Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1260045 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: simplify RSM into 64-bit protected mode

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: simplify RSM into 64-bit protected mode Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> - 2015-10-31 21:00 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: simplify RSM into 64-bit protected mode Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-11-02 10:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: simplify RSM into 64-bit protected mode Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> - 2015-11-03 10:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: simplify RSM into 64-bit protected mode Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2015-11-03 11:10 +0100

#1260045 — Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: simplify RSM into 64-bit protected mode

On 10/30/15 16:36, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> This series bases on "KVM: x86: fix RSM into 64-bit protected mode,
> round 2" and reverts it in [3/3].  To avoid regressions after doing so,
> [1/2] introduces a helper that is used in [2/2] to hopefully get the
> same behavior.
> 
> I'll set up test environment next week, unless a random act of kindness
> allows me not to.
> 
> 
> Radim Krčmář (3):
>   KVM: x86: add read_phys to x86_emulate_ops
>   KVM: x86: handle SMBASE as physical address in RSM
>   KVM: x86: simplify RSM into 64-bit protected mode
> 
>  arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 10 +++++++++
>  arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c             | 44 +++++++++-----------------------------
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c                 | 10 +++++++++
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 

Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

Thanks, Radim.
Laszlo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1260496

On 31/10/2015 20:50, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

Thanks Laszlo, I applied patches 1 and 2 (since your "part 2" never was :)).

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1261343

On 11/02/15 10:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 31/10/2015 20:50, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks Laszlo, I applied patches 1 and 2 (since your "part 2" never was :)).
> 
> Paolo
> 

Thanks.

Since you can rebase the queue freely, can you please also add:

Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

to Radim's patch "KVM: x86: handle SMBASE as physical address in RSM"?

Thanks
Laszlo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1261357

On 03/11/2015 10:40, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 11/02/15 10:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 31/10/2015 20:50, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> Tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>>
>> Thanks Laszlo, I applied patches 1 and 2 (since your "part 2" never was :)).
>>
>> Paolo
>>
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Since you can rebase the queue freely, can you please also add:
> 
> Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> 
> to Radim's patch "KVM: x86: handle SMBASE as physical address in RSM"?

Sure, will do.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web