Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1250307 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-19 04:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-10-20 03:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2015-10-19 04:50 +0200
RE: [PATCH] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option "Izumi, Taku" <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> - 2015-10-20 02:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> - 2015-10-20 03:50 +0200
| From | Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-19 04:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: Introduce kernelcore=reliable option |
| Message-ID | <ql8Gl-7Ua-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 2015/10/15 21:32, Taku Izumi wrote: > Xeon E7 v3 based systems supports Address Range Mirroring > and UEFI BIOS complied with UEFI spec 2.5 can notify which > ranges are reliable (mirrored) via EFI memory map. > Now Linux kernel utilize its information and allocates > boot time memory from reliable region. > > My requirement is: > - allocate kernel memory from reliable region > - allocate user memory from non-reliable region > > In order to meet my requirement, ZONE_MOVABLE is useful. > By arranging non-reliable range into ZONE_MOVABLE, > reliable memory is only used for kernel allocations. > > This patch extends existing "kernelcore" option and > introduces kernelcore=reliable option. By specifying > "reliable" instead of specifying the amount of memory, > non-reliable region will be arranged into ZONE_MOVABLE. > > Earlier discussion is at: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/9/24 > Hi Taku, If user don't want to waste a lot of memory, and he only set a few memory to mirrored memory, then the kernelcore is very small, right? That means OS will have a very small normal zone and a very large movable zone. Kernel allocation could only use the unmovable zone. As the normal zone is very small, the kernel allocation maybe OOM, right? Do you mean that we will reuse the movable zone in short-term solution and create a new zone(mirrored zone) in future? Thanks, Xishi Qiu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Izumi, Taku" <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-20 02:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qlt85-48v-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1250307 |
Hi Xishi, > On 2015/10/15 21:32, Taku Izumi wrote: > > > Xeon E7 v3 based systems supports Address Range Mirroring > > and UEFI BIOS complied with UEFI spec 2.5 can notify which > > ranges are reliable (mirrored) via EFI memory map. > > Now Linux kernel utilize its information and allocates > > boot time memory from reliable region. > > > > My requirement is: > > - allocate kernel memory from reliable region > > - allocate user memory from non-reliable region > > > > In order to meet my requirement, ZONE_MOVABLE is useful. > > By arranging non-reliable range into ZONE_MOVABLE, > > reliable memory is only used for kernel allocations. > > > > This patch extends existing "kernelcore" option and > > introduces kernelcore=reliable option. By specifying > > "reliable" instead of specifying the amount of memory, > > non-reliable region will be arranged into ZONE_MOVABLE. > > > > Earlier discussion is at: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/9/24 > > > > Hi Taku, > > If user don't want to waste a lot of memory, and he only set > a few memory to mirrored memory, then the kernelcore is very > small, right? That means OS will have a very small normal zone > and a very large movable zone. Right. > Kernel allocation could only use the unmovable zone. As the > normal zone is very small, the kernel allocation maybe OOM, > right? Right. > Do you mean that we will reuse the movable zone in short-term > solution and create a new zone(mirrored zone) in future? If there is that kind of requirements, I don't oppose creating a new zone. Sincerely, Taku Izumi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-20 03:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qludQ-5JP-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1251171 |
On 2015/10/20 8:34, Izumi, Taku wrote: > Hi Xishi, > >> On 2015/10/15 21:32, Taku Izumi wrote: >> >>> Xeon E7 v3 based systems supports Address Range Mirroring >>> and UEFI BIOS complied with UEFI spec 2.5 can notify which >>> ranges are reliable (mirrored) via EFI memory map. >>> Now Linux kernel utilize its information and allocates >>> boot time memory from reliable region. >>> >>> My requirement is: >>> - allocate kernel memory from reliable region >>> - allocate user memory from non-reliable region >>> >>> In order to meet my requirement, ZONE_MOVABLE is useful. >>> By arranging non-reliable range into ZONE_MOVABLE, >>> reliable memory is only used for kernel allocations. >>> >>> This patch extends existing "kernelcore" option and >>> introduces kernelcore=reliable option. By specifying >>> "reliable" instead of specifying the amount of memory, >>> non-reliable region will be arranged into ZONE_MOVABLE. >>> >>> Earlier discussion is at: >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/9/24 >>> >> >> Hi Taku, >> >> If user don't want to waste a lot of memory, and he only set >> a few memory to mirrored memory, then the kernelcore is very >> small, right? That means OS will have a very small normal zone >> and a very large movable zone. > > Right. > >> Kernel allocation could only use the unmovable zone. As the >> normal zone is very small, the kernel allocation maybe OOM, >> right? > > Right. > >> Do you mean that we will reuse the movable zone in short-term >> solution and create a new zone(mirrored zone) in future? > > If there is that kind of requirements, I don't oppose > creating a new zone. > As far as I know, some apps(e.g. date base) maybe could only use the normal zone. Thanks, Xishi Qiu > Sincerely, > Taku Izumi > > . > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web