Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1263536 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] CPPC-CPUFreq: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree"

Started bySF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
First post2015-11-05 21:20 +0100
Last post2015-11-07 01:50 +0100
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH] CPPC-CPUFreq: Delete an unnecessary check before the function  call "kfree" SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> - 2015-11-05 21:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] CPPC-CPUFreq: Delete an unnecessary check before the  function call "kfree" Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> - 2015-11-06 02:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] CPPC-CPUFreq: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree" "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2015-11-07 01:50 +0100

#1263536 — [PATCH] CPPC-CPUFreq: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree"

FromSF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date2015-11-05 21:20 +0100
Subject[PATCH] CPPC-CPUFreq: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree"
Message-ID<qrzaO-2TZ-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 21:10:29 +0100

The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.

This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.

Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
index 93c219f..e8cb334 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
@@ -166,8 +166,7 @@ static int __init cppc_cpufreq_init(void)
 
 out:
 	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
-		if (all_cpu_data[i])
-			kfree(all_cpu_data[i]);
+		kfree(all_cpu_data[i]);
 
 	kfree(all_cpu_data);
 	return -ENODEV;
-- 
2.6.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1263694 — Re: [PATCH] CPPC-CPUFreq: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree"

FromViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date2015-11-06 02:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] CPPC-CPUFreq: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree"
Message-ID<qrEka-6l9-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1263536
On 05-11-15, 21:15, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 21:10:29 +0100
> 
> The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
> returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
> 
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1264676 — Re: [PATCH] CPPC-CPUFreq: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree"

From"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Date2015-11-07 01:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] CPPC-CPUFreq: Delete an unnecessary check before the function call "kfree"
Message-ID<qrZRD-3rI-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1263694
On Friday, November 06, 2015 07:12:28 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 05-11-15, 21:15, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 21:10:29 +0100
> > 
> > The kfree() function tests whether its argument is NULL and then
> > returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
> > 
> > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Applied, thanks!

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web