Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1260483 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-02 10:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-02 16:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] Documentation: tps65912: Add DT bindings for the TPS65912 PMIC Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-11-02 10:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] Documentation: tps65912: Add DT bindings for the TPS65912 PMIC "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> - 2015-11-02 16:20 +0100
| From | Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 10:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] Documentation: tps65912: Add DT bindings for the TPS65912 PMIC |
| Message-ID | <qqjrs-3wz-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > On 10/30/2015 02:06 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > >On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > > > >>On 10/30/2015 12:10 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > >>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > >>> > >>>>The TPS65912 PMIC contains several regulators and a GPIO controller. > >>>>Add bindings for the TPS65912 PMIC. > >>>> > >>>>Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com> > >>>>--- > >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-tps65912.txt | 16 +++++++ > >>> > >>>Why have you dropped Linus' Review-by? > >>> > >> > >>Strange, I thought I made a change to this. Well this brings up a question, > >>how much change can we have before we are supposed to drop Reviewed/Acked-by? > > > >Common sense call I'm afraid. ;) > > > >[...] > > > >>>>+ the second cell is used to specify flags. > >>>>+ See include/dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h for possible values. > >>> > >>>This is a Linuxisum and shouldn't really live in here. > >>> > >>>I think it would be better to document them in ../gpio/gpio.txt and > >>>reference that instead. > >>> > >> > >>Looks like that is already in ../gpio/gpio.txt:57 > > > >There is a mention of GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH, as it's used in an example. > >However GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW is missing. I think both could do with > >documenting properly, then you can refer to them from here. > > > > I mean the lines above the example, they say to use the macros > defined in include/dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h whenever possible, > that's really all I would say. Let's at least attempt to stick to the rules. Please adapt your formatting to <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> in order to eradicate any Linuxiness. > >[...] > > > >>>>+Required properties: > >>>>+ - compatible : Should be "ti,tps65912". > >>>>+ - reg : Slave address or chip select number (I2C / SPI). > >>>>+ - interrupt-parent : The parent interrupt controller. > >>>>+ - interrupts : The interrupt line the device is connected to. > >>>>+ - interrupt-controller : Marks the device node as an interrupt controller. > >>>>+ - #interrupt-cells: The number of cells to describe an IRQ, this should be 2. > >>>>+ The first cell is the IRQ number. > >>>>+ The second cell is the flags, encoded as the trigger masks from > >>>>+ ../interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt > >>> > >>>Nit: We *normally* treat these as bullet-points and not place > >>>full-stops on them: > >>> > >>>$ git grep "compatible" -- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ | grep -v "\.$" | wc -l > >>>5227 > >>>$ git grep "compatible.*\.$" -- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ | wc -l > >>>486 > >>> > >> > >>What about for multi-sentence descriptions, we need the middle full-stops, then to not > >>have one on the end seems kinda odd looking. > > > >That's the way I usually do it -- doesn't look too bad. ;) > > > >[...] > > -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-02 16:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qqp3Q-6Uf-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1260483 |
On 11/02/2015 03:17 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > >> On 10/30/2015 02:06 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, Andrew F. Davis wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/30/2015 12:10 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2015, Andrew F. Davis wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> The TPS65912 PMIC contains several regulators and a GPIO controller. >>>>>> Add bindings for the TPS65912 PMIC. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-tps65912.txt | 16 +++++++ >>>>> >>>>> Why have you dropped Linus' Review-by? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Strange, I thought I made a change to this. Well this brings up a question, >>>> how much change can we have before we are supposed to drop Reviewed/Acked-by? >>> >>> Common sense call I'm afraid. ;) >>> >>> [...] >>> >>>>>> + the second cell is used to specify flags. >>>>>> + See include/dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h for possible values. >>>>> >>>>> This is a Linuxisum and shouldn't really live in here. >>>>> >>>>> I think it would be better to document them in ../gpio/gpio.txt and >>>>> reference that instead. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Looks like that is already in ../gpio/gpio.txt:57 >>> >>> There is a mention of GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH, as it's used in an example. >>> However GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW is missing. I think both could do with >>> documenting properly, then you can refer to them from here. >>> >> >> I mean the lines above the example, they say to use the macros >> defined in include/dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h whenever possible, >> that's really all I would say. > > Let's at least attempt to stick to the rules. > > Please adapt your formatting to <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> in order to > eradicate any Linuxiness. > Works for me, although I pushed v6 a couple days ago with a different fix, maybe that will work too? >>> [...] >>> >>>>>> +Required properties: >>>>>> + - compatible : Should be "ti,tps65912". >>>>>> + - reg : Slave address or chip select number (I2C / SPI). >>>>>> + - interrupt-parent : The parent interrupt controller. >>>>>> + - interrupts : The interrupt line the device is connected to. >>>>>> + - interrupt-controller : Marks the device node as an interrupt controller. >>>>>> + - #interrupt-cells: The number of cells to describe an IRQ, this should be 2. >>>>>> + The first cell is the IRQ number. >>>>>> + The second cell is the flags, encoded as the trigger masks from >>>>>> + ../interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt >>>>> >>>>> Nit: We *normally* treat these as bullet-points and not place >>>>> full-stops on them: >>>>> >>>>> $ git grep "compatible" -- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ | grep -v "\.$" | wc -l >>>>> 5227 >>>>> $ git grep "compatible.*\.$" -- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ | wc -l >>>>> 486 >>>>> >>>> >>>> What about for multi-sentence descriptions, we need the middle full-stops, then to not >>>> have one on the end seems kinda odd looking. >>> >>> That's the way I usually do it -- doesn't look too bad. ;) >>> >>> [...] >>> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web