Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1257759 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] recordmcount: arm64: replace the ignored mcount call into nop

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

Contents

  [PATCH] recordmcount: arm64: replace the ignored mcount call into nop Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> - 2015-10-28 09:10 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] recordmcount: arm64: replace the ignored mcount call  into nop Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2015-10-28 09:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] recordmcount: arm64: replace the ignored mcount call  into nop Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-10-28 13:00 +0100
        Re: [PATCH] recordmcount: arm64: replace the ignored mcount call into  nop AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> - 2015-10-29 06:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH] recordmcount: arm64: replace the ignored mcount call  into nop Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2015-10-29 16:10 +0100
      Re: [PATCH] recordmcount: arm64: replace the ignored mcount call into  nop libin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> - 2015-10-30 07:10 +0100

#1257759 — [PATCH] recordmcount: arm64: replace the ignored mcount call into nop

By now, the recordmcount only records the function that in
following sections:
.text/.ref.text/.sched.text/.spinlock.text/.irqentry.text/
.kprobes.text/.text.unlikely

For the function that not in these sections, the call mcount
will be in place and not be replaced when kernel boot up. And
it will bring performance overhead, such as do_mem_abort (in
.exception.text section). This patch make the call mcount to
nop for this case in recordmcount.

Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
---
 scripts/recordmcount.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/scripts/recordmcount.c b/scripts/recordmcount.c
index 3d1984e..f697226 100644
--- a/scripts/recordmcount.c
+++ b/scripts/recordmcount.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 
 #ifndef EM_AARCH64
 #define EM_AARCH64	183
+#define R_AARCH64_NONE		0
 #define R_AARCH64_ABS64	257
 #endif
 
@@ -160,6 +161,21 @@ static int make_nop_x86(void *map, size_t const offset)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static unsigned char ideal_nop4_arm64[4] = {0x1f, 0x20, 0x03, 0xd5};
+static int make_nop_arm64(void *map, size_t const offset)
+{
+	uint32_t *ptr;
+
+	ptr = map + offset;
+	if (*ptr != 0x94000000)
+		return -1;
+
+	/* Convert to nop */
+	ulseek(fd_map, offset, SEEK_SET);
+	uwrite(fd_map, ideal_nop, 4);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Get the whole file as a programming convenience in order to avoid
  * malloc+lseek+read+free of many pieces.  If successful, then mmap
@@ -353,7 +369,12 @@ do_file(char const *const fname)
 			 altmcount = "__gnu_mcount_nc";
 			 break;
 	case EM_AARCH64:
-			 reltype = R_AARCH64_ABS64; gpfx = '_'; break;
+			reltype = R_AARCH64_ABS64;
+			make_nop = make_nop_arm64;
+			rel_type_nop = R_AARCH64_NONE;
+			ideal_nop = ideal_nop4_arm64;
+			gpfx = '_';
+			break;
 	case EM_IA_64:	 reltype = R_IA64_IMM64;   gpfx = '_'; break;
 	case EM_METAG:	 reltype = R_METAG_ADDR32;
 			 altmcount = "_mcount_wrapper";
-- 
1.7.12.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1257771 — Re: [PATCH] recordmcount: arm64: replace the ignored mcount call into nop

On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:04:05 +0800
Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> wrote:

> By now, the recordmcount only records the function that in
> following sections:
> .text/.ref.text/.sched.text/.spinlock.text/.irqentry.text/
> .kprobes.text/.text.unlikely
> 
> For the function that not in these sections, the call mcount
> will be in place and not be replaced when kernel boot up. And
> it will bring performance overhead, such as do_mem_abort (in
> .exception.text section). This patch make the call mcount to
> nop for this case in recordmcount.

I can take this in my tree with an Ack from the ARM64 maintainers.

-- Steve

> 
> Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
> ---
>  scripts/recordmcount.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/recordmcount.c b/scripts/recordmcount.c
> index 3d1984e..f697226 100644
> --- a/scripts/recordmcount.c
> +++ b/scripts/recordmcount.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>  
>  #ifndef EM_AARCH64
>  #define EM_AARCH64	183
> +#define R_AARCH64_NONE		0
>  #define R_AARCH64_ABS64	257
>  #endif
>  
> @@ -160,6 +161,21 @@ static int make_nop_x86(void *map, size_t const offset)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned char ideal_nop4_arm64[4] = {0x1f, 0x20, 0x03, 0xd5};
> +static int make_nop_arm64(void *map, size_t const offset)
> +{
> +	uint32_t *ptr;
> +
> +	ptr = map + offset;
> +	if (*ptr != 0x94000000)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	/* Convert to nop */
> +	ulseek(fd_map, offset, SEEK_SET);
> +	uwrite(fd_map, ideal_nop, 4);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Get the whole file as a programming convenience in order to avoid
>   * malloc+lseek+read+free of many pieces.  If successful, then mmap
> @@ -353,7 +369,12 @@ do_file(char const *const fname)
>  			 altmcount = "__gnu_mcount_nc";
>  			 break;
>  	case EM_AARCH64:
> -			 reltype = R_AARCH64_ABS64; gpfx = '_'; break;
> +			reltype = R_AARCH64_ABS64;
> +			make_nop = make_nop_arm64;
> +			rel_type_nop = R_AARCH64_NONE;
> +			ideal_nop = ideal_nop4_arm64;
> +			gpfx = '_';
> +			break;
>  	case EM_IA_64:	 reltype = R_IA64_IMM64;   gpfx = '_'; break;
>  	case EM_METAG:	 reltype = R_METAG_ADDR32;
>  			 altmcount = "_mcount_wrapper";

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1257939 — Re: [PATCH] recordmcount: arm64: replace the ignored mcount call into nop

On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:16:19AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:04:05 +0800
> Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> > By now, the recordmcount only records the function that in
> > following sections:
> > .text/.ref.text/.sched.text/.spinlock.text/.irqentry.text/
> > .kprobes.text/.text.unlikely
> > 
> > For the function that not in these sections, the call mcount
> > will be in place and not be replaced when kernel boot up. And
> > it will bring performance overhead, such as do_mem_abort (in
> > .exception.text section). This patch make the call mcount to
> > nop for this case in recordmcount.
> 
> I can take this in my tree with an Ack from the ARM64 maintainers.

Looks like it does what it says on the tin:

  Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1258578 — Re: [PATCH] recordmcount: arm64: replace the ignored mcount call into nop

On 10/28/2015 08:58 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 04:16:19AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:04:05 +0800
>> Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>>> By now, the recordmcount only records the function that in
>>> following sections:
>>> .text/.ref.text/.sched.text/.spinlock.text/.irqentry.text/
>>> .kprobes.text/.text.unlikely
>>>
>>> For the function that not in these sections, the call mcount
>>> will be in place and not be replaced when kernel boot up. And
>>> it will bring performance overhead, such as do_mem_abort (in
>>> .exception.text section). This patch make the call mcount to
>>> nop for this case in recordmcount.

The patch itself is fine (it might be a good idea to describe
what 0x94000000 means though), but
I'm wondering whether we have any reason to exclude .exception.text
from tracing.
In my understandings, this attribute (.exception.text) is utilized
solely for pretty printing in dump_backtrace().

Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI

>> I can take this in my tree with an Ack from the ARM64 maintainers.
>
> Looks like it does what it says on the tin:
>
>    Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>
> Will
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1258852 — Re: [PATCH] recordmcount: arm64: replace the ignored mcount call into nop

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:35:42PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> [auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Li-Bin/recordmcount-arm64-replace-the-ignored-mcount-call-into-nop/20151028-160846
> config: arm64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> reproduce:
>         wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make.cross ARCH=arm64 
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
> >> /bin/bash: line 1: 117734 Segmentation fault      ./scripts/recordmcount "arch/arm64/kernel/traps.o"
> --
> >> /bin/bash: line 1: 113824 Segmentation fault      ./scripts/recordmcount "arch/arm64/mm/fault.o"

I can reproduce this locally with an allmodconfig build. The offset
parameter to make_nop_arm64 is nuts:

  Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
  make_nop_arm64 (map=0x7ffff7fef000, offset=2600547309829750784) at scripts/recordmcount.c:170
  170		if (*ptr != 0x94000000)

Both shdr->sh_offset (0x17000000000000) and relp->r_offset (0x2400000000000000)
look dodgy in the caller.

Li, can you take a look please?

Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1259225 — Re: [PATCH] recordmcount: arm64: replace the ignored mcount call into nop

在 2015/10/29 23:09, Will Deacon 写道:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 09:35:42PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> [auto build test ERROR on arm64/for-next/core -- if it's inappropriate base, please suggest rules for selecting the more suitable base]
>>
>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Li-Bin/recordmcount-arm64-replace-the-ignored-mcount-call-into-nop/20151028-160846
>> config: arm64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
>> reproduce:
>>         wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>         make.cross ARCH=arm64 
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>>> /bin/bash: line 1: 117734 Segmentation fault      ./scripts/recordmcount "arch/arm64/kernel/traps.o"
>> --
>>>> /bin/bash: line 1: 113824 Segmentation fault      ./scripts/recordmcount "arch/arm64/mm/fault.o"
> 
> I can reproduce this locally with an allmodconfig build. The offset
> parameter to make_nop_arm64 is nuts:
> 
>   Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>   make_nop_arm64 (map=0x7ffff7fef000, offset=2600547309829750784) at scripts/recordmcount.c:170
>   170		if (*ptr != 0x94000000)
> 
> Both shdr->sh_offset (0x17000000000000) and relp->r_offset (0x2400000000000000)
> look dodgy in the caller.
> 

The allmodconfig configs the CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN, and the test system is little eddian, so
it triggers the error.

It is a bug in nop_mcount:
...
if (mcountsym == Elf_r_sym(relp) && !is_fake_mcount(relp)) {
        if (make_nop) {
                ret = make_nop((void *)ehdr, shdr->sh_offset + relp->r_offset);
        }
...

shdr->sh_offset and welp->r_offset should handle endianness properly as _w(shdr->sh_offset)/
_w(relp->r_offset). I will post a patchset including this patch soon.

Thanks,

Li Bin

> Li, can you take a look please?
> 
> Will
> 
> .
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web