Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1266667 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update

Started byThierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
First post2015-11-10 18:40 +0100
Last post2015-11-10 19:30 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 18:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2015-11-10 19:30 +0100

#1266667 — Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update

FromThierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-10 18:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 00/12] pwm: add support for atomic update
Message-ID<qtl3J-83A-19@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:12:12PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
> 
> Am Montag, 21. September 2015, 11:33:17 schrieb Boris Brezillon:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This series adds support for atomic PWM update, or IOW, the capability
> > to update all the parameters of a PWM device (enabled/disabled, period,
> > duty and polarity) in one go.
> 
> is anything more blocking this series? It's now sitting on the lists for 
> nearly a month and everybody seems happy with it, so it would be really nice 
> to have in mainline :-) .
> 
> Especially as this also makes it possible for Rockchip Chromebooks to actually 
> control the logic-regulator that is implemented as pwm-regulator there.

Last time I tried to put this into linux-next I got immediately
bombarded by a number of build failures, so I backed things out. The
current plan is to give this another try after v4.4-rc1.

Thierry

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1266702

FromBoris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Date2015-11-10 19:30 +0100
Message-ID<qtlQ5-9M-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1266667
Hi Thierry,

On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:34:16 +0100
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:12:12PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Hi Thierry,
> > 
> > Am Montag, 21. September 2015, 11:33:17 schrieb Boris Brezillon:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > This series adds support for atomic PWM update, or IOW, the capability
> > > to update all the parameters of a PWM device (enabled/disabled, period,
> > > duty and polarity) in one go.
> > 
> > is anything more blocking this series? It's now sitting on the lists for 
> > nearly a month and everybody seems happy with it, so it would be really nice 
> > to have in mainline :-) .
> > 
> > Especially as this also makes it possible for Rockchip Chromebooks to actually 
> > control the logic-regulator that is implemented as pwm-regulator there.
> 
> Last time I tried to put this into linux-next I got immediately
> bombarded by a number of build failures, so I backed things out. The
> current plan is to give this another try after v4.4-rc1.

Could you paste the build failures (I didn't receive any notification)?
BTW, I just rebased my branch on pwm/for-next and it seems to compile
correctly, but maybe you're compiling on more platforms (or different
drivers than I do).

Best Regards,

Boris



-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web