Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1268035 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-12 16:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-16 11:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2015-11-12 16:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2015-11-12 17:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2015-11-12 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2015-11-12 18:00 +0100
[PATCH v2] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> - 2015-11-12 17:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> - 2015-11-16 11:10 +0100
| From | "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 16:40 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats |
| Message-ID | <qu28G-2eq-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Drivers like vxlan use the recently introduced
udp_tunnel_xmit_skb/udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb APIs. udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb
makes use of ip6tunnel_xmit, and ip6tunnel_xmit, after sending the
packet, updates the struct stats using the usual
u64_stats_update_begin/end calls on this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats).
udp_tunnel_xmit_skb makes use of iptunnel_xmit, which doesn't touch
tstats, so drivers like vxlan, immediately after, call
iptunnel_xmit_stats, which does the same thing - calls
u64_stats_update_begin/end on this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats).
While vxlan is probably fine (I don't know?), calling a similar function
from, say, an unbound workqueue, on a fully preemptable kernel causes
real issues:
[ 188.434537] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: kworker/u8:0/6
[ 188.435579] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
[ 188.435583] CPU: 0 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Not tainted 4.2.6 #2
[ 188.435607] Call Trace:
[ 188.435611] [<ffffffff8234e936>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[ 188.435615] [<ffffffff81915f3d>] check_preemption_disabled+0x19d/0x1c0
[ 188.435619] [<ffffffff81915f77>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
The solution would be to protect the whole
this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats)/u64_stats_update_begin/end blocks with
disabling preemption and then reenabling it.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
---
include/net/ip6_tunnel.h | 5 ++++-
include/net/ip_tunnels.h | 6 ++++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/ip6_tunnel.h b/include/net/ip6_tunnel.h
index fa915fa..67dc00d 100644
--- a/include/net/ip6_tunnel.h
+++ b/include/net/ip6_tunnel.h
@@ -90,11 +90,14 @@ static inline void ip6tunnel_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
err = ip6_local_out_sk(sk, skb);
if (net_xmit_eval(err) == 0) {
- struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats = this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats);
+ struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats;
+ preempt_disable();
+ tstats = this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats);
u64_stats_update_begin(&tstats->syncp);
tstats->tx_bytes += pkt_len;
tstats->tx_packets++;
u64_stats_update_end(&tstats->syncp);
+ preempt_enable();
} else {
stats->tx_errors++;
stats->tx_aborted_errors++;
diff --git a/include/net/ip_tunnels.h b/include/net/ip_tunnels.h
index f6dafec..6544955 100644
--- a/include/net/ip_tunnels.h
+++ b/include/net/ip_tunnels.h
@@ -287,12 +287,14 @@ static inline void iptunnel_xmit_stats(int err,
struct pcpu_sw_netstats __percpu *stats)
{
if (err > 0) {
- struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats = this_cpu_ptr(stats);
-
+ struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats;
+ preempt_disable();
+ tstats = this_cpu_ptr(stats);
u64_stats_update_begin(&tstats->syncp);
tstats->tx_bytes += err;
tstats->tx_packets++;
u64_stats_update_end(&tstats->syncp);
+ preempt_enable();
} else if (err < 0) {
err_stats->tx_errors++;
err_stats->tx_aborted_errors++;
--
2.6.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 17:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qu2V3-2MB-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1268035 |
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015, at 16:30, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> if (err > 0) {
> - struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats = this_cpu_ptr(stats);
> -
> + struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats;
> + preempt_disable();
> + tstats = this_cpu_ptr(stats);
The canonical way is get_cpu_ptr(stats) / put_cpu_ptr.
Bye,
Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 17:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qu34K-2QO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1268074 |
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> wrote: > The canonical way is get_cpu_ptr(stats) / put_cpu_ptr. Thanks for the pointer. Fixed in v2. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 18:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qu3o5-2Yr-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1268093 |
By the way, in case anybody is interested, I've done a little bit of historical digging work. The functions in question date back to aa0010f8 from 2012. Before that commit, statistics structures would be incremented after each tunnel's driver itself dereferenced the per-cpu variable. When this got factored out into iptunnel_xmit_stats, the author of aa0010f8 simply took the code from the tunnel drivers, which included the use of "this_cpu_ptr" instead of "get_cpu_ptr", because presumably each driver was able to ensure preemption was disabled in its codepath. With the generalization of this functionality into the globally useful iptunnel_xmit_stats, we'll need to be using "get_cpu_ptr" instead. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-12 17:40 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v2] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats |
| Message-ID | <qu34K-2QO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1268035 |
Drivers like vxlan use the recently introduced
udp_tunnel_xmit_skb/udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb APIs. udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb
makes use of ip6tunnel_xmit, and ip6tunnel_xmit, after sending the
packet, updates the struct stats using the usual
u64_stats_update_begin/end calls on this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats).
udp_tunnel_xmit_skb makes use of iptunnel_xmit, which doesn't touch
tstats, so drivers like vxlan, immediately after, call
iptunnel_xmit_stats, which does the same thing - calls
u64_stats_update_begin/end on this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats).
While vxlan is probably fine (I don't know?), calling a similar function
from, say, an unbound workqueue, on a fully preemptable kernel causes
real issues:
[ 188.434537] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: kworker/u8:0/6
[ 188.435579] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
[ 188.435583] CPU: 0 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Not tainted 4.2.6 #2
[ 188.435607] Call Trace:
[ 188.435611] [<ffffffff8234e936>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[ 188.435615] [<ffffffff81915f3d>] check_preemption_disabled+0x19d/0x1c0
[ 188.435619] [<ffffffff81915f77>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
The solution would be to protect the whole
this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats)/u64_stats_update_begin/end blocks with
disabling preemption and then reenabling it.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
---
include/net/ip6_tunnel.h | 3 ++-
include/net/ip_tunnels.h | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/ip6_tunnel.h b/include/net/ip6_tunnel.h
index fa915fa..d49a8f8 100644
--- a/include/net/ip6_tunnel.h
+++ b/include/net/ip6_tunnel.h
@@ -90,11 +90,12 @@ static inline void ip6tunnel_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
err = ip6_local_out_sk(sk, skb);
if (net_xmit_eval(err) == 0) {
- struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats = this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats);
+ struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats = get_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats);
u64_stats_update_begin(&tstats->syncp);
tstats->tx_bytes += pkt_len;
tstats->tx_packets++;
u64_stats_update_end(&tstats->syncp);
+ put_cpu_ptr(tstats);
} else {
stats->tx_errors++;
stats->tx_aborted_errors++;
diff --git a/include/net/ip_tunnels.h b/include/net/ip_tunnels.h
index f6dafec..62a750a 100644
--- a/include/net/ip_tunnels.h
+++ b/include/net/ip_tunnels.h
@@ -287,12 +287,13 @@ static inline void iptunnel_xmit_stats(int err,
struct pcpu_sw_netstats __percpu *stats)
{
if (err > 0) {
- struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats = this_cpu_ptr(stats);
+ struct pcpu_sw_netstats *tstats = get_cpu_ptr(stats);
u64_stats_update_begin(&tstats->syncp);
tstats->tx_bytes += err;
tstats->tx_packets++;
u64_stats_update_end(&tstats->syncp);
+ put_cpu_ptr(tstats);
} else if (err < 0) {
err_stats->tx_errors++;
err_stats->tx_aborted_errors++;
--
2.6.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-16 11:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] ip_tunnel: disable preemption when updating per-cpu tstats |
| Message-ID | <qvoTw-5Zc-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1268092 |
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015, at 17:35, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Drivers like vxlan use the recently introduced > udp_tunnel_xmit_skb/udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb APIs. udp_tunnel6_xmit_skb > makes use of ip6tunnel_xmit, and ip6tunnel_xmit, after sending the > packet, updates the struct stats using the usual > u64_stats_update_begin/end calls on this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats). > udp_tunnel_xmit_skb makes use of iptunnel_xmit, which doesn't touch > tstats, so drivers like vxlan, immediately after, call > iptunnel_xmit_stats, which does the same thing - calls > u64_stats_update_begin/end on this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats). > > While vxlan is probably fine (I don't know?), calling a similar function > from, say, an unbound workqueue, on a fully preemptable kernel causes > real issues: > > [ 188.434537] BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] > code: kworker/u8:0/6 > [ 188.435579] caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 > [ 188.435583] CPU: 0 PID: 6 Comm: kworker/u8:0 Not tainted 4.2.6 #2 > [ 188.435607] Call Trace: > [ 188.435611] [<ffffffff8234e936>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b > [ 188.435615] [<ffffffff81915f3d>] > check_preemption_disabled+0x19d/0x1c0 > [ 188.435619] [<ffffffff81915f77>] debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 > > The solution would be to protect the whole > this_cpu_ptr(dev->tstats)/u64_stats_update_begin/end blocks with > disabling preemption and then reenabling it. > > Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org> Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web