Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1261155 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-11-03 03:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2015-11-03 16:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
Can srcu_read_lock() be called from interrupt context? Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@linux.intel.com> - 2015-11-03 03:10 +0100
Re: Can srcu_read_lock() be called from interrupt context? "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-11-03 11:00 +0100
Re: Can srcu_read_lock() be called from interrupt context? Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2015-11-03 15:50 +0100
Re: Can srcu_read_lock() be called from interrupt context? "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2015-11-03 16:40 +0100
| From | Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 03:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Can srcu_read_lock() be called from interrupt context? |
| Message-ID | <qqzcS-4Qb-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi, Paul I have a question to the srcu_read_lock(). Can it be invoked on interrupt context? According to http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/kernel/rcu/srcu.c#L292 it can only be called from process context, but according to http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/linux/srcu.h#L213 seems it's ok from irq context only if it matches with the srcu_read_unlock. Can you please give some hints? Thanks --jyh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 11:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qqGxI-10C-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1261155 |
On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 05:56:56PM -0800, Yunhong Jiang wrote: > Hi, Paul > I have a question to the srcu_read_lock(). Can it be invoked on > interrupt context? According to > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/kernel/rcu/srcu.c#L292 it can only be > called from process context, but according to > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/linux/srcu.h#L213 seems it's ok > from irq context only if it matches with the srcu_read_unlock. Can you > please give some hints? Adding Lai Jianshan for his thoughts. I believe that srcu.h is correct, at least assuming that interrupts do not nest too deeply. (If they were to nest four billion deep, then the ->seq[] counter could overflow, defeating the checks, but the CPU stack would have overflowed long before.) Lai, am I missing anything here? Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 15:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qqL4m-3Y0-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1261352 |
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:55:39AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 05:56:56PM -0800, Yunhong Jiang wrote: > > Hi, Paul > > I have a question to the srcu_read_lock(). Can it be invoked on > > interrupt context? According to > > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/kernel/rcu/srcu.c#L292 it can only be > > called from process context, but according to > > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/linux/srcu.h#L213 seems it's ok > > from irq context only if it matches with the srcu_read_unlock. Can you > > please give some hints? > > Adding Lai Jianshan for his thoughts. > > I believe that srcu.h is correct, at least assuming that interrupts do > not nest too deeply. (If they were to nest four billion deep, then the > ->seq[] counter could overflow, defeating the checks, but the CPU stack > would have overflowed long before.) It seems like a strange constraint to me; not being able to use srcu_read_lock() from IRQ (or even NMI) context. And looking at the various implementations of it nothing ever prohibited this. While srcu _allows_ for sleeping while holding the read side primitives, it is not required at all. So I would suggest amending the comment and RCU/checklist.txt. Even call_srcu() should be IRQ-safe. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-03 16:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qqLQJ-4xa-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1261551 |
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:47:17PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:55:39AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 05:56:56PM -0800, Yunhong Jiang wrote: > > > Hi, Paul > > > I have a question to the srcu_read_lock(). Can it be invoked on > > > interrupt context? According to > > > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/kernel/rcu/srcu.c#L292 it can only be > > > called from process context, but according to > > > http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/include/linux/srcu.h#L213 seems it's ok > > > from irq context only if it matches with the srcu_read_unlock. Can you > > > please give some hints? > > > > Adding Lai Jianshan for his thoughts. > > > > I believe that srcu.h is correct, at least assuming that interrupts do > > not nest too deeply. (If they were to nest four billion deep, then the > > ->seq[] counter could overflow, defeating the checks, but the CPU stack > > would have overflowed long before.) > > It seems like a strange constraint to me; not being able to use > srcu_read_lock() from IRQ (or even NMI) context. And looking at the > various implementations of it nothing ever prohibited this. > > While srcu _allows_ for sleeping while holding the read side primitives, > it is not required at all. > > So I would suggest amending the comment and RCU/checklist.txt. We need to hear from Lai. I -think- that it is OK for one srcu_read_lock() to interrupt another, but I could easily be missing something. > Even call_srcu() should be IRQ-safe. Looks plausible to me. Lai? Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web