Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1260909 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-02 20:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-03 21:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[v4.1.10-rt10][PATCH 0/2] PCI: dra7xx/dwc: fix "WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 82 at kernel/irq/handle.c:150 handle_irq_event_percpu" Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2015-11-02 20:40 +0100
[v4.1.10-rt10][PATCH 1/2] genirq: introduce new generic_handle_irq_rt_wa() api Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2015-11-02 20:40 +0100
[v4.1.10-rt10] [PATCH 2/2] PCI: dra7xx: fix "WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 82 at kernel/irq/handle.c:150 handle_irq_event_percpu" Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2015-11-02 20:40 +0100
Re: [v4.1.10-rt10][PATCH 0/2] PCI: dra7xx/dwc: fix "WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 82 at kernel/irq/handle.c:150 handle_irq_event_percpu" Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-03 14:50 +0100
Re: [v4.1.10-rt10][PATCH 0/2] PCI: dra7xx/dwc: fix "WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 82 at kernel/irq/handle.c:150 handle_irq_event_percpu" Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2015-11-03 20:20 +0100
Re: [v4.1.10-rt10][PATCH 0/2] PCI: dra7xx/dwc: fix "WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 82 at kernel/irq/handle.c:150 handle_irq_event_percpu" Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2015-11-03 21:10 +0100
| From | Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 20:40 +0100 |
| Subject | [v4.1.10-rt10][PATCH 0/2] PCI: dra7xx/dwc: fix "WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 82 at kernel/irq/handle.c:150 handle_irq_event_percpu" |
| Message-ID | <qqt7r-R4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Now in kernel below code pattern is used by many drivers:
static irqreturn_t driver_xx_hw_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
{
<read IRQ status register>
<perform HW specific operations>
for (<each set bit in IRQ status register>) {
<get Linux IRQ number>
generic_handle_irq(<Linux IRQ number>);
|- handle_simple_irq()
|-or- handle_level_irq()
|-or- handle_edge_irq()
|-handle_irq_event()
|-handle_irq_event_percpu()
===
"WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 82 at kernel/irq/handle.c:150 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x14c/0x174()
irq 460 handler irq_default_primary_handler+0x0/0x14 enabled interrupts"
===
}
}
On -RT above code will generate warnings, because driver_xx_hw_irq_handler()
will be forced threaded (by default) and, as result, generic_handle_irq()
will be called with IRQs enabled. To W/A this issue generic_handle_irq() can
be surrounded by raw_spin_lock_irqsave/irqrestore(wa_lock).
Instead of spreading this W/A directly in many drivers this series
introduces -RT specific version of generic_handle_irq() API -
generic_handle_irq_rt_wa(). This new generic_handle_irq_rt_wa() just calls
generic_handle_irq() surrounded by raw_spin_lock_irqsave/irqrestore().
If -RT is disabled It will fallback to generic_handle_irq().
And generic_handle_irq_rt_wa() is used then to W/A similar issues
in pcie-designware.c and pcie-dra7xx.c.
Grygorii Strashko (2):
genirq: introduce new generic_handle_irq_rt_wa() api
PCI: dra7xx: fix "WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 82 at kernel/irq/handle.c:150
handle_irq_event_percpu"
drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c | 3 ++-
drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 2 +-
include/linux/irqdesc.h | 5 +++++
kernel/irq/irqdesc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.6.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 20:40 +0100 |
| Subject | [v4.1.10-rt10][PATCH 1/2] genirq: introduce new generic_handle_irq_rt_wa() api |
| Message-ID | <qqt7r-R4-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1260909 |
Now in kernel below code pattern is used by many drivers:
static irqreturn_t driver_xx_hw_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
{
<read IRQ status register>
<perform HW specific operations>
for (<each set bit in IRQ status register>) {
<get Linux IRQ number>
generic_handle_irq(<Linux IRQ number>);
|- handle_simple_irq()
|-or- handle_level_irq()
|-or- handle_edge_irq()
|-handle_irq_event()
|-handle_irq_event_percpu()
===
"WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 82 at kernel/irq/handle.c:150 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x14c/0x174()
irq 460 handler irq_default_primary_handler+0x0/0x14 enabled interrupts"
===
}
}
On -RT above code will generate warnings, because driver_xx_hw_irq_handler()
will be forced threaded (by default) and, as result, generic_handle_irq()
will be called with IRQs enabled. To W/A this issue generic_handle_irq() can
be surrounded by raw_spin_lock_irqsave/irqrestore(wa_lock).
Instead of spreading this W/A directly in many drivers this patch
introduces -RT specific version of generic_handle_irq() API -
generic_handle_irq_rt_wa(). This new generic_handle_irq_rt_wa() just calls
generic_handle_irq() surrounded by raw_spin_lock_irqsave/irqrestore().
If -RT is disabled It will fallback to generic_handle_irq().
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
---
include/linux/irqdesc.h | 5 +++++
kernel/irq/irqdesc.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/irqdesc.h b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
index 9d97cd5..beea9a5 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqdesc.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
@@ -131,6 +131,11 @@ static inline void generic_handle_irq_desc(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *de
}
int generic_handle_irq(unsigned int irq);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+int generic_handle_irq_rt_wa(unsigned int irq);
+#else
+#define generic_handle_irq_rt_wa generic_handle_irq
+#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_HANDLE_DOMAIN_IRQ
/*
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
index 99793b9..b77e01b 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdesc.c
@@ -353,6 +353,25 @@ int generic_handle_irq(unsigned int irq)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(generic_handle_irq);
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+int generic_handle_irq_rt_wa(unsigned int irq)
+{
+ struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
+ DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(wa_lock);
+ unsigned long wa_lock_flags;
+
+ if (!desc)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&wa_lock, wa_lock_flags);
+ generic_handle_irq_desc(irq, desc);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wa_lock, wa_lock_flags);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(generic_handle_irq_rt_wa);
+#endif
+
#ifdef CONFIG_HANDLE_DOMAIN_IRQ
/**
* __handle_domain_irq - Invoke the handler for a HW irq belonging to a domain
--
2.6.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 20:40 +0100 |
| Subject | [v4.1.10-rt10] [PATCH 2/2] PCI: dra7xx: fix "WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 82 at kernel/irq/handle.c:150 handle_irq_event_percpu" |
| Message-ID | <qqt7s-R4-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1260909 |
Use generic_handle_irq_rt_wa() to W/A below backtrace, which is triggered because dra7xx_pcie_msi_irq_handler() forced to be threaded on -RT: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 82 at kernel/irq/handle.c:150 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x14c/0x174() irq 460 handler irq_default_primary_handler+0x0/0x14 enabled interrupts Modules linked in: ahci_platform(+) ti_vip(+) libahci_platform xhci_pci(+) c_can_platform(+) libahci xhci_hcd ti_vpe c_can libata v4l2_mem2mem can_dev gpio_keys leds_gpio snd_soc_simple_card usbcore spi_ti_qspi videobuf2_core extcon_usb_gpio omap_wdt ti_vpdma videobuf2_dma_contig ti_soc_thermal videobuf2_memops dwc3_omap extcon rtc_omap ov1063x v4l2_common videodev media snd_soc_tlv320aic3x omap_rng rng_core omap_remoteproc CPU: 1 PID: 82 Comm: irq/26-dra7-pci Not tainted 4.1.10-rt10-02638-g6486d7e-dirty #1 Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree) Backtrace: [<c0013060>] (dump_backtrace) from [<c0013280>] (show_stack+0x18/0x1c) r7:c07acca0 r6:00000000 r5:c09034e4 r4:00000000 [<c0013268>] (show_stack) from [<c061ef14>] (dump_stack+0x90/0xac) [<c061ee84>] (dump_stack) from [<c00436e4>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0xb8) r7:c07acca0 r6:00000096 r5:00000009 r4:ee4d3e38 [<c0043668>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c0043758>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x38/0x40) r8:ee3fcc00 r7:000001cc r6:00000000 r5:00000002 r4:c07acc78 [<c0043724>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c0085fd0>] (handle_irq_event_percpu+0x14c/0x174) r3:000001cc r2:c07acc78 r4:ecfcdd80 [<c0085e84>] (handle_irq_event_percpu) from [<c008607c>] (handle_irq_event+0x84/0xb8) r10:00000001 r9:ee4b59c0 r8:ee1d0900 r7:00000001 r6:00000000 r5:ecfcdd80 r4:ee3fcc00 [<c0085ff8>] (handle_irq_event) from [<c0089240>] (handle_simple_irq+0x90/0x118) r5:ee4a9020 r4:ee3fcc00 [<c00891b0>] (handle_simple_irq) from [<c0085514>] (generic_handle_irq+0x30/0x44) r5:ee4a9020 r4:000001cc [<c00854e4>] (generic_handle_irq) from [<c034a7d4>] (dra7xx_pcie_msi_irq_handler+0x7c/0x8c) r5:ee4a9020 r4:00000001 [<c034a758>] (dra7xx_pcie_msi_irq_handler) from [<c0086f08>] (irq_forced_thread_fn+0x28/0x5c) r5:ee1d0900 r4:ee4b59c0 [<c0086ee0>] (irq_forced_thread_fn) from [<c00871dc>] (irq_thread+0x128/0x204) r7:00000001 r6:00000000 r5:ee4d2000 r4:ee4b59e4 [<c00870b4>] (irq_thread) from [<c005e2fc>] (kthread+0xd4/0xec) r10:00000000 r9:00000000 r8:00000000 r7:c00870b4 r6:ee4b59c0 r5:ee4b5a00 r4:00000000 [<c005e228>] (kthread) from [<c000faa8>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x2c) r7:00000000 r6:00000000 r5:c005e228 r4:ee4b5a00 ---[ end trace 0000000000000002 ]--- Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> --- drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c | 3 ++- drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c index 6589e7e..8c241cb 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-dra7xx.c @@ -220,7 +220,8 @@ static irqreturn_t dra7xx_pcie_msi_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg) case INTB: case INTC: case INTD: - generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(pp->irq_domain, ffs(reg))); + generic_handle_irq_rt_wa(irq_find_mapping(pp->irq_domain, + ffs(reg))); break; } diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c index 2e9f84f..6ba0ee3 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ irqreturn_t dw_handle_msi_irq(struct pcie_port *pp) dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_STATUS + i * 12, 4, 1 << pos); - generic_handle_irq(irq); + generic_handle_irq_rt_wa(irq); pos++; } } -- 2.6.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 14:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [v4.1.10-rt10][PATCH 0/2] PCI: dra7xx/dwc: fix "WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 82 at kernel/irq/handle.c:150 handle_irq_event_percpu" |
| Message-ID | <qqK8j-3mL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1260909 |
On 11/02/2015 08:30 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > On -RT above code will generate warnings, because driver_xx_hw_irq_handler() > will be forced threaded (by default) and, as result, generic_handle_irq() > will be called with IRQs enabled. To W/A this issue generic_handle_irq() can > be surrounded by raw_spin_lock_irqsave/irqrestore(wa_lock). and what happens without -RT if you boot threadedirqs? Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 20:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [v4.1.10-rt10][PATCH 0/2] PCI: dra7xx/dwc: fix "WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 82 at kernel/irq/handle.c:150 handle_irq_event_percpu" |
| Message-ID | <qqPhE-6WD-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1261504 |
On 11/03/2015 03:46 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 11/02/2015 08:30 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >> On -RT above code will generate warnings, because driver_xx_hw_irq_handler() >> will be forced threaded (by default) and, as result, generic_handle_irq() >> will be called with IRQs enabled. To W/A this issue generic_handle_irq() can >> be surrounded by raw_spin_lock_irqsave/irqrestore(wa_lock). > > and what happens without -RT if you boot threadedirqs? > Yep. It will still warn :( Can be reworked to cover this case also, i think (if overall concept will be accepted) Thanks. -- regards, -grygorii -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 21:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [v4.1.10-rt10][PATCH 0/2] PCI: dra7xx/dwc: fix "WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 82 at kernel/irq/handle.c:150 handle_irq_event_percpu" |
| Message-ID | <qqQ42-7sq-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1261805 |
On Tue, 3 Nov 2015, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > On 11/03/2015 03:46 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > On 11/02/2015 08:30 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > >> On -RT above code will generate warnings, because driver_xx_hw_irq_handler() > >> will be forced threaded (by default) and, as result, generic_handle_irq() > >> will be called with IRQs enabled. To W/A this issue generic_handle_irq() can > >> be surrounded by raw_spin_lock_irqsave/irqrestore(wa_lock). > > > > and what happens without -RT if you boot threadedirqs? > > > > Yep. It will still warn :( Can be reworked to cover this case also, i think > (if overall concept will be accepted) wa_lock - I read that "Warning Annihilation Lock" - does not really qualify as a concept. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web