Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1250319 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-10-19 06:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2015-10-19 23:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/79] 3.14.55-stable review Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2015-10-19 06:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/79] 3.14.55-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-10-19 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/79] 3.14.55-stable review Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org> - 2015-10-19 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/79] 3.14.55-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2015-10-19 22:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/79] 3.14.55-stable review Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org> - 2015-10-19 23:40 +0200
| From | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-19 06:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3.14 00/79] 3.14.55-stable review |
| Message-ID | <qla5r-1C5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On 10/17/2015 07:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.14.55 release.
> There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Tue Oct 20 02:00:11 UTC 2015.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 127 pass: 125 fail: 2
Failed builds:
hexagon:defconfig
hexagon:allnoconfig
Qemu test results:
total: 80 pass: 80 fail: 0
The hexagon build failures are different than before, but the builds still fail.
In file included from include/linux/mm.h:19:0,
from arch/hexagon/kernel/asm-offsets.c:28:
include/linux/bit_spinlock.h: In function 'bit_spin_unlock':
include/linux/bit_spinlock.h:62:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__before_clear_bit'
In file included from arch/hexagon/kernel/asm-offsets.c:29:0:
include/linux/interrupt.h: In function 'tasklet_disable_nosync':
include/linux/interrupt.h:541:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__after_atomic_inc'
include/linux/interrupt.h: In function 'tasklet_enable':
include/linux/interrupt.h:553:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__before_atomic_dec'
Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-19 17:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qlkoa-8eL-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1250319 |
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 09:10:20PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/17/2015 07:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.14.55 release. > >There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >let me know. > > > >Responses should be made by Tue Oct 20 02:00:11 UTC 2015. > >Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Build results: > total: 127 pass: 125 fail: 2 > Failed builds: > hexagon:defconfig > hexagon:allnoconfig > > Qemu test results: > total: 80 pass: 80 fail: 0 > > The hexagon build failures are different than before, but the builds still fail. > > In file included from include/linux/mm.h:19:0, > from arch/hexagon/kernel/asm-offsets.c:28: > include/linux/bit_spinlock.h: In function 'bit_spin_unlock': > include/linux/bit_spinlock.h:62:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__before_clear_bit' > In file included from arch/hexagon/kernel/asm-offsets.c:29:0: > include/linux/interrupt.h: In function 'tasklet_disable_nosync': > include/linux/interrupt.h:541:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__after_atomic_inc' > include/linux/interrupt.h: In function 'tasklet_enable': > include/linux/interrupt.h:553:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__before_atomic_dec' Odd, any idea what we can do to fix it? greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-19 21:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qlo8p-5ij-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1250813 |
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:14:47AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 09:10:20PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 10/17/2015 07:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.14.55 release. > > >There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > >let me know. > > > > > >Responses should be made by Tue Oct 20 02:00:11 UTC 2015. > > >Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > Build results: > > total: 127 pass: 125 fail: 2 > > Failed builds: > > hexagon:defconfig > > hexagon:allnoconfig > > > > Qemu test results: > > total: 80 pass: 80 fail: 0 > > > > The hexagon build failures are different than before, but the builds still fail. > > > > In file included from include/linux/mm.h:19:0, > > from arch/hexagon/kernel/asm-offsets.c:28: > > include/linux/bit_spinlock.h: In function 'bit_spin_unlock': > > include/linux/bit_spinlock.h:62:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__before_clear_bit' > > In file included from arch/hexagon/kernel/asm-offsets.c:29:0: > > include/linux/interrupt.h: In function 'tasklet_disable_nosync': > > include/linux/interrupt.h:541:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__after_atomic_inc' > > include/linux/interrupt.h: In function 'tasklet_enable': > > include/linux/interrupt.h:553:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__before_atomic_dec' > > Odd, any idea what we can do to fix it? > > greg k-h Apologies, the previous patch was the wrong one. It really should have been this one: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2ab08ee9f0a4eba27c7c4ce0b6d5118e8a18554b There was a stale barrier.h left in the directory. I tested this patch along with "sched: Fix TASK_DEAD race in finish_task_switch" on v3.14 and it compiled for me. Thanks, Richard Kuo -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-19 22:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qloUO-6vr-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1251020 |
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 02:13:31PM -0500, Richard Kuo wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:14:47AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 09:10:20PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On 10/17/2015 07:04 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.14.55 release. > > > >There are 79 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > >let me know. > > > > > > > >Responses should be made by Tue Oct 20 02:00:11 UTC 2015. > > > >Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > Build results: > > > total: 127 pass: 125 fail: 2 > > > Failed builds: > > > hexagon:defconfig > > > hexagon:allnoconfig > > > > > > Qemu test results: > > > total: 80 pass: 80 fail: 0 > > > > > > The hexagon build failures are different than before, but the builds still fail. > > > > > > In file included from include/linux/mm.h:19:0, > > > from arch/hexagon/kernel/asm-offsets.c:28: > > > include/linux/bit_spinlock.h: In function 'bit_spin_unlock': > > > include/linux/bit_spinlock.h:62:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__before_clear_bit' > > > In file included from arch/hexagon/kernel/asm-offsets.c:29:0: > > > include/linux/interrupt.h: In function 'tasklet_disable_nosync': > > > include/linux/interrupt.h:541:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__after_atomic_inc' > > > include/linux/interrupt.h: In function 'tasklet_enable': > > > include/linux/interrupt.h:553:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'smp_mb__before_atomic_dec' > > > > Odd, any idea what we can do to fix it? > > > > greg k-h > > Apologies, the previous patch was the wrong one. So should I delete it? And if so, can you refresh my memory as to which patch it was? > It really should have been this one: > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2ab08ee9f0a4eba27c7c4ce0b6d5118e8a18554b > > There was a stale barrier.h left in the directory. I've applied this one now as well, thanks. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-10-19 23:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <qlqjV-8tO-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1251044 |
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 01:09:50PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > Apologies, the previous patch was the wrong one. > > So should I delete it? And if so, can you refresh my memory as to which > patch it was? This was the errant patch that you can remove from the queue. From 94cf42f823bc904305b0ee93a09bcd51ba380497 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:00:36 +0100 Subject: arch,hexagon: Convert smp_mb__*() Thanks, Richard Kuo -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web