Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1256723 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] tracing: Only benchmark the time tracepoints take if tracing is on

Started byChunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org>
First post2015-10-27 13:20 +0100
Last post2015-10-28 03:30 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] tracing: Only benchmark the time tracepoints take if tracing is on Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> - 2015-10-27 13:20 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] tracing: Only benchmark the time tracepoints take if  tracing is on Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-10-28 03:30 +0100

#1256723 — [PATCH] tracing: Only benchmark the time tracepoints take if tracing is on

FromChunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org>
Date2015-10-27 13:20 +0100
Subject[PATCH] tracing: Only benchmark the time tracepoints take if tracing is on
Message-ID<qobom-56u-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
There's no need to record the time tracepoints take when tracing is off.
This is because:
1) We cannot see these records since ring_buffer record is off at that
moment.
2) If tracing is off and benchmark tracepoint is enabled, the time
tracepoint takes is fewer than the same situation when tracing is on,
since the tracepoints need to be wrote into ring_buffer, it would
take more time. If turn on tracing at this moment, the average and
standard deviation cannot exactly present the time that tracepoints
take to write data into ring_buffer.

Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_benchmark.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/trace_benchmark.c
index 40a14cb..0f109c4 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_benchmark.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static void trace_do_benchmark(void)
 	unsigned int std = 0;
 
 	/* Only run if the tracepoint is actually active */
-	if (!trace_benchmark_event_enabled())
+	if (!trace_benchmark_event_enabled() || !tracing_is_on())
 		return;
 
 	local_irq_disable();
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1257590 — Re: [PATCH] tracing: Only benchmark the time tracepoints take if tracing is on

FromSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date2015-10-28 03:30 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH] tracing: Only benchmark the time tracepoints take if tracing is on
Message-ID<qooEV-4Wx-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1256723
On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:12:13 +0800
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org> wrote:

> There's no need to record the time tracepoints take when tracing is off.
> This is because:
> 1) We cannot see these records since ring_buffer record is off at that
> moment.
> 2) If tracing is off and benchmark tracepoint is enabled, the time
> tracepoint takes is fewer than the same situation when tracing is on,
> since the tracepoints need to be wrote into ring_buffer, it would
> take more time. If turn on tracing at this moment, the average and
> standard deviation cannot exactly present the time that tracepoints
> take to write data into ring_buffer.
> 

Thanks! I'll add this when I get back from traveling.

-- Steve


> Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@linaro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web