Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1263272 > unrolled thread
| Started by | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-05 15:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-06 17:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] Ext4: Fix extended timestamp encoding and decoding David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2015-11-05 15:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Ext4: Fix extended timestamp encoding and decoding Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2015-11-05 16:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Ext4: Fix extended timestamp encoding and decoding "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> - 2015-11-05 19:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Ext4: Fix extended timestamp encoding and decoding David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2015-11-05 20:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Ext4: Fix extended timestamp encoding and decoding Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2015-11-06 17:00 +0100
| From | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-05 15:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] Ext4: Fix extended timestamp encoding and decoding |
| Message-ID | <qru1t-7Yg-51@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The handling of extended timestamps in Ext4 is broken as can be seen in the
output of the test program attached below:
time extra bad decode good decode bad encode good encode
======== ===== ================= ================= =========== ===========
ffffffff 0 > ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff > *ffffffff 3 ffffffff 0
80000000 0 > ffffffff80000000 ffffffff80000000 > *80000000 3 80000000 0
00000000 0 > 0 0 > 00000000 0 00000000 0
7fffffff 0 > 7fffffff 7fffffff > 7fffffff 0 7fffffff 0
80000000 1 > *ffffffff80000000 80000000 > *80000000 0 80000000 1
ffffffff 1 > *ffffffffffffffff ffffffff > *ffffffff 0 ffffffff 1
00000000 1 > 100000000 100000000 > 00000000 1 00000000 1
7fffffff 1 > 17fffffff 17fffffff > 7fffffff 1 7fffffff 1
80000000 2 > *ffffffff80000000 180000000 > *80000000 1 80000000 2
ffffffff 2 > *ffffffffffffffff 1ffffffff > *ffffffff 1 ffffffff 2
00000000 2 > 200000000 200000000 > 00000000 2 00000000 2
7fffffff 2 > 27fffffff 27fffffff > 7fffffff 2 7fffffff 2
80000000 3 > *ffffffff80000000 280000000 > *80000000 2 80000000 3
ffffffff 3 > *ffffffffffffffff 2ffffffff > *ffffffff 2 ffffffff 3
00000000 3 > 300000000 300000000 > 00000000 3 00000000 3
7fffffff 3 > 37fffffff 37fffffff > 7fffffff 3 7fffffff 3
The values marked with asterisks are wrong.
The problem is that with a 64-bit time, in ext4_decode_extra_time() the
epoch value is just OR'd with the sign-extended time - which, if negative,
has all of the upper 32 bits set anyway. We need to add the epoch instead
of OR'ing it. In ext4_encode_extra_time(), the reverse operation needs to
take place as the 32-bit part of the number of seconds needs to be
subtracted from the 64-bit value before the epoch is shifted down.
Since the epoch is presumably unsigned, this has the slightly strange
effect of, for epochs > 0, putting the 0x80000000-0xffffffff range before
the 0x00000000-0x7fffffff range.
This affects all kernels from v2.6.23-rc1 onwards.
The test program:
#include <stdio.h>
#define EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(x, y, z) 1
#define EXT4_EPOCH_BITS 2
#define EXT4_EPOCH_MASK ((1 << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) - 1)
#define EXT4_NSEC_MASK (~0UL << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS)
#define le32_to_cpu(x) (x)
#define cpu_to_le32(x) (x)
typedef unsigned int __le32;
typedef unsigned int u32;
typedef signed int s32;
typedef unsigned long long __u64;
typedef signed long long s64;
struct timespec {
long long tv_sec; /* seconds */
long tv_nsec; /* nanoseconds */
};
struct ext4_inode_info {
struct timespec i_crtime;
};
struct ext4_inode {
__le32 i_crtime; /* File Creation time */
__le32 i_crtime_extra; /* extra FileCreationtime (nsec << 2 | epoch) */
};
/* Incorrect implementation */
static inline void ext4_decode_extra_time_bad(struct timespec *time, __le32 extra)
{
if (sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4)
time->tv_sec |= (__u64)(le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK)
<< 32;
time->tv_nsec = (le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK) >> EXT4_EPOCH_BITS;
}
static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time_bad(struct timespec *time)
{
return cpu_to_le32((sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4 ?
(time->tv_sec >> 32) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK : 0) |
((time->tv_nsec << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK));
}
/* Fixed implementation */
static inline void ext4_decode_extra_time_good(struct timespec *time, __le32 _extra)
{
u32 extra = le32_to_cpu(_extra);
u32 epoch = extra & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
time->tv_sec = (s32)time->tv_sec + ((s64)epoch << 32);
time->tv_nsec = (extra & EXT4_NSEC_MASK) >> EXT4_EPOCH_BITS;
}
static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time_good(struct timespec *time)
{
u32 extra;
s64 epoch = time->tv_sec - (s32)time->tv_sec;
extra = (epoch >> 32) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
extra |= (time->tv_nsec << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK;
return cpu_to_le32(extra);
}
#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME_BAD(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \
do { \
(inode)->xtime.tv_sec = (signed)le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)->xtime); \
if (EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw_inode, EXT4_I(inode), xtime ## _extra)) \
ext4_decode_extra_time_bad(&(inode)->xtime, \
raw_inode->xtime ## _extra); \
else \
(inode)->xtime.tv_nsec = 0; \
} while (0)
#define EXT4_INODE_SET_XTIME_BAD(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \
do { \
(raw_inode)->xtime = cpu_to_le32((inode)->xtime.tv_sec); \
if (EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw_inode, EXT4_I(inode), xtime ## _extra)) \
(raw_inode)->xtime ## _extra = \
ext4_encode_extra_time_bad(&(inode)->xtime); \
} while (0)
#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME_GOOD(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \
do { \
(inode)->xtime.tv_sec = (signed)le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)->xtime); \
if (EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw_inode, EXT4_I(inode), xtime ## _extra)) \
ext4_decode_extra_time_good(&(inode)->xtime, \
raw_inode->xtime ## _extra); \
else \
(inode)->xtime.tv_nsec = 0; \
} while (0)
#define EXT4_INODE_SET_XTIME_GOOD(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \
do { \
(raw_inode)->xtime = cpu_to_le32((inode)->xtime.tv_sec); \
if (EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw_inode, EXT4_I(inode), xtime ## _extra)) \
(raw_inode)->xtime ## _extra = \
ext4_encode_extra_time_good(&(inode)->xtime); \
} while (0)
static const struct test {
unsigned crtime;
unsigned extra;
long long sec;
int nsec;
} tests[] = {
// crtime extra tv_sec tv_nsec
0xffffffff, 0x00000000, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0,
0x80000000, 0x00000000, 0xffffffff80000000, 0,
0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x0000000000000000, 0,
0x7fffffff, 0x00000000, 0x000000007fffffff, 0,
0x80000000, 0x00000001, 0x0000000080000000, 0,
0xffffffff, 0x00000001, 0x00000000ffffffff, 0,
0x00000000, 0x00000001, 0x0000000100000000, 0,
0x7fffffff, 0x00000001, 0x000000017fffffff, 0,
0x80000000, 0x00000002, 0x0000000180000000, 0,
0xffffffff, 0x00000002, 0x00000001ffffffff, 0,
0x00000000, 0x00000002, 0x0000000200000000, 0,
0x7fffffff, 0x00000002, 0x000000027fffffff, 0,
0x80000000, 0x00000003, 0x0000000280000000, 0,
0xffffffff, 0x00000003, 0x00000002ffffffff, 0,
0x00000000, 0x00000003, 0x0000000300000000, 0,
0x7fffffff, 0x00000003, 0x000000037fffffff, 0,
};
int main()
{
struct ext4_inode_info ii_bad, ii_good;
struct ext4_inode raw, *praw = &raw;
struct ext4_inode raw_bad, *praw_bad = &raw_bad;
struct ext4_inode raw_good, *praw_good = &raw_good;
const struct test *t;
int i, ret = 0;
printf("time extra bad decode good decode bad encode good encode\n");
printf("======== ===== ================= ================= =========== ===========\n");
for (i = 0; i < sizeof(tests) / sizeof(t[0]); i++) {
t = &tests[i];
raw.i_crtime = t->crtime;
raw.i_crtime_extra = t->extra;
printf("%08x %5d > ", t->crtime, t->extra);
EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME_BAD(i_crtime, &ii_bad, praw);
EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME_GOOD(i_crtime, &ii_good, praw);
if (ii_bad.i_crtime.tv_sec != t->sec ||
ii_bad.i_crtime.tv_nsec != t->nsec)
printf("*");
else
printf(" ");
printf("%16llx", ii_bad.i_crtime.tv_sec);
printf(" ");
if (ii_good.i_crtime.tv_sec != t->sec ||
ii_good.i_crtime.tv_nsec != t->nsec) {
printf("*");
ret = 1;
} else {
printf(" ");
}
printf("%16llx", ii_good.i_crtime.tv_sec);
EXT4_INODE_SET_XTIME_BAD(i_crtime, &ii_good, praw_bad);
EXT4_INODE_SET_XTIME_GOOD(i_crtime, &ii_good, praw_good);
printf(" > ");
if (raw_bad.i_crtime != raw.i_crtime ||
raw_bad.i_crtime_extra != raw.i_crtime_extra)
printf("*");
else
printf(" ");
printf("%08llx %d", raw_bad.i_crtime, raw_bad.i_crtime_extra);
printf(" ");
if (raw_good.i_crtime != raw.i_crtime ||
raw_good.i_crtime_extra != raw.i_crtime_extra) {
printf("*");
ret = 1;
} else {
printf(" ");
}
printf("%08llx %d", raw_good.i_crtime, raw_good.i_crtime_extra);
printf("\n");
}
return ret;
}
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 22 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index fd1f28be5296..31efcd78bf51 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -723,19 +723,23 @@ struct move_extent {
<= (EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE + \
(einode)->i_extra_isize)) \
-static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time(struct timespec *time)
+static inline void ext4_decode_extra_time(struct timespec *time, __le32 _extra)
{
- return cpu_to_le32((sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4 ?
- (time->tv_sec >> 32) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK : 0) |
- ((time->tv_nsec << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK));
+ u32 extra = le32_to_cpu(_extra);
+ u32 epoch = extra & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
+
+ time->tv_sec = (s32)time->tv_sec + ((s64)epoch << 32);
+ time->tv_nsec = (extra & EXT4_NSEC_MASK) >> EXT4_EPOCH_BITS;
}
-static inline void ext4_decode_extra_time(struct timespec *time, __le32 extra)
+static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time(struct timespec *time)
{
- if (sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4)
- time->tv_sec |= (__u64)(le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK)
- << 32;
- time->tv_nsec = (le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK) >> EXT4_EPOCH_BITS;
+ u32 extra;
+ s64 epoch = time->tv_sec - (s32)time->tv_sec;
+
+ extra = (epoch >> 32) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
+ extra |= (time->tv_nsec << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK;
+ return cpu_to_le32(extra);
}
#define EXT4_INODE_SET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-05 16:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qrub8-81X-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1263272 |
On Thursday 05 November 2015 14:49:16 David Howells wrote: > Since the epoch is presumably unsigned, this has the slightly strange > effect of, for epochs > 0, putting the 0x80000000-0xffffffff range before > the 0x00000000-0x7fffffff range. > > This affects all kernels from v2.6.23-rc1 onwards. ... > Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Maybe Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v2.6.23+ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-05 19:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qrxiH-1JR-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1263272 |
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 02:49:16PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> The handling of extended timestamps in Ext4 is broken as can be seen in the
> output of the test program attached below:
>
> time extra bad decode good decode bad encode good encode
> ======== ===== ================= ================= =========== ===========
> ffffffff 0 > ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff > *ffffffff 3 ffffffff 0
> 80000000 0 > ffffffff80000000 ffffffff80000000 > *80000000 3 80000000 0
> 00000000 0 > 0 0 > 00000000 0 00000000 0
> 7fffffff 0 > 7fffffff 7fffffff > 7fffffff 0 7fffffff 0
> 80000000 1 > *ffffffff80000000 80000000 > *80000000 0 80000000 1
> ffffffff 1 > *ffffffffffffffff ffffffff > *ffffffff 0 ffffffff 1
> 00000000 1 > 100000000 100000000 > 00000000 1 00000000 1
> 7fffffff 1 > 17fffffff 17fffffff > 7fffffff 1 7fffffff 1
> 80000000 2 > *ffffffff80000000 180000000 > *80000000 1 80000000 2
> ffffffff 2 > *ffffffffffffffff 1ffffffff > *ffffffff 1 ffffffff 2
> 00000000 2 > 200000000 200000000 > 00000000 2 00000000 2
> 7fffffff 2 > 27fffffff 27fffffff > 7fffffff 2 7fffffff 2
> 80000000 3 > *ffffffff80000000 280000000 > *80000000 2 80000000 3
> ffffffff 3 > *ffffffffffffffff 2ffffffff > *ffffffff 2 ffffffff 3
> 00000000 3 > 300000000 300000000 > 00000000 3 00000000 3
> 7fffffff 3 > 37fffffff 37fffffff > 7fffffff 3 7fffffff 3
>
> The values marked with asterisks are wrong.
>
> The problem is that with a 64-bit time, in ext4_decode_extra_time() the
> epoch value is just OR'd with the sign-extended time - which, if negative,
> has all of the upper 32 bits set anyway. We need to add the epoch instead
> of OR'ing it. In ext4_encode_extra_time(), the reverse operation needs to
> take place as the 32-bit part of the number of seconds needs to be
> subtracted from the 64-bit value before the epoch is shifted down.
There's been a patch to fix this for a very long time:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/40978
and
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23732
...but I guess nobody ever developed the e2fsprogs regression tests that Ted
asked for, so none of the patches got merged. Ho hum.
Kernel patch looks ok though.
--D
>
> Since the epoch is presumably unsigned, this has the slightly strange
> effect of, for epochs > 0, putting the 0x80000000-0xffffffff range before
> the 0x00000000-0x7fffffff range.
>
> This affects all kernels from v2.6.23-rc1 onwards.
>
> The test program:
>
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> #define EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(x, y, z) 1
> #define EXT4_EPOCH_BITS 2
> #define EXT4_EPOCH_MASK ((1 << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) - 1)
> #define EXT4_NSEC_MASK (~0UL << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS)
>
> #define le32_to_cpu(x) (x)
> #define cpu_to_le32(x) (x)
> typedef unsigned int __le32;
> typedef unsigned int u32;
> typedef signed int s32;
> typedef unsigned long long __u64;
> typedef signed long long s64;
>
> struct timespec {
> long long tv_sec; /* seconds */
> long tv_nsec; /* nanoseconds */
> };
>
> struct ext4_inode_info {
> struct timespec i_crtime;
> };
>
> struct ext4_inode {
> __le32 i_crtime; /* File Creation time */
> __le32 i_crtime_extra; /* extra FileCreationtime (nsec << 2 | epoch) */
> };
>
> /* Incorrect implementation */
> static inline void ext4_decode_extra_time_bad(struct timespec *time, __le32 extra)
> {
> if (sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4)
> time->tv_sec |= (__u64)(le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK)
> << 32;
> time->tv_nsec = (le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK) >> EXT4_EPOCH_BITS;
> }
>
> static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time_bad(struct timespec *time)
> {
> return cpu_to_le32((sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4 ?
> (time->tv_sec >> 32) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK : 0) |
> ((time->tv_nsec << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK));
> }
>
> /* Fixed implementation */
> static inline void ext4_decode_extra_time_good(struct timespec *time, __le32 _extra)
> {
> u32 extra = le32_to_cpu(_extra);
> u32 epoch = extra & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
>
> time->tv_sec = (s32)time->tv_sec + ((s64)epoch << 32);
> time->tv_nsec = (extra & EXT4_NSEC_MASK) >> EXT4_EPOCH_BITS;
> }
>
> static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time_good(struct timespec *time)
> {
> u32 extra;
> s64 epoch = time->tv_sec - (s32)time->tv_sec;
>
> extra = (epoch >> 32) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
> extra |= (time->tv_nsec << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK;
> return cpu_to_le32(extra);
> }
>
> #define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME_BAD(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \
> do { \
> (inode)->xtime.tv_sec = (signed)le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)->xtime); \
> if (EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw_inode, EXT4_I(inode), xtime ## _extra)) \
> ext4_decode_extra_time_bad(&(inode)->xtime, \
> raw_inode->xtime ## _extra); \
> else \
> (inode)->xtime.tv_nsec = 0; \
> } while (0)
>
> #define EXT4_INODE_SET_XTIME_BAD(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \
> do { \
> (raw_inode)->xtime = cpu_to_le32((inode)->xtime.tv_sec); \
> if (EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw_inode, EXT4_I(inode), xtime ## _extra)) \
> (raw_inode)->xtime ## _extra = \
> ext4_encode_extra_time_bad(&(inode)->xtime); \
> } while (0)
>
> #define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME_GOOD(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \
> do { \
> (inode)->xtime.tv_sec = (signed)le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)->xtime); \
> if (EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw_inode, EXT4_I(inode), xtime ## _extra)) \
> ext4_decode_extra_time_good(&(inode)->xtime, \
> raw_inode->xtime ## _extra); \
> else \
> (inode)->xtime.tv_nsec = 0; \
> } while (0)
>
> #define EXT4_INODE_SET_XTIME_GOOD(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \
> do { \
> (raw_inode)->xtime = cpu_to_le32((inode)->xtime.tv_sec); \
> if (EXT4_FITS_IN_INODE(raw_inode, EXT4_I(inode), xtime ## _extra)) \
> (raw_inode)->xtime ## _extra = \
> ext4_encode_extra_time_good(&(inode)->xtime); \
> } while (0)
>
> static const struct test {
> unsigned crtime;
> unsigned extra;
> long long sec;
> int nsec;
> } tests[] = {
> // crtime extra tv_sec tv_nsec
> 0xffffffff, 0x00000000, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0,
> 0x80000000, 0x00000000, 0xffffffff80000000, 0,
> 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x0000000000000000, 0,
> 0x7fffffff, 0x00000000, 0x000000007fffffff, 0,
> 0x80000000, 0x00000001, 0x0000000080000000, 0,
> 0xffffffff, 0x00000001, 0x00000000ffffffff, 0,
> 0x00000000, 0x00000001, 0x0000000100000000, 0,
> 0x7fffffff, 0x00000001, 0x000000017fffffff, 0,
> 0x80000000, 0x00000002, 0x0000000180000000, 0,
> 0xffffffff, 0x00000002, 0x00000001ffffffff, 0,
> 0x00000000, 0x00000002, 0x0000000200000000, 0,
> 0x7fffffff, 0x00000002, 0x000000027fffffff, 0,
> 0x80000000, 0x00000003, 0x0000000280000000, 0,
> 0xffffffff, 0x00000003, 0x00000002ffffffff, 0,
> 0x00000000, 0x00000003, 0x0000000300000000, 0,
> 0x7fffffff, 0x00000003, 0x000000037fffffff, 0,
> };
>
> int main()
> {
> struct ext4_inode_info ii_bad, ii_good;
> struct ext4_inode raw, *praw = &raw;
> struct ext4_inode raw_bad, *praw_bad = &raw_bad;
> struct ext4_inode raw_good, *praw_good = &raw_good;
> const struct test *t;
> int i, ret = 0;
>
> printf("time extra bad decode good decode bad encode good encode\n");
> printf("======== ===== ================= ================= =========== ===========\n");
> for (i = 0; i < sizeof(tests) / sizeof(t[0]); i++) {
> t = &tests[i];
> raw.i_crtime = t->crtime;
> raw.i_crtime_extra = t->extra;
> printf("%08x %5d > ", t->crtime, t->extra);
>
> EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME_BAD(i_crtime, &ii_bad, praw);
> EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME_GOOD(i_crtime, &ii_good, praw);
> if (ii_bad.i_crtime.tv_sec != t->sec ||
> ii_bad.i_crtime.tv_nsec != t->nsec)
> printf("*");
> else
> printf(" ");
> printf("%16llx", ii_bad.i_crtime.tv_sec);
> printf(" ");
> if (ii_good.i_crtime.tv_sec != t->sec ||
> ii_good.i_crtime.tv_nsec != t->nsec) {
> printf("*");
> ret = 1;
> } else {
> printf(" ");
> }
> printf("%16llx", ii_good.i_crtime.tv_sec);
>
> EXT4_INODE_SET_XTIME_BAD(i_crtime, &ii_good, praw_bad);
> EXT4_INODE_SET_XTIME_GOOD(i_crtime, &ii_good, praw_good);
>
> printf(" > ");
> if (raw_bad.i_crtime != raw.i_crtime ||
> raw_bad.i_crtime_extra != raw.i_crtime_extra)
> printf("*");
> else
> printf(" ");
> printf("%08llx %d", raw_bad.i_crtime, raw_bad.i_crtime_extra);
> printf(" ");
>
> if (raw_good.i_crtime != raw.i_crtime ||
> raw_good.i_crtime_extra != raw.i_crtime_extra) {
> printf("*");
> ret = 1;
> } else {
> printf(" ");
> }
> printf("%08llx %d", raw_good.i_crtime, raw_good.i_crtime_extra);
> printf("\n");
> }
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index fd1f28be5296..31efcd78bf51 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -723,19 +723,23 @@ struct move_extent {
> <= (EXT4_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE + \
> (einode)->i_extra_isize)) \
>
> -static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time(struct timespec *time)
> +static inline void ext4_decode_extra_time(struct timespec *time, __le32 _extra)
> {
> - return cpu_to_le32((sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4 ?
> - (time->tv_sec >> 32) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK : 0) |
> - ((time->tv_nsec << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK));
> + u32 extra = le32_to_cpu(_extra);
> + u32 epoch = extra & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
> +
> + time->tv_sec = (s32)time->tv_sec + ((s64)epoch << 32);
> + time->tv_nsec = (extra & EXT4_NSEC_MASK) >> EXT4_EPOCH_BITS;
> }
>
> -static inline void ext4_decode_extra_time(struct timespec *time, __le32 extra)
> +static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time(struct timespec *time)
> {
> - if (sizeof(time->tv_sec) > 4)
> - time->tv_sec |= (__u64)(le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK)
> - << 32;
> - time->tv_nsec = (le32_to_cpu(extra) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK) >> EXT4_EPOCH_BITS;
> + u32 extra;
> + s64 epoch = time->tv_sec - (s32)time->tv_sec;
> +
> + extra = (epoch >> 32) & EXT4_EPOCH_MASK;
> + extra |= (time->tv_nsec << EXT4_EPOCH_BITS) & EXT4_NSEC_MASK;
> + return cpu_to_le32(extra);
> }
>
> #define EXT4_INODE_SET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-05 20:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qryoq-2og-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1263468 |
Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> wrote: > There's been a patch to fix this for a very long time: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/40978 So I see, though that patch doesn't also fix the encode case. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-06 17:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qrRAL-6pR-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1263468 |
On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 10:14:24AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> ...but I guess nobody ever developed the e2fsprogs regression tests that Ted
> asked for, so none of the patches got merged. Ho hum.
I haven't forgotten, and it's been put on my "if you want to do it
right, you'll have to do it yourself list". That plus the fact that
some of my work had hard deadlines in the near-term future (e.g., ext4
encryption), and long-term deadlines, is why it hasn't happened yet.
It is still something that is on my list when I have some free time,
but I would be very happy if someone were willing to help out.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web