Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1264582 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-06 23:00 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-06 23:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v4] um: net: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC when spinlock is held Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> - 2015-11-06 23:00 +0100
| From | Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-06 23:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4] um: net: replace GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC when spinlock is held |
| Message-ID | <qrXd8-1Iu-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Am 29.10.2015 um 16:30 schrieb Saurabh Sengar: > since GFP_KERNEL with GFP_ATOMIC while spinlock is held, > as code while holding a spinlock should be atomic. > GFP_KERNEL may sleep and can cause deadlock, > where as GFP_ATOMIC may fail but certainly avoids deadlockdex f70dd54..d898f6c 100644 > > Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <saurabh.truth@gmail.com> Applied! Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web