don't even know what this is.
> arm:qemu_arm_vexpress_defconfig:vexpress-a15
> arm:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-a9
> arm:multi_v7_defconfig:vexpress-a15
I don't think 3.2 has any support either for ARM multiplatform, or
vexpress-a15 (arch/arm/mach-vexpress/Kconfig only mentions A9).
> There may be more as I am adding more builds.
>
> I didn't expect you to fix any of those. If you are, let me know,
> and I'll drop the build/qemu exceptions.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
- Albert Einstein
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-15 15:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qv6ae-2pZ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1269558 |
On 11/14/2015 05:12 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 21:24 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On 08/02/2015 02:49 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> On Sat, 2015-08-01 at 19:23 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> On 08/01/2015 05:02 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: >>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.70 release. >>>>> There are 164 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses >>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>>> let me know. >>>>> >>>>> Responses should be made by Wed Aug 05 23:00:00 UTC 2015. >>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Build results: >>>> > > > > total: 96 pass: 96 fail: 0 >>>> Qemu test results: >>>> > > > > total: 22 pass: 22 fail: 0 >>>> >>>> Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. >>> >>> Thanks. I was checking there as I went along, which is why I added >>> patches 158-160. (It looks like you turned on some new config options >>> for those architectures recently, as the bugs those fix don't seem to >>> be triggered by earlier patches.) >>> >> >> Hi Ben, >> >> I added several 'allnoconfig' and 'allmodconfig' builds. At the same time, >> I changed the approach on how known failures are handled; those are now added >> to an exception list which won't be built in the first place. >> >> The current exception list for builds in 3.2 is: >> >> > alpha:allnoconfig >> > arm:allnoconfig >> > arm:allmodconfig >> > avr32:allnoconfig >> m68k:allnoconfig >> > microblaze:allnoconfig >> > mips:allmodconfig >> openrisc:allnoconfig >> > parisc:allnoconfig >> > sparc32:allmodconfig >> xtensa:defconfig >> > xtensa:allmodconfig >> > xtensa:allnoconfig > > I would be interested to get the arm and mips allmodconfig builds > working if it's not too hard. > I had a look, but I think it is just too hard. Too many changes between 3.2 and 3.10 (which is the first building kernel for arm). Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web