Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1254430 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-23 11:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-10-26 09:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH v4 0/5] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2015-10-23 11:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2015-10-23 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> - 2015-10-23 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2 Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2015-10-26 09:20 +0100
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 11:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v4 0/5] enable I2C devices behind I2C bus on Gen2 |
| Message-ID | <qmGFZ-5oJ-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
There is a board in the wild, i.e. Intel Galileo Gen2, that has ACPI enumerated devices behind I2C bus. This patch series dedicated to enable those devices. The MFD framework is also updated to cope with interesting implementation of the cell descriptions under ACPI MFD (patch 1). The patches 5 and 6 are pretty independent and could be applied ahead, though they don't make much sense without previous ones. Wolfram, since Lee acknowledged patches 1-3, can you pull them to your tree? Tested on the actual Intel Galileo Gen2 by Ismo (gpio expanders) and me (at24). Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> Changelog v4: - amend at24 patch to satisfy sparse (Wolfram) - drop applied patches Changelog v3: - append ACKs from Rafael (from ACPI angle) - drop upstreamed patches (GPIO pca953x) Changelog v2: - append tags - re-make patch 3 (suggested by Lee) - improve patch 8 (suggested by Thierry) Andy Shevchenko (5): mfd: core: redo ACPI matching of the children devices mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: load gpio driver first mfd: intel_quark_i2c_gpio: support devices behind i2c bus at24: enable ACPI device found on Galileo Gen2 pwm-pca9685: enable ACPI device found on Galileo Gen2 Documentation/acpi/enumeration.txt | 11 +++++--- drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-------- drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c | 22 +++++++++++++--- drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 2 +- drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c | 20 ++++++++++++--- include/linux/mfd/core.h | 10 ++++++-- 7 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) -- 2.6.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qmJNx-1va-49@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1254430 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
> Wolfram, since Lee acknowledged patches 1-3, can you pull them to your tree? So, I picked patches 1-4 to my for-next. Patch 5 is missing an ACK.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-23 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qmL2W-3e7-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1254559 |
On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 14:38 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Wolfram, since Lee acknowledged patches 1-3, can you pull them to > > your tree? > > So, I picked patches 1-4 to my for-next. Patch 5 is missing an ACK. Right. Thanks! -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-26 09:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <qnLay-5QZ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1254559 |
On Fri, 23 Oct 2015, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > Wolfram, since Lee acknowledged patches 1-3, can you pull them to your tree? > > So, I picked patches 1-4 to my for-next. Patch 5 is missing an ACK. Can you place these patches onto their own branch, tag it and send the appropriate pull-request out please? -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web